Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Something to Know - 7 January

Yesterday someone mentioned an article that I had seen before, but did not comment about.  I am 84 years of age, and will soon go to the next level.   Exercise has always been some part of my daily program, but recently the ails of aging and arthritis kill the desire of getting on a floor mat or pretending to enjoy the pain of commanding limbs in repetitive motions.  I enjoy bicycling, but I have lost my ability to feel comfortable on my only bike now; an ebike.   Running and jogging is out of the question (serious foot and ankle problem).   There are some stretching exercises that are very helpful, and I have a very reliable stationary bike in my home.  Where I live now, we have a beautiful swimming pool and spa, so this article addresses the issue of getting in the pool and WALKING.  To me this is more productive than swimming (I am not a good swimmer, and it's not fun).  Thanks to Sid, who brought this up in our discussion group.  So here it is:



'Stop exercising, you're killing yourself.' Not really, but try more nurture, less torture in 2026

A man in a white coat spreads his arms wide in an office.
Dr. Robert Klapper in his office at Cedars-Sinai Orthopaedics in West Hollywood. 
(Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times)
  • Pickleball causes a few hundred million dollars' worth of injuries each year.
  • There's no fountain of youth, but the closest thing is a swimming pool.

One day my left foot hurt for no good reason. I stood up to shake off the pain and tweaked my right Achilles tendon, so I headed for the medicine cabinet, bent over like an ape because of a stiff back.

Actually, I lied.

It wasn't one day. It's pretty much every day.

None of this is severe or serious, and I'm not complaining at the age of 72. I'm just wondering.

Are my exercise routines, which were meant to keep me from falling apart, slowing my demise, or accelerating it

What better time than the start of a new year to get an answer? In one poll, the top New Year's resolution for 2026 is exercising more. Also among the top six resolutions are eating healthier, improving physical health and losing weight, so good luck to all you dreamers, and I hope you last longer than I have with similar resolutions.

Instead of a resolution, I have a goal, which is to find a sweet spot — if there is one — between exercise and pain.

Maybe I'm asking too much. I've had two partial knee replacements, I've got a torn posterior cruciate ligament, a scar tissue knob on a frayed Achilles tendon, a hideously pronated left foot, a right shoulder that feels like it needs an oil change, and a pacemaker that keeps on ticking.

But I decided to get some expert advice that might be useful for anyone who has entered this glorious phase of life in which it's possible to pull a muscle while taking a nap, or pinch a nerve in your neck while brushing your teeth.

And I knew just whom to call.

Cedars-Sinai orthopedic surgeon Robert Klapper hosts an ESPN radio show called "Weekend Warrior." This lab-coated Renaissance man, a surfer and sculptor in his spare time, also weighs in regularly on the radio with "Klapper Vision" — clear-eyed takes on all manner of twisted, pulled and broken body parts suffered by elite athletes and banged-up buzzards like me.

On "Weekend Warrior," Klapper might be talking about knee replacement surgery one minute, segue to Michelangelo's rendering of the human form, and then insist that a sandwich is not a sandwich without peperoncini. It isn't necessarily all connected, but it doesn't matter.

When I emailed Klapper about my aches and pains, he responded immediately to say he's written one book on hips, another on knees and a third one is in the works with the following title:

"Stop Exercising, You're Killing Yourself."

No, he's not saying you should never get off the sofa. In a phone conversation and later at his office, Klapper said the subtitle is going to be, "Let Me Explain." He's making a point about what kind of exercise is harmful and what kind is helpful, particularly for people in my age group.

A man seated at a desk holds up a book.
Dr. Robert Klapper holds up his book about preventing hip surgery.
 
(Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times)

My daily routine, I told him, involves a two-mile morning walk with my dog followed by 30 minutes of swimming laps or riding a stationary bike.

So far, so good.

But I also play pickleball twice a week.

"Listen, I make a living from pickleball now," Klapper said. "Exercise is wonderful, but it comes in two flavors."

One is nurturing, which he calls "agercise" for my demographic.

The other is abusive, and one of Klapper's examples is pickleball. With all its starts and stops, twists and turns, reaches and lunges, pickleball is busting the Medicare bank, with a few hundred million dollars' worth of injuries each year.

I know. The game looks pretty low key, although it was recently banned in Carmel-by-the-Sea because of all the racket. I had no idea, when I first picked up a paddle, that there'd be so much ice and ibuprofen involved, not to mention the killer stares from retirees itching for a chance to drill you in the sternum with a hot laser.

"This is a sport which has the adrenaline rushing in every 50-year-old, 60-year-old, 80-year-old," Klapper told me in his office, which is the starting point in his joint replacement factory. The walls are covered with photos of star athletes and A-list Hollywood celebrities he's operated on.

"I see these patients, but they're not coming to me with acute injuries. They didn't snap their Achilles tendon … like they do in tennis. They're not snapping their ACL like they are in pickup basketball," Klapper said. "They're coming to me saying, 'My shoulder is killing me, my knee is killing me.' "

Pickleball has obvious conditioning benefits for every age group. But it can also worsen arthritis and accelerate joint degeneration, Klapper said, particularly for addicts who play several times a week.

Not that he's the first MD to suggest that as you age, walking, cycling and swimming are easier on your body than higher-impact activities. As one doctor said in an AARP article on joint care and the benefits of healthy eating, watching your weight and staying active, "the worst thing you can do with osteoarthritis after 50 is be sedentary."

Still, I thought Klapper might tell me to stop pickling, but he didn't.

"Pickleball is more than a sport to you … and all of your compadres," he said. "It's mental. You need it because of the stress. The world's falling apart.… I want you to play it, but I want you to do the nurturing exercises so you can do the abuse."

There's no fountain of youth, Klapper said, but the closest thing is a swimming pool.

OK, but I already swim three times a week.

A woman is seated in a chair next to a man seated on a table.
Dr. Robert Klapper meets with patient Kathleen Clark, who is recovering from knee surgery.
 
(Genaro Molina/Los Angeles Times)

Klapper had different ideas.

"You need to be walking forward and backwards for half an hour," he said. Do that three times a week, he told me, and ride a stationary bike three times.

Why the water walking?

"We as humans take over a million steps a year. Forget pickleball, just in … daily living," Klapper said, so I'm well beyond 72 million steps.

"Think about that," he said.

Do I have to?

Water walking will develop muscles and joints without the stress of my full weight, and that could "optimize" my pickleball durability and general fitness, Klapper said. Buoyancy and the touch of water on skin are magic, he said, but there's science involved too.

"It's hard to move your arms and legs and your body through water, and yet it's unloading the joint," Klapper said. "And finally — and this is the real X factor — when you close your eyes and straighten your elbow and bend your elbow, straighten your knee and bend your knee … your brain knows where your limbs are in space."

This is called proprioception, Klapper said. Receptors in your skin, muscles, ligaments and tendons send messages to your brain, leading to better balance, coordination and agility and potentially reducing risk of injury.

There are lots of exercises for sharpening proprioception, but the surfing doctor is partial to bodies of water. At my age, he said, my proprioception "batteries are running low," but I can recharge them with a short break from pickleball and a focus on the pool.

"You can't guarantee anything in life and medicine," Klapper said. "But I guarantee you, a month into it, you're going to feel so much better than you do at this moment."

It's worth a try, and I'll let you know how it goes.

In the pool and on the court.

steve.lopez@latimes.com


--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Andy Borowitz

Might as well enjoy our nation's disreputable reputation and immoral integrity with a bit of humor.   It seems that is about all we can do until the GOP cowards in Congress get their acts together:

The Borowitz Report borowitzreport@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

5:22 PM (50 minutes ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
Monirul Bhuiyan/AFP via Getty Images

CRAWFORD, TEXAS (The Borowitz Report)—Stating, "I never dreamed this day would come," former President George W. Bush confirmed on Tuesday that he is celebrating no longer having started the dumbest war in U.S. history.

"When you make a boneheaded mistake as epic as I did, you pretty much assume that no one will ever do something stupider," Bush said. "I gotta say, I'm pinching myself."

The former president admitted, however, that "if anyone was going to out-dumb me, it was gonna be this guy."

"Look, I might not be the sharpest tool in the shed," he said. "But even I know not to stare at an eclipse."




--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Something to Know - 6 January

An event 5 years ago; seems like it was just yesterday.   Every day since, there is always something each day that has Trump in it, and not in any way complimentary to the Constitution and the rule of law.   One can get bogged down and totally despondent if you follow each day as if it is the beginning of doom; believe me I know.   Life is like watching a really gory horror movie on TV, only we are not able to change the channel.   We need to Constitutionally find our way out of this, and rearranging the power in our Congress is one step.   There are other methods, but those are left to discuss at a later date.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Jeffrey Goldberg

January 6, 2026

(United States District Court for the District of Columbia)

View in browser

At 1:42 a.m. on December 19, 2020, Donald Trump—disturbed, humiliated, livid—posted the following message on Twitter: "Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!"

In California, David Nicholas Dempsey, a 33-year-old man-child with multiple felony convictions and a profound affection for the president, answered the call. On January 6, wearing a tactical vest and an American-flag gaiter, Dempsey came to the Capitol. Shortly before he assaulted several police officers, he shared his perspectives in an interview given while standing near a gallows. The gallows had been erected as a reminder to Vice President Mike Pence to do, in Trump's words, "the right thing."

"Them worthless fucking shitholes like fucking Jerry Nadler, fucking Pelosi, Clapper, Comey, fucking all those pieces of garbage, you know, Obama, all these dudes, Clinton, fuck all these pieces of shit," Dempsey said. "They don't need a jail cell. They need to hang from these motherfuckers while everybody videotapes it and fucking spreads it on YouTube."

Dempsey was not an organizer of the siege, but he was one of its most energetic participants. He assaulted Metropolitan Police Detective Phuson Nguyen with pepper spray. Nguyen was certain in that moment that he was "going to die," he later testified. Dempsey assaulted another police officer with a metal crutch, cracking his protective shield and cutting his head. Dempsey, who was heard yelling "Fuck you, bitch-ass cops!," assaulted other officers with broken pieces of furniture, crutches, and a flagpole. Prosecutors would later argue that "Dempsey's violence reached such extremes that, at one point, he attacked a fellow rioter who was trying to disarm him." All told, more than 140 police officers were injured in the riot, many seriously.

attended the January 6 rally on the Ellipse, at which Trump told his supporters, "If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore." Then I walked with the crowd to the Capitol. One woman, a QAnon adherent dressed in a cat costume, told me, "We're going to stop the steal. If Pence isn't going to stop it, we have to."

What I remember very well about that day was my own failure of imagination. I did not, to my knowledge, see Dempsey—he had positioned himself at the vanguard of the assault, and I had stayed near the White House to listen to Trump—but I did come across at least a dozen or more protesters dressed in similar tactical gear or wearing body armor, many of them carrying flex-cuffs. I particularly remember those plastic cuffs, but I understood them only as a performance of zealous commitment. Later we would learn that these men—some of whom were Proud Boys—believed that they would actually be arresting members of Congress in defense of the Constitution. I interviewed one of them. "It's all in the Bible," he said. "Everything is predicted. Donald Trump is in the Bible." Grifters could not exist, of course, without a population primed to be grifted.

After the riot, Dempsey returned to California, where he was eventually arrested. In early 2024, he pleaded guilty to two felony counts of assaulting an officer with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Six months later, in the summer of 2024, Trump, who would come to describe the January 6 insurrection as a "day of love," said that, if reelected, he would pardon rioters, but only "if they're innocent." Dempsey was not innocent, but on January 20, 2025, shortly after being inaugurated, Trump pardoned him and roughly 1,500 others charged with or convicted of offenses related to the Capitol insurrection. (Fourteen people, mainly senior figures in the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys movements, saw their sentences commuted but did not receive pardons.)

Of the 1,500 or so offenders who received pardons, roughly 600 had been charged with assaulting or obstructing police officers, and 170 had been accused of using deadly weapons in the siege. Among those pardoned were Peter Schwartz, who had received a 14-year sentence for throwing a chair at police officers and repeatedly attacking them with pepper spray; Daniel Joseph Rodriguez, who was sentenced to 12.5 years for conspiracy and assaulting an officer with a stun gun (he sent a text message to a friend, "Tazzzzed the fuck out of the blue"); and Andrew Taake, who received a six-year sentence for attacking officers with bear spray and a metal whip.

A day after the pardons were announced, Trump said in a press conference, "I am a friend of police, more than any president who's been in office." He went on to describe the rioters. "These were people that actually love our country, so we thought a pardon would be appropriate."

Trump had something else to say during that first press conference of his new term: "I think we're going to do things that people will be shocked at." This would turn out to be true, but unfortunately, shock does not last. Here is the emblematic inner struggle of our age: to preserve the ability to be shocked. "Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!" Dostoyevsky wrote. A blessing that is also a curse.

I understand that a review—even a short and partial review—of the past year might seem dismally repetitive. But repetition ensures that we remember, and perhaps even experience shock anew.

So, in brief: Trump has dismantled America's foreign-aid infrastructure and gutted a program, built by an earlier Republican president, that saved the lives of Africans infected with HIV; he has encouraged the United States military to commit war crimes; he has instituted radical cuts to U.S. science and medical funding and abetted a crusade against vaccines; he has appointed conspiracists, alcoholics, and idiots to key positions in his administration; he has destroyed the independence of the Justice Department; he has waged pitiless war on prosecutors, FBI agents, and others who previously investigated him, his family, and his friends; he has cast near-fatal doubt on America's willingness to fulfill its treaty obligations to its democratic allies; he has applauded Vladimir Putin for his barbarism and castigated Ukraine for its unwillingness to commit suicide; he has led racist attacks on various groups of immigrants; he has employed unusually cruel tactics in pursuit of undocumented immigrants, most of whom have committed only one crime—illegally seeking refuge in a country that they believed represented the dream of a better life. Those are some of the actions Trump has taken. Here are a few of the things he has said since returning to office: He has referred to immigrants as "garbage"; he has called a female reporter "piggy" and other reporters "ugly," "stupid," "terrible," and "nasty"; he has suggested that the murder of a Saudi journalist by his country's government was justified; he has labeled a sitting governor "seriously retarded"; he has blamed the murder of Rob Reiner on the director's anti-Trump politics; he has called the Democrats the party of "evil."

Yet, even when weighed against this stunning record of degeneracy, the pardoning by Trump of his cop-beating foot soldiers represents the lowest moment of this presidency so far, because it was an act not only of naked despotism but also of outlandish hypocrisy. By pardoning these criminals, he exposed a foundational lie of MAGA ideology: that it stands with the police and as a guarantor of law and order. The truth is the opposite.

The power to pardon is a vestige of America's pre-independence past. It is an unchecked monarchical power, an awesome power, and therefore it should be bestowed only on leaders blessed with self-restraint, civic-mindedness, and, most important, basic decency.

We have been watching indecency triumph in the public sphere on and off for more than 10 years now, since the moment Trump insulted John McCain's war record. For reasons that are quite possibly too unbearable to contemplate, a large group of American voters was not repulsed by such slander—they were actually aroused by it—and our politics have not been the same. Much has been said, including by me, about Trump's narcissism, his autocratic inclinations, his disconnection from reality, but not nearly enough has been said about his fundamental indecency, the characteristic that undergirds everything he says and does.

In an important essay, Andrew Sullivan noted this past fall that Trump's indecency is comprehensive in style and substance. "It is one thing to be a realist in foreign policy, to accept the morally ambiguous in an immoral world; it is simply indecent to treat a country, Ukraine, invaded by another, Russia, as the actual aggressor and force it to accept a settlement on the invader's terms," Sullivan wrote. "It is one thing to find and arrest illegal immigrants; it is indecent to mock and ridicule them, and send them with no due process to a foreign gulag where torture is routine. It is one thing to enforce immigration laws; it is another to use masked, anonymous men to do it. It is one thing to cut foreign aid; it is simply indecent to do so abruptly and irrationally so that tens of thousands of children will needlessly die. We have slowly adjusted to this entirely new culture from the top, perhaps in the hope that it will somehow be sated soon—but then new indecencies happen."

The subject of Trump's indecency came up in a conversation I had with Barack Obama in 2017. I asked him to name the most norm-defying act of his successor to date. Somewhat to my surprise, Obama mentioned Trump's speech at the Boy Scouts' National Jamboree earlier that year. This appearance has been largely forgotten, but it was a festival of indecency. At one point, Trump told the scouts about a wealthy friend of his who, he suggested, did unmentionable things on his yacht.

Obama, a model of dignified presidential behavior (just like nearly all of his predecessors, Democratic and Republican), understood viscerally the importance of self-restraint and adherence to long-established norms. Which is why he was so troubled by Trump's decadent performance. "You can stand in front of tens of thousands of teenage boys and encourage them to be good citizens and be helpful to their mothers," Obama said, "or you can go Lord of the Flies. He went Lord of the Flies."

We are in a long Lord of the Flies moment, led by a man who, to borrow from Psalm 10, possesses a mouth "full of cursing and deceit and fraud." For many people—government scientists seeking cures for diseases; FBI agents investigating corruption and terrorism; military leaders trying to preserve respect for the rules of warfare; and, in particular, police officers who were brutalized by Trump's army of deluded followers—these days can seem infernal. Trump's term is one-quarter over; a piece of advice often attributed to Churchill has it best: When you're going through hell, keep going.



--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Monday, January 5, 2026

Something to Know - 5 January

Trump's ineptness as a president is only exceeded by his lack of knowledge of history and the Constitution.   He is wandering off into things that are illegal and his supporting staff must be as lacking in knowledge or is to cowardly and dumb to tell him otherwise.   Donny's tool box is full of countries whose sovereignty is of no concern to him.   He wants, he gets.   

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

Jan 4, 2026, 10:43 PM (16 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Secretary of State Marco Rubio took the administration's message about its strikes on Venezuela to the Sunday talk shows this morning. It did not go well.

Asked by George Stephanopoulos of ABC's This Week under what legal authority the U.S. is going to run Venezuela, as President Donald J. Trump vowed to do, Rubio served up a lot of words but ultimately fell back on the idea that the U.S. has economic leverage over Venezuela because it can seize sanctioned oil tankers. Seizing ships will give the U.S. power to force the Venezuelan government to do as the U.S. wants, Rubio suggested. This is a very different message than Trump delivered yesterday when he claimed that the people standing behind him on the stage—including Rubio—would be running Venezuela.

When Stephanopoulos asked Rubio if he was, indeed, running Venezuela, Rubio again suggested that the U.S. was only pressuring the Venezuelan government by seizing sanctioned oil tankers, and said he was involved in those policies. When Kristen Welker of NBC's Meet the Press also asked if Rubio was running Venezuela, Rubio seemed frustrated that "People [are] fixating on that. Here's the bottom line on it is we expect to see changes in Venezuela." Historian Kevin Kruse commented: "Yeah, people are fixating on a Cabinet Secretary being given a sovereign country to run because the president waged war without congressional approval and kidnapped the old leader. Weird that they'd get hung up on that."

When Stephanopoulos asked why the administration thought it didn't need congressional authorization for the strikes, Rubio said they didn't need congressional approval because the U.S. did not invade or occupy another country. The attack, he said, was simply a law enforcement operation to arrest Maduro. Rubio said something similar yesterday, but Trump immediately undercut that argument by saying the U.S. intended to take over Venezuela's oil fields and run the country.

Indeed, if the strikes were a law enforcement operation, officials will need to explain how officers managed to kill so many civilians, as well as members of security forces. Mariana Martinez of the New York Times reported today that the number of those killed in the operation has risen to 80.

Rubio highlighted again that the Trump administration wants to control the Western Hemisphere, and he went on to threaten Cuba. Simon Rosenberg of The Hopium Chronicles articulated the extraordinary smallness of the Trump administration's vision when he wrote: "We must also marvel at the titanic idiocy of our new 'Donroe Doctrine' for it turns America from a global power into a regional one by choice. I still can't really believe they are going through with this for it is so batsh*t f-ing crazy, and does so much lasting harm to our interests."

Shortly after Trump told reporters yesterday that Venezuela's former vice president, now president, Delcy Rodríguez is "essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again," Rodríguez demanded Maduro's return and said Venezuela would "never again be a colony of any empire, whatever its nature." Indeed, U.S. extraction of Maduro and threats to "run" Venezuela are more likely to boost the Maduro government than weaken it.

In a phone call today with Michael Scherer of The Atlantic, Trump threatened Rodríguez, saying that "if she doesn't do what's right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro." Tonight on Air Force One, Trump told reporters that the U.S., not Rodríguez, is in charge of Venezuela.

Trump also told Scherer that he does indeed intend to continue to assert U.S. control in the Western Hemisphere, telling Scherer that "we do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense." Greenland is part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), meaning it is already part of U.S. national defense.

Although he ran for office on the idea of getting the U.S. out of the business of foreign intervention, Trump embraced the idea of regime change in Venezuela, telling Scherer: "You know, rebuilding there and regime change, anything you want to call it, is better than what you have right now. Can't get any worse." He continued: "Rebuilding is not a bad thing in Venezuela's case. The country's gone to hell. It's a failed country. It's a totally failed country. It's a country that's a disaster in every way."

At Strength in Numbers, G. Elliott Morris noted that military intervention in Venezuela is even more unpopular with the American people "than Trump's tariffs and health care cuts." In September, only 16% of Americans wanted a "U.S. invasion of Venezuela," with 62% against it. A December poll showed that 60% of likely voters opposed "sending American troops into Venezuela to remove President Maduro from power." Only 33% approved. Even support for strikes against the small boats in the Caribbean could not get majority support: 53% opposed them while only 42% approved.

"By the time American forces touched Venezuelan soil early Saturday morning," Morris writes, "Trump had already lost the public."

But officials in the administration no longer appear to care what the American people want, instead simply gathering power into their own hands for the benefit of themselves and their cronies, trusting that Republican politicians will go along and the American people will not object enough to force the issue. The refusal of the Department of Justice to obey the clear direction of the Epstein Files Transparency Act seems to have been a test of Congress's resolve, and so far, it is a gamble the administration appears to be winning.

Morris notes that a December CBS poll showed that 75% of Americans, including 58% of Republicans, correctly believed a president must get approval from Congress before taking military action against Venezuela. The president did not get that approval. By law, the president must inform the Gang of Eight before engaging in military strikes, but if an emergency situation prevents that notification, then the president must inform the Gang of Eight within 48 hours. The Gang of Eight is made up of the top leaders of both parties in both chambers of Congress, as well as the top leaders from both parties on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

Representative Jim Himes (D-CT) who as ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee is a member of the Gang of Eight, told CBS's Margaret Brennan this morning that neither he nor House minority leader and fellow Gang of Eight member Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) had been briefed on the strikes. Himes said: "I was delighted to hear that Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has been in regular contact with the administration. I've had zero outreach, and no Democrat that I'm aware of has had any outreach whatsoever. So apparently we're now in a world where the legal obligation to keep the Congress informed only applies to your party, which is really something."

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY)—also a member of the Gang of Eight—told reporters that he hadn't been briefed either and that the administration had deliberately misled Congress in three classified briefings before the strikes. In those briefings, officials assured lawmakers that the administration was not planning to take military action in Venezuela and was not pursuing regime change. "They've kept everyone in the total dark," he said.

Nonetheless, Himes told Brennan that he thought Trump's Venezuelan adventure would not go well: "We're in the euphoria period of…acknowledging across the board that Maduro was a bad guy and that our military is absolutely incredible. This is exactly the euphoria we felt in 2002 when our military took down the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2003, when our military took out Saddam Hussein, and in 2011, when we helped remove Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya. These were very, very bad people, by the way, much, much worse than Maduro and Venezuela, which was never a significant national security threat to the United States. But we're in that euphoria phase. And what we learned the day after the euphoria phase is that it's an awful lot easier to break a country than it is to actually do what the president promised to do, which is to run it…. [L]et's let my Republican colleagues enjoy their day of euphoria, but they're going to wake up tomorrow morning knowing what? My God, there is no plan here any more than there was in Afghanistan, Iraq, or in Libya."

Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA) was more direct: "The U.S. attack on Venezuela is illegal," he posted. "Congress never authorized this use of military force. I will vote to stop it. This is insane. Health care costs and food prices are surging. Trump's response is we're going to run another country. Batsh*t crazy."

 


--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC