Sunday, May 29, 2016

Something to Know - 29 May



Steve Breen




This article from today's NY Times is very closely related to the global drought issues, and brings to mind what we in California are experiencing.   Vietnam has suffered from the heavy-handed policies from a central government that is not listening to the concerns of environmentalists.   Getting all the water to produce an exaggerated rice harvest has resulted in sea water encroaching up the damned rivers to kill the crops and all related plants.   Does this bring to mind a pea-brained blowhard coming to our state of California and vowing to open up the flood gates to unleash all the water?   Poor Donny....he's as dumb as the Communist Party Central Planners of Vietnam:


Drought and 'Rice First' Policy Imperil Vietnamese Farmers

By JANE PERLEZMAY 28, 2016

Photo

SOC TRANG, Vietnam — When the rice shoots began to wither on Lam Thi Loi's farm in the heart of the Mekong Delta, a usually verdant region ofVietnam, she faced a hard choice: Let them die in the parched earth, or pump salty water from the river to give them a chance.

Like many seasoned farmers here, she risked the saline water. The crop perished within days.

The Mekong Delta, Vietnam's premier rice growing region, is suffering its worst drought since French colonial administrators began recording statistics in 1926. Giant cracks, some a foot deep, gouge the hard earth; brown stalks of dead rice litter the fields; and the dryness is so severe even the pests lie shriveled on the ground.

"I've been planting rice since I was 13, and I have never seen anything like this," Ms. Loi, 38, said as she sat in her neat living room. "In February I got one bag of rice. Last year we harvested 1.4 tons."

The increasingly dramatic effect of El Niño, the weather phenomenon that causes excessive heat and reduced rainfall in Southeast Asia, is the prime reason for the crop failures in the delta, scientists say. But it is not the only one.

LAOS

THAILAND

CAMBODIA

Tonle

Sap

VIETNAM

Mekong

River

Phnom Penh

Ho Chi Minh City

Gulf of

Thailand

South China Sea

Mekong

Delta

150 Miles

By The New York Times

The Communist government's insistence that farmers grow three rice crops a year, instead of the traditional one or two, has depleted the soil of nutrients, exacerbating the impact of the drought, they say.

And water from the sea has invaded the lower reaches of the Mekong River, which is more shallow than usual, sweeping saline water farther up the delta than ever before and wiping out rice fields.

All 13 provinces in the delta, home to 17 million people, or one-fifth of Vietnam's population, are suffering from salt water in agricultural lands, the government said. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development reported in March that 200,000 households experienced serious water shortages, and that the number was rising.



Saline water has long been invading the delta, but because of the drought there is not enough fresh water in the river and its distributaries to dilute the seawater. The salt is having a more deleterious impact, the scientists say.

The rice crop crisis has highlighted the need for the government to adjust its heavy emphasis on rice growing, and to encourage shrimp farming as a more profitable and practical substitute, said Nguyen Huu Thien, a consultant with the International Union for Conservation of Nature.


"Vietnam is the second-biggest rice exporter after Thailand," Mr. Thien said, referring to the Southeast Asian region. "But there is no glory in that because the farmers are not thriving, and there is a lot of migration out of the delta."

The government is stuck on a "rice first" policy that harks back to the 1970s, after the Communist victory in the Vietnam War, when the people were hungry and the country was isolated, bereft of trading partners and without a manufacturing sector.

In those days, the government mobilized work teams to construct earthen dikes along major canals in the delta to keep the salt water out and to foster better conditions for rice growing, said Timothy Gorman, a researcher on the delta at Cornell University.

Government-financed sluice gates were built in the 1990s, he said. By 2001, some farmers were so fed up with the efforts to hold back the salt water that they attacked the sluice gates and destroyed them, making way for the cultivation of tiger prawns in the western part of the delta.

Many farmers know the saline water is good for producing shrimp, Mr. Gorman said, but while they get subsidies for rice, they are not encouraged to switch to shrimp.

Photo
Huynh Anh Dung's rice crop in Soc Trang Province in the Mekong Delta was destroyed by drought.CreditThe New York Times

The construction of hydropower dams upstream from the delta, and dams in China's southern province of Yunnan, are adding to the woes.

A 2010 study commissioned by the Mekong River Commission warned against the building of 11 dams in Laos and Cambodia because they would trap valuable sediment and stop it from reaching the delta. The report was ignored, two of the dams are under construction, and the rest are scheduled to go ahead.

In a rare concession to Vietnam, the Chinese released water from dams in Yunnan Province in March, but the flow was too small to make a difference to the failing rice crops, the Vietnamese authorities said.

Resentment toward the government is rising among the villagers.

The provincial authorities kept them in the dark, residents said. In October, the water level in the vast Tonle Sap Lake in Cambodia, which feeds into the Mekong River, was perilously low.

Two other big reservoirs of water in the Vietnamese provinces of An Giang and Dong Thap that help soak the rice fields were also at extremely low levels.


Ms. Loi said she had not been warned. She went ahead, plowing and planting. She has lost more than $1,000 on seeds, fertilizers and labor, she said.

Yet when she attended a meeting called recently by district officials to discuss the problems, the villagers were met with scorn, she said. "They offered me only $120," she said. "It is nothing. We have no right to negotiate with them. They said the farmers don't know anything. But we do know our business."

On the banks of the river two hours away, a more prosperous rice farmer, Huynh Anh Dung, 34, presides over six acres of land, his share of a vast property founded by his grandfather nearly 100 years ago.

When his rice crop failed in February because of salty water, he decided to forsake a third crop. He knew it was folly to try again.

"A friend had a machine that measures the salt in the water," he said. "There was 4.8 parts per thousand. Anything over two parts per thousand kills the plants."

Photo

Some farmers have fled to Ho Chi Minh City to find work, leaving villages with only half their population.

In some towns and villages, farmers like Mr. Dung have comfortable homes with polished wood furniture, televisions, motorbikes for getting around on the roads and outboard motor boats on the rivers. A mildly sweet iced tea, with crushed ice, is served as a welcoming drink to visitors.

Mr. Dung is staying put, tethered to his ancestral lands. He had saved enough money from past crops that he did not need part-time work. His uncle had started growing organic bitter melons on a portion of land on the family farm, a project that was doing well.

On a recent morning, he hired a worker to dig shallow trenches in the fields so that when the rains finally arrive the salt now embedded in the earth will run away more quickly.

The signs of well-being will not last, said Mr. Thien, who was one of the authors of the 2010 report on the dams. With so many dams coming on line upstream, the lack of sediment will eventually kill the delta, leaving it a wasteland in the next 100 years or so.

"The impact of the dams will be irreversible," he said.

Mr. Dung could not see so far into the future. As he contemplated the salt damage, and his scorched earth, thunder rumbled in the distance. Gray clouds hung overhead, the first in six months. "I hope it rains," he said.


--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Saturday, May 28, 2016

Something to Know - 28 May

Lalo Alcaraz

Hector Tobar used to write for the LA Times, until they down-sized and got rid of a lot of good writers.  He teaches up in Oregon now, but maintains a good perspective of Los Angeles, especially from the Latin American point of view.   He points out that many of the migrating immigrants first come to California, and get prepped and frustrated, then move to other states to live their "dream", or something like that.   I think you might enjoy this article.

California's Midlife Crisis
By HÉCTOR TOBAR MAY 27, 2016



Los Angeles — MY hometown looks sleek and Scandinavian in car commercials. In a perpetual loop of old cable television movie reruns, our freeways are wide and open and uncluttered, our palm trees remain untainted by graffiti, and the friendly, sun-tanned officers of the Los Angeles Police Department never have a misplaced hair in their crew cuts.

The real Los Angeles is gray and beaten down, an older man trying to fit into a younger body. We Angelenos are reminded of this when we drive down roads that have been repaved and retrofitted for a half-century or longer. To enter my local freeway, I cross a bridge built in 1940, past a crumbling concrete railing that has been struck so often by speeding Edsels, Ramblers and Explorers that it looks like a relic from a World War II battle.

The median age in metropolitan Los Angeles is 35, so we're on the cusp of middle age. Once famous for our mellow and licentious vibe, we've become an irascible lot. We see order breaking down at that most sacred of Los Angeles meeting points: the four-way stop. It's more common than ever to see some harried commuter slip past without waiting his turn. It makes me want to scream.

No wonder we're feeling the pressure. By some estimates, California now includes the three most densely populated metro areas in the United States: Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Jose.

It is in this vexed state that California is preparing to vote in a June election, the first time a presidential primary here has received so much attention since Robert F. Kennedy and Eugene McCarthy fought it out in 1968.

We're looking for a savior to rescue us from our midlife crisis. Already, our existential angst has led us to some bad decisions. We gave the world the political career of Arnold Schwarzenegger, the bodybuilding graduate of Muscle Beach. He was Ronald Reagan on steroids — in part, literally — and the more conservative among us voted him into office so that he'd "kick butt" on budgets. These days, he shills for a video game.

"See that actor pretending to be a general," I tell my kids when a Mobile Strike commercial comes on, the Terminator dressed in epaulets. "He was governor of California!"

The median age in the Golden State is also 35, but nearly half the state's likely voters are 55 or older. Many have thus lived long enough to see several cycles of boom and bust: from deindustrialization to dot-coms, from white flight to black flight, from the Great Real Estate Bust of 2008 to the hipsterati gentrification scourge of the present day.

Sadly, even the booms don't bring us much joy any more. As I write, unemployment is way down and property values are up, yet across the social spectrum everyone is stressed out. Immigrant laborers live with low wages and the possibility of being deported. The middle class feels pushed out by impossible housing costs. And the rich are mad at the rest of us simply because we're so many, and we keep getting in their way.

This election season, we have new political suitors trying to tap into our stress-induced anger.

Donald J. Trump is promising to chauffeur us in luxury to a simpler, whiter time — one focus group recently compared Mr. Trump to a Porsche. Bernie Sanders, with his tousled white hair and socialist message, reminds us of California's tie-dyed past. I can imagine him driving me to Big Sur in a Volkswagen bus.

In the semi-gentrified barrio near my home, there's a local artist trying to drum up Latino support for Senator Sanders. He's making "Viva Bernie" signs, silk-screened, just like in the '60s.

Recent polls have Latinos starting to drift toward the Bern in the Democratic primary. They've voted for an old white guy before. In the last election for governor, Latinos voted by a nearly three to one margin for Jerry Brown — he'd been governor in the '70s and '80s, they figured he could run things decently and rescue public education from a budgetary cliff.

This November, Latinos will be looking for someone to beat back the xenophobic entertainer who now has a lock on the Republican nomination. For that reason, they'll vote for Hillary Clinton in droves if she's the nominee.

Latinos are now a plurality in California. But even many of them feel the Golden State is just too much. Young Latino families have started moving away, founding new barrios and soccer leagues in North Carolina and Georgia, joining a new exodus. Since about 1995, net migration into California has reversed.

Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.


These days, we're exporting blue-capped Dodger fans to other cities: I see them on television at Dodger away games in Denver, Washington and other places, a boisterous bunch who are often louder than fans for the home team. Angelenos now go to New York City to relax. We get to get out of our cars when we're there. The whole Manhattan vibe is more orderly, less frenzied.

I even get the impression that the rest of the country now finds Californians more obnoxious than New Yorkers. In Oregon, where I teach, people blame us for an increase in bicycle accidents.

Back home in our empty nest, as the Golden State drifts toward its golden years, we know that just staying safe and keeping things semi-together is achievement enough. With age has come wisdom, and we've reached a kind of acceptance with things that made us angry. Once or twice in our youth some of us rioted, and some voted for initiatives against immigrants and gay marriage.

As stressed out as we Californians are, we won't be doing anything that self-destructive this election year.

Héctor Tobar, the author of "Deep Down Dark: The Untold Stories of 33 Men Buried in a Chilean Mine, and the Miracle That Set Them Free," teaches writing at the University of Oregon and is a contributing opinion writer.


--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Friday, May 27, 2016

Something to Know - 27 May

Tom Toles


Okay, got back yesterday evening.   Wonderful cruise, and people and visits with old friends along the way.   Canada is one amazing place with its beautiful landscapes of greens and trees, diversity of peoples, and common sense values.  The whole trip went well, even the TSA experience coming out of SEATAC airport on the way back.   Once off the plane at LAX, a 2 hour and 30 minute UBER ride back to Claremont (lots of cars on the road in LA).  Got in the front door, and then is when things turned not-so-good.  Malfunctioning toilet, broken microwave oven door (how does it break when you've been away for almost three weeks?), and a locked down VISA credit card because of suspected fraud for charging stuff in places we do not normally frequent.  Time to get back to life at home now.   This piece is from Robert Wolfe, Harvey Mudd College Professor Emeritus in Physics from MIT, who is in his element talking about elements:
Subject: Fw: New Element - Heaviest known to science

Subject: New Element - Heaviest known to science

Lawrence Livermore Laboratories has discovered the heaviest element 
yet known to science.
The new element, Governmentium (Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant 
neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons, and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, 
giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which 
are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert; however, it can
be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes 
into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would 
normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete.

Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2- 6 years.
It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a  portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, 
since each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons, 
forming isodopes.

This characteristic of morons promotion leads some scientists to  believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a 
critical concentration.
This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical morass.
When catalyzed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium, an 
element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium since it 
has half as many peons but twice as many morons!!
--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Monday, May 23, 2016

Jerry Rubin says ‘thank you’ to his caring and thoughtful friends, and will soon begin a 3-week ‘Health Fast for Healing and Recovery’.


From Jerry Peace Activist Rubin (sent from Santa Monica syndicate):

Dear Friends,
First, I just wanted to again deeply thank everyone for their support and 'get well' messages following the April 16 auto accident when a car hit me while I was crossing at a crosswalk near my Santa Monica residence.
I’m very grateful the accident wasn’t worse. 
It easily could have been much worse.
But it was bad enough.
And now, after 10 days in the hospital and a rehabilitation facility, weeks of pain killers, at-home physical therapy treatments, and much toxic stress, I’m finally off of anti-pain medication and am now getting around without using my previously needed walker. I’m also back staffing my bumper sticker peace table on the Santa Monica Third Street Promenade, and working every day to build up my endurance and fully heal my body. I’m still dealing with the stress and tension the accident caused, and am trying, through it all, to maintain a positive, hopeful and optimistic attitude.
I just wanted to let you know that I will soon be starting a 3-week liquid-only ‘Health Fast for Healing and Recovery’ and I am asking for your continued emotional support.
I will be starting my fast on May 31, the day after Memorial Day and will continue through the June 20Summer Solstice. The definition of ‘memorialize’ is “to do or create something that causes people to remember”. On my fast I certainly will be personally memorializing peace, healing, recovery and gratitude! And the Summer Solstice has often been thought of as a time for new beginnings as well as a time of intensity, renewal and great potential. 
But please do not worry about my fasting! I have,over the years,fasted many times for many good causes. I will be adding vitamins and minerals with my healthful drinks.
So,again, I offer much thanks for your caring, kindness and support. Your well wishes have already helped much in my healing and recovery!

Peace and gratitude,Jerry
www.facebook.com/jerry.rubin.98 (just in case we are not yet facebook friends)

Friday, May 13, 2016

California

This is Monterey Bay this morning

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

Something to know 5/11/16: Moving to Canada, Eh? And other stories

The in-laws are about to depart on a boat, so now I'm in charge of the blog--at least until J5 returns.



O Canada
Apparently, Google searches of the phrase "move to Canada." are up, in part due to the impending doom of a Trump presidency. (I recall looking at this after W got reelected in 04. Oy.) Vox capitalized on that by running a thoughtful piece that includes interviews with actual Americans who immigrated to Canada, like my college friend Neda Maghbouleh.

Neda and her husband are sociology professors in Toronto. The Vox explainer crystalized the differences in the approaches to immigration and growth by the two countries, which I personally found useful. Canada prioritizes admitting highly skilled workers and refugees. Family reunification - a cornerstone for our policy - is not as much a priority in Canada. My friend Neda shared with Vox story that it doesn't appear that she will be able to obtain visas for her parents to come to Canada from Portland, Oregon until the next decade. Her kid, however, is a Canadian citizen, which is the golden ticket if you wanted my opinion.

Can you really become a software engineer if you were a sociology major at Pomona?
We know that is possible to have a long career in information technology even if your were a sociology major at Pomona. My father-in-law was a sociology major, class of 63 who trained to become an engineer in the army after graduation. Then he went to work for a legacy airline carrier, doing everything from throwing bags onto planes to customer service. Because he understood operations so well, he was uniquely qualified for a project manager role in IT at Delta--and he majored in sociology!!! Today's liberal arts graduates are still making their way into tech jobs, only now they are more likely to be doing it as software engineers (translation: coders).

My friend Kyle (Pomona sociology '05) talked about his journey from the liberal arts to qualifying for a growing vocation in this lovely essay for Quartz. Check it out to learn how young people are trying to adapt to the job market.

Yes, there is such a thing as grandmother hormones
And I am shameless in capitalizing on it. As a mom of a newborn, it's not enough to talk about baby stuff all day with my husband: I thoroughly enjoy recapping the day and whatever my kid has done with his grandmother (Mrs. J5). And she gobbles it up. I thought maybe it was just her being really excited. This NYTimes op-ed suggests some of it is hormones - or basically, a biological instinct. Either way, I'm glad to have the in-laws love and support on this journey. I wish them a lovely time, and can't wait to see them again.

Something to Know - 10 May

Jeff Danziger

Having read this article this morning, I just had to send one more out before taking Uber or Lyft to the train station to get to my boat ride.  This column in the NY Times just cries out how ill-prepared Trump is.   Not good.  After Cruz and Kasich dropped out, the presumptive nominee is out there trying to paddle up stream, with very little help.   Last night, on Rachel Maddow, I say a collage of all of the other guys who were running for GeeOpie leader (from Hucklberry to Kasich), and each one had nasty things to say about Trump ("unfit", etc), and now some of them are "endorsing" Trump.   The collection of negative videos and sound bytes on Trump will emphasize just how bad and divided the GOP is.  Sirinya Matute will be with you soon:


Donald Trump, in Switch, Turns to Republican Party for Fund-Raising Help
By MAGGIE HABERMAN, ASHLEY PARKER and NICK CORASANITIMAY 9, 2016

Donald J. Trump took steps to appropriate much of the Republican National Committee's financial and political infrastructure for his presidential campaign on Monday, amid signs that he and the party would lag dangerously behind the Democrats in raising money for the general election.

Mr. Trump, who by the end of March had spent around $40 million of his fortune on the primaries, has said that he may need as much as $1.5 billion for the fall campaign, but that he will seek to raise it from donors rather than continue to self-finance.

But Mr. Trump has no fund-raising apparatus to resort to, no network of prolific bundlers to call upon, and little known experience with the type of marathon, one-on-one serial salesmanship and solicitousness that raising so much money is likely to require — even if individuals can contribute up to the current limit of $334,000 at a time to the party. And he has to do it all in six months, with a deeply divided party that is still absorbing the fact that Mr. Trump is its standard-bearer.

"No one should underestimate how hard it would be for any nominee to raise hundreds of millions of dollars in a very short period of time," said Mike DuHaime, who was the top strategist for the presidential campaign of Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey.

While Mr. Trump's continued feud with the Republican establishment was likely to cheer his supporters, his intense need for money to run his general election campaign suggests the degree to which he will rely heavily on the party's existing infrastructure.

Underscoring the urgency with which Mr. Trump and Republicans will need to increase their fund-raising, some of the party's allies who spent enormous sums in the 2012 election now appear likely to stay on the sidelines in the presidential race — including the vast Koch brothers network, which had pledged to spend nearly $900 million in 2016.

Mark Holden, chairman of the Freedom Partners Chamber of Commerce, one of the Koch network's main umbrella groups, signaled that it would require a significant change in tactics by Mr. Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, for his group to open the spigot.

"If during the general election cycle, a candidate were able to garner support from the public with a positive message in support of the issues we care about, and did not engage in personal attacks and mudslinging, we would consider potentially getting involved," Mr. Holden said. "That hasn't happened yet, and there is no indication that this will happen given the current tone and tenor of the various campaigns."

The Karl Rove-led group American Crossroads is also in a wait-and-see crouch, with officials saying they have no immediate plans to buttress the Republican nominee. Both it and the Kochs' network are now expected to focus more on aiding Republicans' efforts to retain their majority in the Senate.

Republican Party officials have pressed Mr. Trump to sign a joint fund-raising agreement, which would allow him to raise money for the national committee and for his own campaign simultaneously. That, in turn, would also give Mr. Trump a defensible answer for why, after months of railing against Wall Street executives and special interests, he recently turned to a former Goldman Sachs executive, Steven Mnuchin, to corral large checks for his campaign.

Both Mr. Trump's aides and party officials were caught by surprise by the abrupt end of the primary contest last week, when Mr. Trump carried Indiana, prompting Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and Gov. John Kasich of Ohio to withdraw from the race. But the two sides have hurried to wrap up a joint fund-raising agreement, and one is close to being signed, according to people close to the national committee who were not authorized to speak publicly.

"As soon as there's unity, it's going to be very easy to do," Mr. Trump said in an interview Monday, adding that he still planned to write checks for his campaign. "I think we'll raise $1 billion," he said.

Under a joint fund-raising agreement, Mr. Trump and the party would most likely be able to raise even more than the current individual limit. But such efforts are difficult and take time: While the limits were lower in 2012, Mitt Romney raised less than $500 million under such an agreement that year, using a donor network that had taken years to develop.

In one sign of progress for Mr. Trump, Stanley Hubbard, a billionaire broadcasting executive who had donated money to efforts to thwart him, fell in line behind him. "All my other candidates withdrew, one by one," Mr. Hubbard said in an interview. "He was the last man standing."

But other donors remain staunchly opposed. Paul Singer, the billionaire financier who had backed Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, made clear at a gala Monday night for the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, that he could not support Mr. Trump and was dismayed by the likely choices in the general election.

In a three-and-a-half-hour meeting on Monday at Republican headquarters in Washington, party officials detailed for Mr. Trump's top aides the range of fund-raising operations and the other political assets at his campaign's disposal. These include the party's trove of data on voters nationwide, the hundreds of organizers it has working across the country and the dozens of employees in the party's communications shop.

Mr. Trump chose not to assemble those kinds of extensive operations during the primary season, when he prided himself on winning contests on a shoestring and ran a skeletal operation compared with many of his rivals. So he may have to lean on the Republican National Committee in a way that few nominees have in recent years.

In the lengthy meeting, Trump aides and party officials tried to forge a path forward in tandem, with Republican officials delivering the less-than-subtle message that Mr. Trump's aides were in little position to try a takeover of the group, according to a person briefed on the discussions.
 
"We can both learn a lot from each other because we both have the same objective — to defeat the Democrats in November," Corey Lewandowski, Mr. Trump's campaign manager, said after the meeting.

Mr. Trump has few aides of his own to take control of the party, which had just $16 million in cash on hand at the end of March. And Speaker Paul D. Ryan's declaration last week that he was "not ready" to support Mr. Trump has given cover to some donors who, speaking privately, said they were already dreading the prospect of becoming involved.

The Trump campaign plans to try to take firm control over the party's convention, with two senior advisers to Mr. Trump, Paul Manafort and Barry Bennett, expected to head to Cleveland on Thursday, according to two people close to the Trump campaign.

Even as his aides met privately with party officials, Mr. Trump continued to suggest in public that Republicans should embrace him, saying in a CNN interview Monday that the party, "because of me, has received more votes than at any time in its history."

With a meeting set for Thursday with Mr. Ryan, Mr. Trump did not endorse a suggestion by a well-known supporter, Sarah Palin, that Mr. Ryan should be hit with a primary challenge for saying he could not yet endorse Mr. Trump.

"I have nothing to do with that," Mr. Trump said. "Sarah is very much a free agent."

Mr. Trump is also set to meet with the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who has given him a lukewarm endorsement, on Thursday.

Mr. Ryan, meanwhile, was asked about Mr. Trump's refusal to rule out removing him as chairman of the convention, and he responded with a bit of brinkmanship, offering to step aside if Mr. Trump wanted him to.

There were other signs Monday that party unity could prove to be a hard sell.

A potential complication to Mr. Trump's convention planning surfaced, providing the first indication that Mr. Cruz would not simply hand his delegates over: Mr. Cruz's supporters emailed pro-Cruz convention delegates on Sunday to urge them to attend the convention and take control of two key committees.

Many Christian conservatives who supported Mr. Cruz and other candidates harbor deep suspicions about the beliefs of Mr. Trump, a former Democrat who not long ago supported abortion rights, and how compatible they are with long-held conservative stances on social issues espoused in the official Republican Party platform.

At the same time, Mr. Trump appeared to lose one potential vice-presidential prospect when Mr. Rubio, the former rival whom he called "Little Marco," said he had no interest in joining the ticket. Mr. Rubio said his reservations about Mr. Trump's "campaign and concerns with many of his policies remain unchanged."

--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Monday, May 9, 2016

Something to Know - 9 May

Stuart Carlson

The trend in columnists and pundits is that the GeeOpie has taken over the action and that the Republican Party is in peril.   This column by Charles Blow from the NY Times is an example.   I will be out on the high seas again (San Diego to Vancouver, and points in between, and will return around the end of May.   My daughter-in-law may interject a few of her postings on this space in the interim.

The Opinion Pages | OP-ED COLUMNIST

G.O.P. Has Only Itself to Blame

Charles M. Blow MAY 9, 2016

The Republican Party is trapped between a rock and huckster.

Now that all of their other presidential candidates have dropped out of the race, Donald Trump is the last demagogue standing. He is their presumptive nominee. Their party belongs to him. It's a YUUGE … disaster.

Now the few remaining serious folks in that party have to make a decision: support this man who, if current trends in polling hold, is likely to lose the general election by an overwhelming margin (and likely do even more damage to the party brand and hurt the chances of down-ballot candidates), or they can … wait, they don't really have another option other than to sit out this cycle and pretend that their party hasn't gone stark raving mad.

The House speaker, Paul Ryan, told CNN last week that he is "just not ready" to support Trump.

Jeb Bush posted on Facebook, "I will not vote for Donald Trump." His brother and father are both refusing to endorse Trump.

Mitt Romney, the Republicans' last presidential nominee, has also said that he won't support Trump.

Lindsey Graham said last week that he "cannot in good conscience" support Trump.

Many prominent Republicans have also indicated that they will skip the party's convention.

CNN reported last week that Erick Erickson, a conservative blogger, radio host and leader of the #NeverTrump movement, has "had a number of conversations about laying the groundwork for a third-party candidate to oppose Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the general election."

"If the delegates ratify this madness in Cleveland, many of us will look elsewhere for a credible candidate to oppose both Trump and Clinton," Erickson told CNN.

If you didn't already believe that whoever wins the Democratic nomination would be a huge favorite to win in November, a third-party conservative candidate would seal the deal.

But please, shed not a single tear for this conservative calamity. They brought it on themselves. They allowed their unhinged contempt for — and in some cases, even hatred of — Obama to drive them insane, into the arms of a walking absurdity who catered to their rage.

Now, that man — simultaneously an unbelievable joke and an undeniable threat — is on the verge of ripping the party, and indeed the country, apart (even as he insists that he's "very much a unifier").

It's not that Trump's chances of winning in November are particularly good. According to The Upshot, "If today's general election polling holds true, Hillary Clinton will easily defeat Donald Trump."

The Los Angeles Times put it in even starker terms: "To reach the 270 electoral votes it takes, the businessman and reality TV star will have to carry a number of states that have not voted Republican in well over a generation, while prevailing in several battlegrounds where, polls show, he starts behind."

No, the threat is not that he will necessarily win, but that he will further poison our national dialogue in the six months between now and Election Day, and the off chance that maybe, just maybe, a September surprise could turn his sliver of a chance into an actual victory.

This what-if, worst-case possibility that America might do the unimaginable — and elect Trump to our highest office — is severely unsettling.

Even the president, speaking of Trump at a press conference on Friday, had to impress upon everyone how serious it is that the country is flirting with disaster: "I just want to emphasize the degree to which we are in serious times and this is a really serious job. This is not entertainment. This is not a reality show. This is a contest for the presidency of the United States. "

Sure, there are some prominent Republicans tucking their tails, biting their tongues and swallowing hard as they begrudgingly announce their support for the presumptive Republican nominee.

But they no doubt see what the Pew Research Center reported last month: "Unfavorable opinions of the G.O.P. are now as high as at any point since 1992." They know that Trump will send that number sinking, as if tied to a brick.

Trump has used a toxic mix of bullying and bluster, xenophobia and nationalism, misogyny and racism, to appeal to the darker nature of the Republican Party and secure his place as the unlikeliest presidential nominee in recent American history.

That paved his path, coupled with what Jim Clifton, chairman and C.E.O. at Gallup, called earlier this year "a staggering" three-fourths of Americans believing "corruption is 'widespread' in the U.S. government." As Clifton emphasized: "Not incompetence, but corruption."

There is real pain in America, and where you sit along the ideological spectrum dictates whom you see as your Satan and whom as your savior. It appears that enough Republican voters have opted for the combo package, for which the party is likely to pay a hefty price.

Congratulations, Republicans, you've hitched yourselves to the madman-driven carriage, and it's heading for the cliff.

--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Friday, May 6, 2016

Something to Know - 6 May (Afternoon Edition)

Rob Rogers

Working off of a branded phrase from my Alma Mater, there is no way that I can not release this story from today's Washington Post:



47 not-very-positive things foreign leaders have said about Donald Trump
By Adam Taylor May 6 at 5:00 AM 
(Amy King/The Washington Post; AP; iStock

Generally, foreign leaders don't criticize other nation's electoral candidates. The logic is simple: This person might win and you don't want your witty insult from a year prior hanging over you if you have to work together. This tradition hasn't continued with Donald Trump. A range of foreign leaders past and present have publicly expressed doubts about Trump and his proposals; others have spoken off-the-record to more candidly explain their angst at the thought of a President Donald Trump.
  1. "Divisive, unhelpful and quite simply wrong." British Prime Minister David Cameron on Trump's proposed Muslim travel ban.
  2. "He changes opinions like the rest of us change underwear." Danish Foreign Minister Kristian Jensen.
  3. "His discourse is so dumb, so basic." Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa.
  4. "That's the way Mussolini arrived and the way Hitler arrived." Mexican President Enrique Peña on Trump's rhetoric.
  5. "Trump is an irrational type." Chinese Finance Minister Lou Jiwei.
  6. "You [Trump] are a disgrace not only to the GOP but to all America. Withdraw from the U.S. presidential race as you will never win." Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Alsaud.
  7. "Mr. Trump's statement only serves to show not only his insensitivity, but also his ignorance about Pakistan." Pakistani Interior Minister Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan after Trump demanded the release of a doctor who helped the CIA hunt down Osama bin Laden in 2011.
  8. "Let's be clear, Donald Trump is an idiot. I have tried to find different, perhaps more parliamentary adjectives to describe him but none was clear enough. He is an idiot." Gavin Newlands, a British MP with the Scottish National Party. 
  9. "Scary. That's how we view Trump [...] Could we depend on the United States? We don't know. I can't tell you how the unpredictability we are seeing scares us." An unnamed ambassador whose country has a close relationship with Washington.
  10. "When an apple's red, it is red. When you say ignorant things, you're ignorant." Mexico's top diplomat, Foreign Affairs Secretary Claudia Ruiz Massieu.
  11. "I think the Donald Trump phenomenon is a real problem for the United States, making their democracy look kind of weird." Christopher Pyne, minister for industry, innovation and science in the Australian government.
  12. "Whether Donald Trump, Marine le Pen or Geert Wilders — all these right-wing populists are not only a threat to peace and social cohesion, but also to economic development." Germany's Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel.
  13. "Seriously, have you ever heard me say something like that?" French far right politician Marine Le Pen on Trump's proposal to ban foreign Muslims from entry to the United States.
  14. "Given his positions, do we even want to have anything to do with this guy?" An unnamed European ambassador.
  15. "If he becomes president, it will be a disaster." Former Danish foreign minister Martin Lidegaard.
  16. "[Trump has] no regard for alliances at all." Former Australian ambassador to the U.S. Kim Beazley.
  17. "You listen to him at the debates and what he says is unsettling — he is promising to change things from one day to the next. A lot of us thought he couldn't possibly be the nominee [...] The uncertainty is very, very scary." An unnamed European ambassador.
  18. "Donald Trump's remarks are totally absurd and illogical." Ri Jong Ryul, deputy-director general of the Institute of International Studies in North Korea, after Trump suggested that Japan and South Korea arm themselves with nuclear weapons.
  19. "He is very good at making speeches, but as a politician and a world leader? No, I don't think that's a very good idea." Jimmie Akesson, leader of the far right Sweden Democrats. 
  20. "Some of the claims made during the campaign have been empty or just wrong." Peter Westmacott, former British ambassador to the United States.
  21. "A person who thinks only about building walls — wherever they may be — and not building bridges, is not Christian." Pope Francis.
  22. "The orange prince of American self-publicity." Marcus Fysh, British MP with the Conservative Party.
  23. "To start with, it was no more than a joke, and we all laughed – but now it is becoming quite concerning." Søren Espersen, a foreign affairs spokesperson for the far right Danish People's Party.
  24. "If Trump beats Hillary, that means that the scenario of the clash of civilisations created by Samuel will come to light at the hands of the candidate and [Islamic State leader] al-Baghdadi." Lt. Gen. Dahi Khalfan bin Tamim, head of general security for the Emirate of Dubai.
  25. "So Donald Trump … is ambitious but not exactly very well-informed man, I don't want to say ignorant, but he is not very well informed." Former Mexican president Felipe Calderon
  26. "The comments made are unacceptable." Irish Taoiseach Enda Kenny on Trump's Muslim travel ban.
  27. "If he met one or two of my constituents in one of the many excellent pubs in my constituency, they may well tell him he is a wazzock." Victoria Atkins, British MP with the Conservative Party.
  28. "In the past when candidates said extreme things, there always has been some seasoned, experienced adviser you could talk to, or who would speak out to soften what was said. This is not the case with Trump." Unnamed ambassador from South America.
  29. "The person you are dealing with may be a successful businessman, but he's also a buffoon." Gavin Robinson, a British MP from Northern Ireland who represents the Democratic Unionist Party.
  30. "Trump's remarks do not show a sense of introspection on what their results would bring about; he does not know the gravity of what he says." South Korea's vice foreign minister Choi Young-jin.
  31. "[A Trump presidency would be] a disaster for E.U.-U.S. ties." An unnamed senior E.U. official.
  32. "If Donald Trump was to end up as president of the United States, I think we better head for the bunkers." Carl Bildt, former foreign minister of Sweden.
  33. "[The anti-Islam rhetoric of] Donald Trump and others in Europe are really the shame of our civilization." Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama.
  34. "A successful politician would not make such statement, as there are millions of Muslims living in the U.S." Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Trump's proposed ban on Muslim arrivals.
  35. "The opportunism, unreliability and amorality that we have seen during the [Trump] campaign would be damaging for the world in general and hurt Europe in particular." Ana Palacio, former Spanish foreign minister.
  36. "Trump, like others, stokes hatred and conflations." Manuel Valls, prime minister of France, on the proposed Muslim travel ban.
  37. "I can only hope that the election campaign in the U.S.A. does not lack the perception of reality." German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier.
  38. "This nation [the U.S.] is going to fail if it goes into the hands of a crazy guy." Former Mexican president Vicente Fox.
  39. "We had such appreciation for your system when Barack Hussein Obama was elected [...] Hussein was his middle name. Hussein! He was black. We so admired that America could do something like that. Now you have a candidates who doesn't want Muslims." An unnamed ambassador from the Middle East.
  40. "Vulture." Gerard Araud, French ambassador to the U.S., in response to a Donald Trump tweet about gun control in France (Araud later deleted this tweet).
  41. "Trump solutions for me are false solutions, but they're not original. They're things that we have heard in Europe from extremist sections," Sandro Gozi, undersecretary for European affairs in the Italian government.
  42. "It's not a man I would vote for, I can tell you that [...] I hope that the American people, and I think they will, choose someone else who is better equipped for this task." Swedish Defense Minister Peter Hultqvist.
  43. "Prime Minister Netanyahu rejects Donald Trump's recent remarks about Muslims." A statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after Trump's proposed Muslim travel ban.
  44. "Saying the U.S. will no longer engage in anything that is a burden in terms of its relationships with allies, it would be almost like abandoning those alliances [...] It will inevitably give rise to anti-American sentiment worldwide." Former South Korean vice foreign minister Kim Sung-han.
  45. "Trump's statements are shocking and disgusting." Isaac Herzog, Israeli opposition leader, on Trump's proposed Muslim travel ban.
  46. "The only reason I wouldn't visit some parts of New York is the real risk of meeting Donald Trump." London mayor and British Conservative MP Boris Johnson.
  47. "The fact is, Cape Breton is lovely all times of the year and if people do want to make choices that perhaps suit their lifestyles better, Canada is always welcoming and opening." Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when asked a question about the potential that Americans could leave the country if Trump is elected.
Juan Matute- '63
Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story

--



Something to Know - 6 May


By his reply to Speaker of the House (Paul Ryan) with "I am not ready for your agenda either", Donald J. Trump solidified his presidential veneer as a hoax.  The wedge has been slammed into the heart of the GOP, and it is all angst, fury, and flames from here on out.  It seems impossible for the ego of Trump to be compliant, and he will suffer the the lack of support and unity from the very organization he has played to be its leader.   


The Opinion Pages | CAMPAIGN STOPS

Trump Tries to Take it Back

Timothy Egan MAY 6, 2016

Regrets? Sinatra had a few, but no-ho-ho such thing for Donald J. Trump so far. Apologies? Not part of the brand. Did Mike Tyson apologize to the woman he was convicted of raping? Did Ku Klux Klan leaders say they were sorry for their endorsements after Trump said he'd be good for "the African-Americans?"

The rapist and the racists are all in with the man from Trump Tower, along with Ted Nugent. Nugent called President Obama "a subhuman mongrel" and suggested that he be lynched. "Trump is as close to Ted Nugent as you're going to get in politics," he said.

But some things have to be erased, and quickly. Etch A Sketch? That was Mitt Romney's plan. (Such a choker, Mitt.) For Trump, it'll be more like a remodel, get rid of the dirty carpet, the retro-without-being-camp décor, polish the edges. Soften. Less time with "Fox and Friends" and the conspiracy nut jobs on talk radio, and more time with "The View." Ladies — he adores 'em. The press will come to him on bended knee, as NBC News did this week in their pander-cast from Trump Tower.

Still, if you were disliked by two-thirds of American women, 73 percent of nonwhites, 70 percent of voters under age 35 and 67 percent of college graduates, you'd feel some urgency to dial back his inner Sarah Palin.

So we saw the man who killed the Party of Lincoln in all his babelicious-loving glory Tuesday night, the first of 188 days until the general election. He can't possibly take back everything. How do you replace xenophobia, racism, misogyny and factual malpractice with "we're going to love each other," as he said after winning Indiana?

Simple. Count on American amnesia, our opioid.

He started the take-it-back tour with Ted Cruz. Trump had linked the senator's father to the assassin of President John F. Kennedy. He'd insulted Ted's wife, implying that she was ugly. And he'd stuck a name on him that will follow him back to the Senate — Lyin' Ted Cruz. But as of this week forward, Senator Cruz is "one hell of a competitor," and Trump wishes nothing but the best for "Heidi and their whole beautiful family."

No take-back on the Kennedy thing, though. Trump read about it in The National Enquirer, so who you going to believe? Like those phantom thousands of Muslims cheering the collapse of the Twin Towers from New Jersey. "I'm just referring to an article that appeared," said Trump on Wednesday, about tying the elder Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald. "I mean, it had nothing to do with me."

See, he's going to act presidential, as promised, but that doesn't include the temperament and judgment part of the act. It's beyond his range. Imagine Trump with the daily briefing in the White House, trying to discern a tabloid rumor from a national security threat.

An easy take-back was breaking the promise to self-finance his campaign. He claims to be a billionaire, beholden to no one. Let the beholding begin. "Do I want to sell a couple of buildings and self-fund?" he said this week, by way of announcing he's open to donations from special interests. "I don't know that I want to do that personally."

Mexican immigrants — presumably still rapists and criminals in his mind, without doubt, but unlike the convicted rapist and registered sex offender Mike Tyson, not sold on Trump. On Tuesday, he promised he would have "unbelievably great relationships with the Hispanics." One bit of advice for "the Hispanics": When the deportation squad shows up on your doorstep on Day 1 of the Trump presidency, have your papers ready.

"The blacks," or as Trump now calls them, "the African-Americans," will be a hard sell as well. They will not forget that Trump spent considerable time trying to delegitimize the first African-American presidency. He sent his investigators to Hawaii, looking to prove that the president was not an American citizen. What they found was "absolutely unbelievable," Trump said, but he's never released it. Here you should read "unbelievable" in the literal sense.

Women — big, big problem there for a thrice-married man who said his personal Vietnam was keeping himself safe from the "scary world" of women with sexually transmitted diseases. Can't take back "fat pigs" and "dogs" and "disgusting animals," or musing about punishing women who get abortions. He could borrow the wife-beater refrain, make nice and say, "I love you, baby."

Young people. Most of them, like most scientists, understand that climate change is real, and don't want their children to face planetary fury. To Trump it's a hoax. Not everyone can seal themselves off from a world of rising seas and burning forests by retreating to a gold-lined biosphere.

Muslims, no reconciliation. There aren't enough Muslim voters for a take-back of Trump's plan to apply a religious test for entry into the country. He needs the hatred, as well. And in the same never category — George Will. Never. "He's a major loser," said Trump, in his triumphant week. "It's over for him, and I never want his support."


--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Something to Know - 4 May

Stuart Carlson

Much political buzz and talk today.  Trumpy is almost there.  Bernie is still in there.   Kasich bails.   Hillary needs something to say she won.   However, my big thrill is that Ted Cruz is gone.  With the same respect and devotion given to him by so many by the likes of John Boehner, Lucifer is gone,   The RNC and the core of the mainstream Republicans are now in disarray.   Trump is now supposed to act "presidential".   There will be unexpected faces denouncing him; many from the land of the GeeOpie.   From this point on, it could be all down hill for the Donald.  His opponents are all gone, but the united party is not going to happen:


The Opinion Pages | OP-ED COLUMNIST
Ted Cruz's Bitter End

Frank Bruni MAY 3, 2016


If you listened much to Ted Cruz over these last furious months, you heard him talk frequently about "the abyss," as in what this country was teetering on the edge of. If you listened to him over these last furious hours, you heard him mention the "yawning cavern of insecurity" that motivates Donald Trump and other bullies.

Cruz should take up spelunking. He's obviously fascinated by unfathomable depths, and with his loss in Indiana on Tuesday, his candidacy for the presidency is finished, giving him a whole lot of extra time. A new hobby is definitely in order.

As we bid Cruz adieu, we should give him his due: He took a mien and manner spectacularly ill suited to the art of seducing voters about as far as they could go. He outlasted the likes of Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio. He outperformed Rick Santorum in 2012 and Mike Huckabee in 2008.

Like him, Santorum and Huckabee won the Iowa caucuses and built from there, courting the religious right with particular fervor. But they lacked the intensity of Cruz's professed disdain for Washington, which was his other big sales pitch, made at its moment of maximum potency. He peddled extravagant piety and extreme contempt in equal measure.

If that sounds paradoxical, it is, and the tension between contradictory Cruzes is what ultimately did him in.

He spoke out of both sides of his scowl, itching to be the voice of the common man but equally eager to demonstrate what a highfalutin, Harvard-trained intellect he possessed. He wed a populist message to a plummy vocabulary. And while the line separating smart and smart aleck isn't all that thin or blurry, he never could stay on the winning side of it.

He wore cowboy boots, but his favorites are made of ostrich.

Two peacocks in a pod, he and Trump, and what ghastly plumage they showed on Tuesday.

Trump somehow saw fit to bring up a National Enquirer story linking Cruz's father to the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Cruz exploded, branding Trump a "pathological liar" and "serial philanderer." He also brought up an interview from many years ago in which Trump told Howard Stern that his effort to steer clear of sexually transmitted diseases was his "personal Vietnam."

Where was this rant six months ago, when the Republican field was crowded and Cruz played footsie with Trump? Back then he was wagering that Trump would fade, and he wanted to be in a friendly position to inherit the billionaire's supporters.

But by Tuesday, Trump was the main obstacle between Cruz and the Republican presidential nomination, and Cruz has just one true compass: his own advancement.

The nakedness of his vanity and transparency of his ambition were always his biggest problem. He routinely excoriated other politicians for self-centeredness while repeatedly hogging center stage, his remarks interminable — after his Iowa victory, for example, or when he presumptuously introduced Carly Fiorina as his running mate — and his pauses so theatrically drawn out that you could watch the entirety of "The Revenant" during some of them.

He trashed "the establishment" and wore its rejection of him as a badge of honor only until it stopped rejecting him and its help was his best hope to wrest the nomination away from Trump. At that point he did dizzy cartwheels over every prominent endorsement that came his way.

Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.


He took great pride in an adversarial relationship with the media, decreeing us irrelevant, until he went in hunt of a fresh excuse for losing to Trump and decided over the last few days that it was all our fault. We didn't matter and then we did, depending on which estimation flattered him.

He purported to be more high-minded than his peers but pettily mocked Michelle Obama for urging schoolchildren to eat leafy greens. When Heidi Cruz is first lady, he pledged, "French fries are coming back to the cafeteria." Heidi Cruz is not going to be first lady, so she'll need some other platform for the promotion of calorie bombs and second chins.

And where in her husband was the humility that a Christian faith as frequently proclaimed as his should encompass? It wasn't evident when he stormed into the Senate in early 2013, an upstart intent on upstaging the veterans.

There were flickers of it on Tuesday night, as he conceded defeat not just in Indiana but in the presidential contest, announcing that he was suspending his campaign "with a heavy heart." He articulated gratitude to those Americans — no small number of them — who had buoyed him.

He went overboard in his praise of Fiorina, merely reminding us all of what an odd and oddly timed alliance theirs was. "An incredible, phenomenal running mate," he called her, as if they'd been on some epic journey. It was less than a week long. How many phenomena could she accomplish in that time?

He left Trump out of his remarks. There were no congratulations. There was no indication of whether he'd publicly back Trump in the months to come. There was nothing to purge the memory of what he'd said earlier Tuesday, when he described Trump as "a narcissist at a level I don't think this country has ever seen." Yes, we have, and so has he, every day, in the mirror.

That's why he'll undoubtedly be back to try for the presidency again. But this bid is moribund. It's time for Cruz to rest in peevishness.

--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story



Andy Borowitz

TODAY 9:54 AM

Senate Officially Mourns Return of Ted Cruz

BY 



 
CREDIT PHOTOGRAPH BY KAREN BLEIER/AFP/GETTY
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—The United States Senate declared an official day of mourning on Wednesday to mark the impending return of Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to the legislative body.

Ordering all flags at the U.S. Capitol to half-staff, the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, announced the day of mourning in a somber proclamation. "We mark this day with a deep personal sense of loss that will never completely heal," he said.


To recognize Cruz's return, which is expected to be imminent, McConnell said that the Senate would suspend all work for the day. "Ordinarily our members would welcome a day off," he said. "But not for this."

In a rare moment of consensus for this bitterly divided chamber, both Republicans and Democrats expressed their sorrow, but the news of Cruz's return seemed to cut the deepest among Republicans, many of whom now regret their decision not to endorse the Texas senator for President.

"If that bastard had somehow been elected President, we would have only had to see him one day a year, at the State of the Union," Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said. "I should have done everything in my power to make that happen. And now it's too damn late."

"We have to respect the will of the voters, but they didn't think about the devastating effect this would have on us," the usually stoic McConnell said, his voice quavering. "There's a real human cost to this."

--
****
Juan
 

Donald Trump aids and abets violence.

- An American Story