Friday, January 23, 2015

Something to Know - 23 January

Jeff Danziger

Time to reflect on a recurring issue; the Death Penalty.  The American fixation that you need to kill somebody to obtain closure and justice is absolutely shameless on one hand, and a ridiculous expense to taxpayers on the other hand.  If you firmly believe that is morally right to kill, then fixate on this.   It costs just a ton of money to put someone on death row, and then expose the case to years of litigation.  I think you can get the idea that fees paid for lawyers, law enforcement officials, medical experts, judges, etc...and the list goes on and on sucks up money out of the public treasury that could be better spent elsewhere (schools, roads, etc.).   Facts show that it cheaper to just lock someone up, and incarcerate with no chance of parole, than to go down the long and expensive road of death row.    Georgia's case here, is an example.   Proving that a person with a proven IQ of around 70 is mentally competent to be executed by the state is costing millions.   When is this going to change?:

The Opinion Pages | EDITORIAL

Georgia, Back in the Death-Penalty Spotlight

By JAN. 23, 2015

Share This Page

The modern American death penalty is beset with endless complications and contradictions, and over the years no state has embodied the full range of these as consistently as Georgia.

Death sentences handed down by Georgia provided the basis for both the Supreme Court's 1972 moratorium on capital punishment and its lifting of that moratorium four years later. In 1987, the court upheld another Georgia death sentence — of a black man convicted of murdering a white police officer — despite statistical evidence showing that the death penalty there was applied far more often when the victim was white rather than black.

Now Georgia is in the spotlight again, as it prepares to execute Warren Lee Hill Jr. Mr. Hill was serving a life sentence for killing his girlfriend when he was convicted of the murder of a fellow inmate in 1991. He is scheduled to be put to death by lethal injection on Jan. 27.

Mr. Hill was scheduled to die in 2012 and 2013, but both times his execution was stayed. In 2013, a state judge stopped it because of constitutional concerns over a new law making the source and composition of Georgia's lethal-injection drugs a state secret. Mr. Hill has long claimed he is intellectually disabled, with an average I.Q. score of 70. Seven mental health experts have all agreed with him. Three of them, all hired by the state, originally testified that he was competent, but later recanted.

This alone should make Mr. Hill ineligible for the death penalty under a2002 decision by the Supreme Court, which barred the execution of those with intellectual disabilities.

But the court left it to states to decide who was intellectually disabled, and Georgia has essentially circumvented that principle by requiring defendants to prove intellectual disability beyond a reasonable doubt — an absurdly difficult standard to meet. Only one capital defendant in Georgia has ever satisfied the test.

The Georgia standard has survived until now, but perhaps it will not survive much longer. Last year, the Supreme Court struck down a similarly rigid and unscientific law in Florida that made it nearly impossible for defendants to prove an intellectual disability. "The States are laboratories for experimentation," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court in Hall v. Florida, "but those experiments may not deny the basic dignity the Constitution protects."

So far, nothing has changed for Mr. Hill. On Jan. 20 the Georgia Supreme Court denied his request for a stay in light of the ruling in the Florida case; he has appealed that decision to the United States Supreme Court. He faces a final clemency hearing on Monday.

Mr. Hill's case is a catalog of everything that is wrong with the death penalty. It also provides the Supreme Court with an opportunity to give meaning to the logic of its decisions.


No comments:

Post a Comment