Tuesday, January 13, 2026

ICE Investigates Renee Nicole Good

The murder of Renee Good is resulting in federal agencies investigating her background to see about her connection to violent insurrection activities.   She is no more subversive than I and thousands of other volunteers who arrive on ICE raids to record and observe the actions of our federal government.  We also provide information and assistance to individuals targeted by ICE.   So rather than arrest and indict the ICE agent who committed the murder, "they" are on a campaign to smear the victim of a murder.


(CNN) — The woman killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Minneapolis last week served on the board of her son's school, which linked to documents encouraging parents to monitor ICE and directing them to training.

The documents shed new light on Renee Good's connection to efforts to monitor and potentially disrupt ICE operations – an association that federal officials have made clear is at the center of their review into the deadly incident that occurred as she partially blocked ICE agents in the street with her SUV.

But four legal experts who reviewed the documents for CNN said they largely describe nonviolent civil disobedience tactics practiced at American protests for generations – far from the sinister depiction of extremism and domestic terrorism portrayed by Trump administration officials like Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance.

"There's nothing in there that suggests attacking ICE agents or engaging in any other form of physical harm or property damage," said Timothy Zick, a professor at William and Mary Law School who wrote a book on protest law. "This is authoritarianism 101 where you blame the dissenters and the activists for causing their own death."

Three top federal prosecutors in Minneapolis resigned Tuesday over pressure from the Trump administration to focus their probe on the actions of Good and those around her, according to a person briefed on the matter.

One of the documents linked by the school appears to be a message to parents dated December 16 that begins, "Thank you to families who have been on ICE watch, helping to protect their neighbors."

The note links to a separate training document with guides on getting whistles to alert neighbors to ICE raids and contact information for a school parent offering "noncooperation training."

"ICE are untrained bullies looking for easy targets. Neighbors showing up have saved lives," that training document reads.

Another guide linked to in the training document stresses nonviolent responses to ICE agents, while also encouraging a refusal to "comply with demands, requests, and orders." It suggests "creative tactics," noting that "Crowds, props, traffic, and noise can make detentions difficult, sometimes ICE vehicles can't move ('whoops!')." It does not specifically suggest blocking operations with a vehicle.

The December 16 note, titled "School Report," was an item on the school board's meeting on that date, an agenda shows – a meeting that Good attended as one of three parents on the board of the Southside Family Charter School.

Records don't indicate that the board voted on the message. It's unclear whether it was more widely shared with families at Southside, a small charter school with a long history of progressive activism. Neither the school nor other board members who served with Good responded to messages from CNN.

Two sources familiar with the school said the "School Report" message appeared similar to past newsletters shared with parents, but neither was on the email list at the time to confirm if it was sent out.

The "School Report" message was uploaded to the school's public Google Drive about two weeks into the federal operation ramping up immigration enforcement actions in the Minneapolis area, which federal officials had launched to target the region's Somali community.

Good was partially blocking a street with her SUV on Wednesday as ICE agents operated in the area. An ICE officer who was filming Good shot her after she started to accelerate her SUV. Videos of the deadly interaction show that Good was turning her vehicle away from the agent as she pulled forward, but it's unclear whether she made contact with him before he fired.

Federal officials have claimed without providing evidence that Good was engaging in "domestic terrorism" and had been "stalking agents all day long," while some state and local lawmakers have decried that rhetoric as false and incendiary.

Good's family members have said that she and her wife had come from dropping off their son earlier that morning at Southside, about a mile and a half from where Good was shot.

Good's wife, Becca Good, said in a statement last week that the couple had "stopped to support our neighbors," adding, "We had whistles. They had guns."

Legal experts who spoke to CNN said it was troubling that federal officials appeared to be focusing on low-level violations by protesters instead of the shooting of Good itself.

Gregory Magarian, a professor and First Amendment expert at Washington University School of Law in St. Louis, said that the noncooperation tactics described in the guide could potentially violate some laws depending on the context of the situation. But overall, he said, the document endorsed standard nonviolent protest actions that don't merit an investigation by federal law enforcement.

"If the FBI has an inkling of investigating the protest organizers, it should read that and say, 'OK, there's not a fruitful path of inquiry here. Nothing about that raises red flags, nothing about that raises alarms, we should get back to doing our job,'" Magarian said. The idea that the agency would investigate protesters instead of the use of deadly force is "appalling and really dangerous," he added.

Lauren Bonds, the executive director of the National Police Accountability Project, added that attempts to investigate activists and protesters appear to have "the goal of trying to justify the officer's conduct."

Good joined the Southside school board in August 2025, a few months after she moved to Minneapolis with her wife and six-year-old son, according to board meeting notes. Her leadership role at the school has not been previously reported.

Southside, an elementary school that was founded in 1972, had 111 students enrolled last year, according to a school board document. It offers programming like student trips to the South to study the history of the Civil Rights Movement and "hands-on experience planting and harvesting" as part of a curriculum on environmental issues.

"The heart of the school's mission, social justice education, is woven into every subject and grade level," an annual report read. "By addressing social justice issues at an early age, the school encourages children to see themselves as citizen activists who can change the world and also helps children avoid internalizing the effects of discrimination."

The documents show that Good was deeply involved with the school community, even as a relatively recent arrival. Good regularly attended board meetings, with records of one meeting noting that "Renee had some questions about the future growth of the school."

The same school bulletin that encouraged activism to monitor ICE last month also shared how Good and her wife had "brought pots for us to paint" to a school event: "We will sell them at our plant sale in the spring. They look beautiful!"

Rashad Rich, a former physical education teacher at Southside who taught Good's son in his class, said the couple were familiar faces at the school.

When they dropped off their son, he "would say goodbye several times before they could leave, and then they would drive around the front of the school so they had a window where he could see them," Rich told CNN. "They'd wave. They were just awesome parents."

In the wake of Good's shooting, Rich said, teachers and staff members at the school have had their names and addresses posted on social media.

"They're getting threats," he said. "It's a scary thing right now."

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.



--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


A New Beginning - A Manifesto

 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
 that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
 their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right
 of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such 
 form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.

--
--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Something to Know - 13 January

The amount of news reporting material that the Trump administration is providing each day is an example of a sick man going wild with power.   The Executive Branch of our federal government exists to carry out the legislation that is passed by Congress.   Well, if you are familiar with our Constitution you know how the business of the people is supposed to work.   Instead, we have maniacs at the helm knocking down government buildings, launching into taking over other countries, pulling out of pacts and agreements on the international stage, and ignoring the health and welfare of the citizenry, while paying no attention to the Constitution he swore to uphold and defend.  With this all being said, he is currently overstepping and proceeding with criminal investigations and punishment of the head of the Federal Reserve and an American Patriot and hero for advising anyone who has sworn to the oath in the military that anything said that Trump does not like is subject to the discipline in the Code of Military Justice.   The enemy is within our own government; a chemically blond mole.


Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

Jan 12, 2026, 11:14 PM (8 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Today, Democratic senator Mark Kelly of Arizona sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Defense Department, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and the Navy Department for violating his First Amendment rights, the Speech and Debate Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the separation of powers, due process, the law that establishes ranks for retired commissioned officers (10 USC 1370), and the Administrative Procedure Act that establishes the ways in which agencies can make regulations.

While this sounds complicated, at its heart it's about the attempt of the Donald J. Trump administration to trample Congress and create a military loyal to Trump alone.

Defense Secretary Hegseth came to his position from his job as a weekend host on the Fox News Channel. Before that, he served in the Army Reserve and the National Guard but, as Kelly and Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) noted in a Military Times op-ed questioning Hegseth's fitness for the position, he never rose to a command position and his "track record falls short of military standards." He is the least-experienced defense secretary in U.S. history.

His attack on Kelly, who is a retired Navy officer and astronaut, began after Kelly and five other Democrats in Congress—Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), and Representatives Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), and Jason Crow (D-CO)—all of whom are veterans, released a video on November 18, 2025, in which they warned members of the military and the intelligence community that the administration was "pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens."

"Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this Constitution," the video continued. "Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders; you must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution. We know this is hard and that it's a difficult time to be a public servant. But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, our Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical."

The lawmakers concluded: "Know that we have your back, because now, more than ever, the American people need you. We need you to stand up for our laws, our Constitution, and who we are as Americans."

The video simply reiterated the law, but White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller promptly posted on social media, "Democrat lawmakers are now openly calling for insurrection," and by the next day, Trump was reposting comments that called for the lawmakers to be arrested, "thrown out of their offices," "frog marched out of their homes at 3:00 AM with FOX News cameras filming the whole thing," and "charged with sedition." He reposted "Insurrection. TREASON!" and a message from a user who wrote: "HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD!!"

On November 24, the "Department of War" posted on social media that it was investigating Kelly, after "serious allegations of misconduct." It suggested that Kelly could be recalled to active duty "for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures."

Over a photograph of the medals on his uniform, Kelly responded on social media: "When I was 22 years old, I commissioned as an Ensign in the United States Navy and swore an oath to the Constitution. I upheld that oath through flight school, multiple deployments on the USS Midway, 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm, test pilot school, four space shuttle flights at NASA, and every day since I retired—which I did after my wife Gabby was shot in the head while serving her constituents.

"In combat, I had a missile blow up next to my jet and flew through anti-aircraft fire to drop bombs on enemy targets. At NASA, I launched on a rocket, commanded the space shuttle, and was part of the recovery mission that brought home the bodies of my astronaut classmates who died on Columbia. I did all of this in service to this country that I love and has given me so much.

"Secretary Hegseth's tweet is the first I heard of this. I also saw the President's posts saying I should be arrested, hanged, and put to death.

"If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work. I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies who care more about their own power than protecting the Constitution."

Charlotte Clymer, who writes Charlotte's Web Thoughts, walked readers through Kelly's citations. They include the Navy Pilot Astronaut Badge, earned by fewer than 200 service members, and the NASA Distinguished Service Medal. As Clymer notes, the NASA Distinguished Service Medal is "the highest award bestowed by NASA and one of the rarest awards in the federal government." Since the medal was created in 1959, it has been awarded fewer than 400 times.

On January 5, Hegseth issued a formal censure of Kelly, saying Kelly's call for military personnel to refuse unlawful orders "undermines the chain of command," "counsels disobedience," "creates confusion about duty," "brings discredit upon the armed forces," and "is conduct unbecoming an officer." Hegseth said he was directing the secretary of the Navy to look into reducing Kelly's retirement grade.

Kelly responded: "Over twenty-five years in the U.S. Navy, thirty-nine combat missions, and four missions to space, I risked my life for this country and to defend our Constitution—including the First Amendment rights of every American to speak out. I never expected that the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense would attack me for doing exactly that.

"My rank and retirement are things that I earned through my service and sacrifice for this country. I got shot at. I missed holidays and birthdays. I commanded a space shuttle mission while my wife Gabby recovered from a gunshot wound to the head—all while proudly wearing the American flag on my shoulder. Generations of servicemembers have made these same patriotic sacrifices for this country, earning the respect, appreciation, and rank they deserve.

"Pete Hegseth wants to send the message to every single retired servicemember that if they say something he or Donald Trump doesn't like, they will come after them the same way. It's outrageous and it is wrong. There is nothing more un-American than that.

"If Pete Hegseth, the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in our country's history, thinks he can intimidate me with a censure or threats to demote me or prosecute me, he still doesn't get it. I will fight this with everything I've got—not for myself, but to send a message back that Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump don't get to decide what Americans in this country get to say about their government."

Kelly's lawsuit notes that the First Amendment prohibits the government from retaliating against those engaging in protected speech and that the Constitution's protection of the speech and debate of lawmakers provides additional safeguards. Indeed, the lawsuit says, "never in our nation's history has the Executive Branch imposed military sanctions on a Member of Congress for engaging in disfavored political speech."

If the court permits that unprecedented step, the lawsuit argues, it would allow the executive branch to punish members of Congress for engaging in their duty of congressional oversight.

Kelly asked the court "to declare the censure letter, reopening determination, retirement grade determination proceedings, and related actions unlawful and unconstitutional; to vacate those actions; to enjoin their enforcement; and to preserve the status of a coequal Congress and an apolitical military."

The warning Kelly and the other five Democratic lawmakers offered to military personnel that they must refuse illegal orders took on renewed meaning this evening. Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt, John Ismay, Julian E. Barnes, Riley Mellen, and Christiaan Triebert of the New York Times reported that when the U.S. military attacked a small boat apparently coming from Venezuela on September 2, 2025, the first such attack of what now number at least 35, it used a secret aircraft that had been disguised to look like a civilian plane.

The journalists report that disguising a military aircraft to look like a civilian plane is a war crime called "perfidy." "Shielding your identity is an element of perfidy," former deputy judge advocate general of the U.S. Air Force retired Major General Steven J. Lepper told the reporters. "If the aircraft flying above is not identifiable as a combatant aircraft, it should not be engaged in combatant activity." The Defense Department manual concerning the law of war explains that combatants must distinguish themselves from the civilian population and may not "kill or wound the enemy by resort to perfidy."

It explicitly prohibits "feigning civilian status and then attacking."


--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Monday, January 12, 2026

Something to Know - 12 January

BREAKING NEWS

BREAKING: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell Says He's Under Federal Investigation

The Fed chair says subpoenas and the threat of criminal charges are retaliation for refusing to set interest rates according to the president's wishes.

In a new video, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell says grand jury subpoenas served on the Federal Reserve, supposedly tied to his Senate testimony about a renovation project, are being used to intimidate the Fed for setting interest rates based on economic evidence rather than political demands.

The New York Times reports that D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeannine Pirro opened a federal investigation into Powell this past November.

Now back to our regularly scheduled programming 

Geddry's Newsletter a Publication of nGenium marygeddry@substack.com 

6:48 AM (10 hours ago)
to me


The Weaponization of Everything

How Trump turned the DOJ, DHS, and even NATO into instruments of pressure and fear

Jan 12
 
READ IN APP
 

Good morning! It's another Monday in America, and the through-line today is no longer subtle. The guardrails are being tested simultaneously, loudly, and in public, from Minneapolis to the Federal Reserve to Greenland, with a federal government that seems to treat intimidation as a governing philosophy.

We'll start with Donald Trump, who opened his latest press gaggle by warning reporters that there was "very rough" turbulence ahead, advice that quickly proved less about the weather than the state of American governance. What followed was Trump doing what he does best: threatening war, insulting the press, rewriting reality, and casually announcing geopolitical catastrophes like he was ordering lunch. Asked whether Iran had crossed his "red line," Trump said they were "starting to," warned that any retaliation would be met with force "at levels they've never been hit before," and then, without irony, claimed Iranian leaders had called him yesterday to negotiate. He said a meeting is being set up, though the U.S. may have to act militarily before the meeting. Russian-roulette diplomacy, now with an in-flight safety announcement.

When CNN asked whether Iran takes his threats seriously, Trump sneered, "What a stupid question," before launching into a greatest-hits monologue that included Soleimani, al-Baghdadi, Venezuela, and the suggestion that wars are profitable for the United States, a thought he quickly walked back only because he wanted to sound humanitarian for half a sentence. He also reaffirmed that "one way or the other, we're going to have Greenland," dismissed NATO concerns, and declared that if the alliance didn't like it, well, they need us more than we need them. Denmark, Canada, and Europe, it turns out, disagree, and that disagreement is now more than headline noise. The EU's defense commissioner warned this weekend that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland by force would effectively spell the end of NATO, with member states legally obligated to come to Denmark's defense under EU treaty mutual-assistance commitments. French President Emmanuel Macron has been urging Europeans to reject what he calls "vassalisation heureuse", the idea that Europe should meekly drift into dependence on the United States, and instead to become "more united and stronger," capable of making its own strategic choices rather than submitting to one partner's whims.

While Trump was rattling sabers abroad, the most destabilizing escalation came at home — and not from a podium. Late Sunday night, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell issued an extraordinary public video statement revealing that the Department of Justice has served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas threatening criminal indictment over his congressional testimony last summer. Powell was careful, restrained, and unmistakably direct: the investigation, he said, has nothing to do with building renovations or congressional oversight. Those are "pretexts." Powell dispensed with the usual euphemisms. He said plainly that the threat of criminal charges is the consequence of the Fed setting interest rates based on economic evidence rather than the president's preferences, an unmistakable accusation that the Justice Department is being used as a political weapon to coerce monetary policy.

That a Fed chair felt compelled to say this out loud tells you how far things have gone. Powell isn't a bomb-thrower. He's an institutionalist who has spent years absorbing Trump's abuse without public comment. But this time, the quiet channels failed. The investigation, according to reporting, is being run out of the office of Trump ally Jeanine Pirro, began months ago after Trump grew angry that rates weren't falling fast enough, and follows parallel efforts to remove Fed Governor Lisa Cook. Markets responded exactly as you'd expect when investors start questioning whether central bank independence still exists: stocks slid, gold hit a record high, the dollar weakened, and long-term bond yields rose.

Even Wall Street is now saying the quiet part out loud. Goldman Sachs' chief economist warned this morning that the criminal threat against Powell has "reinforced" concerns that Fed independence is under attack, though he expressed confidence Powell himself won't bend. That caveat matters, because Powell's term ends in May. The system may trust Powell, but it does not trust what comes next.

Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger was less diplomatic. In an emergency video, he called the move against Powell "utterly insane" and "what authoritarians do," warning that politicizing the Fed is one of the fastest ways to blow up an economy. He urged Republicans to remember they swore an oath to the Constitution, not to Donald Trump, a reminder that landed somewhere between a plea and an obituary for congressional spine.

If the Fed story shows how institutional independence is being attacked from above, Minnesota shows how federal power is being exercised on the ground. The Associated Press reports that DHS has launched what it calls its largest enforcement operation ever in the state, with agents ramming doors, forcing entry into homes without judicial warrants, and arresting people in neighborhoods already on edge after ICE shot and killed 37-year-old U.S. citizen RenĂ©e Good. Video captured agents pushing past protesters and dragging a man out of a home using only an immigration officer–signed document, which does not authorize forced entry into a private residence.

The administration's response to public outrage has not been restraint, transparency, or accountability. Homeland Security says more agents are coming. Trump has floated "absolute immunity" for officers, and officials have moved immediately to smear critics as "agitators" and "paid" operatives, the same language Trump used in his gaggle, where he described protesters as "professional agitators" and suggested he'd like to know "who's paying for it."

A short Washington Post documentary shows where that rhetoric leads. In Charlotte, North Carolina, Border Patrol agents swept through neighborhoods while volunteers known as "ICE verifiers" filmed operations, alerted neighbors, and documented vehicles, all constitutionally protected activity. At least eight of those verifiers were arrested, including one man dragged from his car and handcuffed after photographing a federal vehicle. DHS now claims that filming agents "impedes investigations," effectively criminalizing observation itself. Cameras and documenting are the real threat.

Hovering over all of this is a chilling bit of ideological signaling. ICE has been circulating a recruitment ad bearing the slogan "We'll Have Our Home Again," paired with frontier imagery and militarized symbolism. That phrase is not neutral, it traces directly to a white-nationalist song, often rendered as "By God, We'll Have Our Home Again", with roots in neo-Nazi circles and later adopted by Canada's white supremacist Diagolon movement. To most viewers, it sounds vague and patriotic, but to extremist audiences, it's unmistakable. Dog whistles work because the right people hear them clearly.

Put it all together, and the pattern snaps into focus. DHS escalates force and demands immunity when communities resist, and protesters become "agitators", witnesses become criminals, and allies become obstacles. Institutions that assert independence are told, politely at first, then legally, then forcefully, to fall in line.

Minnesota shows how bodies are treated, Powell shows how institutions are treated, Greenland shows how allies are treated, and Trump's own words tie it together. "One way or the other, we're going to have Greenland," "They won't even believe it," "What a stupid question", a refrain that underscores not just a loss of decorum but a systemic unraveling in which force, intimidation, and spectacle have become the currency of American power, a reality it's hard to fathom in a nation that once prided itself on restraint, norms, and the rule of law.



--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Andy Borowitz


In order to encourage the approach of a polarized relationship, Andy is recommending that our administration seek out a strategy luncheon with people we bearly know.   In fact, it should be all members of the president's cabinet to make this a memorable golden event.

The Borowitz Report borowitzreport@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

4:11 AM (4 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
Michael Hamments on Unsplash

NUUK, GREENLAND (The Borowitz Report)—In a friendly gesture by Greenland, on Monday a special envoy from the territory offered to meet White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.

"Our envoy has expressed a strong desire for face-time with Mr. Miller," said Greenlandic government spokesman Hartvig Dorkelson. "He'd like to meet Mrs. Miller as well."

The spokesman did not elaborate on logistics for the meeting, saying only that it would "most likely involve lunch."

"If the meeting goes well, we hope it will whet our envoy's appetite for other members of the Trump administration," Dorkelson said. "We would enthusiastically welcome JD Vance."




--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC