Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Andy Borowitz


The Borowitz Report borowitzreport@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

4:13 AM (6 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
Getty Images

MUNICH (The Borowitz Report)—In a joint communiqué issued at the close of the Munich Security Conference, European leaders declared US Secretary of State Marco Rubio a "slightly smaller asshole" than last year's American speaker, Vice President JD Vance.

"Make no mistake, everyone here thought Marco was a ginormous dick," French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters. "But JD was still worse."

According to White House sources, Rubio was "shattered" that he had failed to equal the room-clearing toxicity of Vance's performance.

"Despite his best efforts, Marco has yet to prove that he is a flaming enough asshole to be Trump's heir apparent," one source said. "JD has set the bar very, very high."


--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


FCC Censoring Stephen Colbert AGAIN

This one just fell onto my desktop with a thud that must be acknowledged.    Colbert and others have felt the authoritarian censorship by the MAGGIES.   This newsletter concerns a Texas candidate who is showing that his state can flip to a Democratic Senator from its traditional conservative MAGA base.  Trump is very worried about losing Texas, so he has his minions out there violating the Constitution and anything else to stop this.    The CBS Stephen Colbert Show has complied, but Colbert is utilizing the streaming YouTube video to show you the interview that Trump does not want you to see.   Of course, decreeing something unfit for viewing only encourages more attention.   See for yourself.  The actual interview is at the end of this newsletter.  If you just want the interview, this is the link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A

Censoring Colbert and Talarico

Inbox

The Status Kuo statuskuo@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

8:57 AM (1 hour ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Happy Year of the Horse! Through this week, I'm running a sale in honor of the Lunar New Year. Take 20 percent off your first year's subscription to The Status Kuo! If you've been meaning to become a paid supporter, this a great time to upgrade your subscription!

Yes! Sign Me Up at 20% Off!


Censoring Colbert and Talarico

The FCC blocked CBS from airing an interview of Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico, and Stephen Colbert was none too pleased

Feb 17
 
READ IN APP
 

Happy Lunar New Year! Today's will be an abbreviated piece, as I need to get my sick dog to the vet and have extended family arriving throughout the day from the Hudson Valley, California, and Brazil to ring in the Year of the Horse! Never a dull moment….

The FCC is at it again.

Last night, Democratic Texas state Rep. James Talarico, currently running for the U.S. Senate, appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" to spread his message of hope and unity in the face of MAGA Trumpism.

But millions who tuned in would not see that interview. That's because the FCC blocked CBS, which owns "The Late Show," from airing it.

Colbert explained to his studio audience what was going on. "He was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network's lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast," Colbert said, referring to his guest Talarico.

Let's unpack what happened, then do what we know we need to do next.

Share

Colbert on censorship

We all got a little lesson in civics and FCC regulation from Colbert.

"You might have heard of this thing called the 'equal time rule,' OK? " he began. "It's an old FCC rule that applies only to radio and broadcast television—not cable or streaming—that says if a show has a candidate on during an election, they have to have all that candidate's opponents on as well. It's the FCC's most time-honored rule, right after 'No nipples at the Super Bowl," he joked, flashing an image of Janet Jackson's infamous "wardrobe malfunction."

Talk shows aren't supposed to be impacted by that rule, though. "There's long been an exemption… for news interviews and talk show interviews with politicians," Colbert noted. "Now, that's crucial. How else were voters supposed to know back in '92 that Bill Clinton sucked at saxophone? But on Jan. 21 of this year, a letter was released by FCC Chairman and smug bowling pin, Brendan Carr."

(I'll never look at Carr the same way again.)

"In this letter, Carr said he was thinking about dropping the exception for talk shows because he said some of them were 'motivated by partisan purposes.' Well, sir, you're chairman of the FCC, so FCC you."

Three cheers for that word play!

Colbert continued, "Because I think you are motivated by partisan purposes yourself. Sir, ya smelt it 'cause ya dealt it. You are Dutch-ovening America's airwaves."

Then Colbert zeroed in on what was really going on. "Let's just call this what it is: Donald Trump's administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV, because all Trump does is watch TV, OK? He's like a toddler with too much screen time. He gets cranky and then drops a load in his diaper."

Colbert not the only target

"The Late Show" isn't the only television talk show being affected by the new policy. The FCC also recently launched an investigation into "The View" which had featured Talarico as a guest.

As The Hill noted,

In January, the agency shook up its rules, which exempted some late-night and daytime talk shows from having to give equal airtime to opposing political candidates.

"Importantly, the FCC has not been presented with any evidence that the interview portion of any late night or daytime television talk show program on air presently would qualify for the bona fide news exemption," the FCC said in a public notice last month.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr followed up with a threat: "I think it's worthwhile to have the FCC look into whether 'The View' and some of the programs that you have still qualify as bona fide news programs." If not, his threat implied, they would be in violation of the equal time rule.

Barbra would like a word

The Trump White House is censoring programs and politicians it views as threats, but it's forgetting the Streisand Effect. Whenever you suppress information from the public, it only leads to greater attention.

So to help prove that, I'm posting the entire Talarico interview below, and I hope you share this post with your networks to see what the White House and the FCC don't want us to see.




--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Something to Know - 17 February

Trump is really on a campaign to trash everything he can.   It's nauseating to mention all of his coming attractions and ventures.   Suffice it to say that you will be presented with enough evidence of a seriously sick person sitting in the White House.   If he is successful in carrying out all of his fantasies, we can look forward to having to budget several billions of dollars to have his name removed from all of the landmarks he is planning to deface.   I seriously doubt that he will have the chance to carve his image into Mount Rushmore, but you never know.   We could have his gifted 747 from Qatar equipped with remote piloting and send it off, with Trump aboard, and use it for target practice until the fuel runs out.


Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

8:34 PM (37 minutes ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

On February 13 and 14, President Donald J. Trump's representatives filed three applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to trademark his name for future use on an airport. As trademark lawyer Josh Gerben of Gerben IP noted, the application also covers merchandise branded "President Donald J. Trump International Airport," "Donald J. Trump International Airport," and "DJT," including "clothing, handbags, luggage, jewelry, watches, and tie clips."

Because of the trademark filing, Gerben notes, any airport adopting the Trump name would have to get a license to use the name, potentially paying a licensing fee. Gerben emphasizes that while it is common for public officials to have landmarks named after them, "never in the history of the United States" has "a sitting president's private company…sought trademark rights" before such a naming.

In October, Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought withheld billions of dollars Congress appropriated for a tunnel between New York and New Jersey under the Hudson River, saying he wanted "to ensure funding is not flowing based on unconstitutional DEI principles." Trump told Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that he would release the funds if Schumer would agree to name Dulles Airport outside Washington, D.C., and New York City's Penn Station after him.

After a Florida state lawmaker proposed putting Trump's name on the Palm Beach International Airport, Jason Garcia of Seeking Rents today reported that the Florida legislature is currently pushing through measures to change the name of that airport to the "Donald J. Trump International Airport." The amount of money proposed in Florida's budget to make the change is $2,750,000, but Garcia notes this is likely a placeholder: the budget request is for $5.5 million.

The Trump grab for an airport named after him is just the latest grift in a presidential term that experts so far estimate has enriched the Trump family by at least $4 billion. That windfall includes merch, political contributions, and multiple cryptocurrency deals that have led, for example, to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, who manages the United Arab Emirates' sovereign wealth fund, buying a 49% stake in the Trump family's World Liberty Financial crypto company for $500 million days before Trump took office. This deal put $187 million immediately into Trump family entities and at least $31 million into entities owned by the family of Steve Witkoff, whom Trump had just named his Middle East envoy.

"President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public—which is why they overwhelmingly re-elected him to this office, despite years of lies and false accusations against him and his businesses from the fake news media," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said of the UAE deal. "President Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children. There are no conflicts of interest."

Earlier this month, Trump, his sons Don Jr. and Eric, and the Trump Organization sued the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Treasury Department for $10 billion in damages after an IRS contractor during Trump's own first term was convicted of leaking their tax information, along with that of thousands of other Americans who are not suing, to news outlets. Trump has control over the IRS, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says he will write whatever check he is told to cut. This move advances Trump's use of the presidency to enrich himself into the realm of autocratic rulers who move their country's money to their own accounts.

In 1789, when George Washington took the oath of office as the first president of the United States of America, no one knew what to expect of leaders in a democratic republic. Washington understood that anything he did would become the standard for anyone who came after him. "I walk on untrodden ground," he wrote in 1790, the year after he assumed the office of the presidency. "There is scarcely any part of my conduct w[hi]ch may not hereafter be drawn into precedent."

After watching colonial lawmakers under royal rule demand payoffs before they would approve popular measures, Washington rejected the idea of profiting from the presidency. In his short Inaugural Address, he took the time to state explicitly that he would not accept any payments while in the presidency except for an official salary appropriated by Congress.

Washington noted that the support of the American people for the new government was key to its survival. He hailed the pledges of the new nation's lawmakers to rule for the good of the whole nation, not for specific regions or partisan groups. He also predicted that the power of the government would come not from military might but from its determination to serve the needs of the public. He promised "that the foundations of our National policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality; and the pre-eminence of a free Government, be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its Citizens, and command the respect of the world."

Washington put a hopeful spin on human nature to launch the institution of the presidency, but the Framers had no illusions. They constructed the Constitution to pit men's ambitions against each other so no individual could gain enough power to become a tyrant. Later, the rise of formal political parties in the 1830s guaranteed hawkish oversight of those in power by those out of it, exposing corruption or personal vices before those exhibiting them made it to the height of the government.

As recently as the 1970s, those systems held strongly enough that Republican senators warned Republican president Richard M. Nixon that the House was about to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress for his actions during and after the Watergate break-in during which operatives tried to bug the headquarters of the Democratic National Convention. And, they told him, when the House impeached, the Senate—including Senate Republicans—would convict. They urged him to resign, which he did on August 8, 1974, the only president so far to resign the office of the presidency.

Since then, Republicans have fallen into the trap Washington warned against in his Farewell Address, putting party over country. Such partisanship, he said, would "distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration," agitate "the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms," kindle "the animosity of one part against another," foment "occasionally riot and insurrection," and open "the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passion. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another."

Fierce partisanship would lead partisans to seek absolute power through an individual who "turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty," Washington warned. And as Washington predicted, today's Republicans have replaced the prerogatives of Congress with loyalty to Trump.

They have also ignored the vices of Trump and his loyalists. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explained to a podcaster on February 12 why he doesn't worry about Covid. "I'm not scared of a germ," he said. "I used to snort cocaine off of toilet seats."

Jonathan Landay and Douglas Gillison of Reuters reported yesterday that Office of Management and Budget director Russell Vought took $15 million in unlawfully impounded money that Congress had appropriated for the U.S. Agency for International Development, which fed starving children, for his own security detail. Michelle Hackman, Josh Dawsey, and Tarini Parti of the Wall Street Journal reported that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her affair partner Corey Lewandowski travel in a $70 million luxury 737 MAX jet with a private cabin in the back.

Over all are the horrors of the Epstein files, in which Trump's name appears so often observers have suggested it is the one place that could legitimately be rebranded with Trump's name as the Trump-Epstein files.

And so, Washington's dire warnings have come true.

Profiting off his name is only part of why Trump appears to want to splash it anywhere he can: so far, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, a new class of battleships, and perhaps "The President Donald J. Trump Ballroom" where the East Wing of the White House used to be.

It's also about his legacy. In a tour of George Washington's Virginia home, Mount Vernon, in April 2019, Trump expressed surprise that the first president hadn't named any of his property after himself. "If he was smart, he would've put his name on it," Trump said. "You've got to put your name on stuff or no one remembers you."

In fact, Americans remember and revere Washington because of his reluctance to promote himself, not in spite of it. John Trumbull's portrait of him resigning his wartime commission after negotiators had signed the Treaty of Paris ending the Revolutionary War hangs in the U.S. Capitol as a moment that defined the United States: a leader voluntarily giving up power rather than becoming a dictator. Then, when voters made him president of the new United States in 1789, he refused a second time to become a king, emphasizing that he was the servant of the people and then, after two terms, voluntarily handing power to a successor chosen not by him but by the people.

As Washington predicted, the presidents Americans revere despite their faults—George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt—are those who used the enormous power of the U.S. government not for their own aggrandizement but to secure and expand the rights and the prosperity of the American people.

Trump has made no secret of wanting his image carved onto Mount Rushmore in South Dakota, where sculptor Gutzon Borglum carved the busts of Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln in the Black Hills of the Lakotas. Beginning his sculpture in 1927, Borglum chose President Washington because he had founded the nation, Jefferson because he had launched westward expansion, Lincoln because he had saved the United States from destruction, and Roosevelt because he had protected working men and helped fit democracy to industrial development.

But Trump's interest in being added to Mount Rushmore does not appear to be related to a desire to advance the interests of the American people. In September 2025 the IRS granted tax-exempt status to the Donald Trump Mount Rushmore Memorial Legacy, making it a charity that can accept tax-free donations.



--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC