Thursday, May 14, 2026

Something to Know - 14 May

Here's one for you.   This could be considered a screen play for an upcoming movie.   First, let's call it "Anatomy of a Heist" or "Constitutional Con Job".   The story line follows something like this:

Between his 45th and 47th gigs, Trump decided to sue the IRS claiming $10 billion in damages for leaking some of his tax information.   When Trump 47 starts work, he appoints and installs loyal sycophants into key positions in his cabinet and appointed offices.   The lawsuit's trail lands on the desk of a federal judge who is trying to determine the merits of a case where the defendant (IRS) and a government employee (Trump).    Deliberations and opinions are flying all over the place, and one scenario results in Trump ruling on a case where he is both defendant and victim.   Trump, along with his key appointees at the IRS and the Department of Justice, may work out an out-of-court settlement that would prevent the IRS from auditing any member of the Trump family in the future while still allowing the money to flow to Trump.   The money would be the biggest grift of his presidency.  Bigger than Trump Steaks, Trump University, Trump Bibles, Trump sneakers, etc.   The money to Trump would come directly from the Treasury Department, funded by our income tax payments.   It would be the ultimate Con job.   Right now, Trump is in China making deals, bringing family members and corporate executives along to secure deals for their businesses.   It's all about money for Trump and his megadonors.   Oh, and don't forget that China holds much of our Treasury notes, which fund our government.  Effectively, those notes will finance the $10 billion payment to Trump. Financial institutions buy those notes; they are also the entities that lend money for investments, credit cards, and mortgages.   That payment comes directly out of your wallet.    

Isn't MAGA great?



Justice Dept. Officials Consider Settling Trump Suit Against I.R.S.

One of the settlement terms under review is for the I.R.S. to drop any audits of the president, his family members and businesses.


President Trump sued the Internal Revenue Service in January over the leak of his tax returns during his first term.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times



By Andrew Duehren and Alan Feuer

Andrew Duehren covers the I.R.S., and Alan Feuer writes about the Justice Department.

May 12, 2026



The Justice Department is holding internal discussions about settling President Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service in the coming days, according to three people familiar with the deliberations, a move that could involve the government’s directly providing taxpayer funds or another public benefit to the president.

Whether to settle the suit and on what terms remains up in the air. One of the settlement options the Justice Department and White House officials are reviewing is the possibility of the I.R.S. dropping any audits of Mr. Trump, his family members or businesses, according to two of the people.

In January, Mr. Trump, along with two of his sons and the Trump family business, sued the Internal Revenue Service for at least $10 billion over the leak of their tax returns during the president’s first term. The Trumps argued that the I.R.S. should have done more to prevent a former contractor from disclosing tax information to The New York Times and ProPublica.

Given that Mr. Trump oversees the I.R.S., the agency that he is suing, the judge in the case has taken a series of novel legal steps to probe whether there is a genuine controversy between the Justice Department and Mr. Trump. For a lawsuit to be valid, the two parties must actually be on opposite sides; otherwise, the judge can throw out the case. The judge has ordered Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers — along with the Justice Department, which represents the I.R.S. in federal court — to submit briefs by May 20 explaining whether they are in conflict with one another.



White House and Justice Department officials have in recent days been exploring ways to potentially settle the suit before that deadline, according to the people.

Mr. Trump has long maintained that the federal government was weaponized against him by political opponents, and he has spent much of his second term seeking retribution against, and sometimes compensation from, those he holds responsible. But depending on its terms, a settlement with the I.R.S. could be among Mr. Trump’s most brazen efforts to bend the government to his personal will — an agenda often carried out through the Justice Department.

Mr. Trump and his family have repeatedly disregarded Washington’s ethical guardrails aimed at preventing government officials from profiting from public office, including by pushing for more than $200 million in a separate administrative case with the Justice Department. But a settlement payment even a fraction of the size of Mr. Trump’s requested $10 billion could be much larger than his other attempts at private gain, potentially doubling his net worth.

The Justice Department declined to comment. The White House referred questions to Mr. Trump’s lawyers in the case, a spokesman for whom said, “President Trump continues to hold those who wrong America and Americans accountable.”

In a previous filing in the case, Mr. Trump’s lawyers said they were in discussions with unidentified Justice Department attorneys “designed to resolve this matter and to avoid protracted litigation.” A government attorney has yet to make an appearance in the case.



A settlement in the coming days would fly in the face of efforts by the federal judge overseeing the case, Kathleen Williams, an appointee of President Barack Obama in the Southern District of Florida, to try and manage the conflict of interest in the case. Not only has she requested briefings from Mr. Trump’s lawyers and the government by next week, she has appointed a group of six well-respected lawyers not otherwise involved in the case to provide her with their views on whether Mr. Trump’s lawsuit is legitimate.

If a settlement is reached before Judge Williams has a chance to make a decision about whether the underlying lawsuit is valid, it could frustrate her, though legal experts say that her authority beyond that would be limited.

She would not likely be able to prevent Mr. Trump from simply withdrawing the suit and coming to a private agreement with the federal government. Even if the judge were to ultimately find that the settlement was collusive or reached in bad faith, she would likely be hamstrung in any effort to stop money or other benefits from changing hands.

Former government lawyers and experts see a clear defense to Mr. Trump’s suit, and do not see it as one the Justice Department would typically settle on its merits. A group of former I.R.S. and Justice Department officials filed an amicus brief in the case arguing, among other things, that Mr. Trump filed the suit too late and that his request for at least $10 billion was far too large.

Charles Littlejohn, the former I.R.S. contractor sentenced to five years in prison for the leak, provided tax return information about thousands of other wealthy Americans to ProPublica. Some of those people have also sued the I.R.S., and the Justice Department has defended those suits, in part by arguing that the government can’t be held liable for the actions of a contractor.




One of those suits against the I.R.S., from hedge fund billionaire Ken Griffin, was settled in 2024, but the government did not pay Mr. Griffin any damages. Instead, the I.R.S. made a public apology for the leak.

It is unclear or how much money Mr. Trump could receive in a settlement, or if he will be paid at all.  But protection from I.R.S. audits could prove quite valuable. I.R.S. procedures call for the mandatory audit of the president’s and vice president’s annual tax returns. The series of Times articles at the center of Mr. Trump’s suit, published in 2020, showed that he had paid little or no

income tax for years. In 2024, the Times reported that a loss in an I.R.S. audit could cost Mr. Trump more than $100 million.

At the same time, federal law prohibits the president from ordering the start or conclusion of an I.R.S. audit of a specific taxpayer.



Andrew Duehren covers tax policy for The Times from Washington.

Alan Feuer covers extremism and political violence for The Times, focusing on the criminal cases involving the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and against former President Donald J. Trump.


--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.


Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Something to Know - 13 May

Rather than continuing the miserable narrative of following Trump's follies and blunders, there are other things to share.   Russia and Putin are experiencing problems as well.  As Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic points out.   As we tire of his ineptness and destruction Trump is on his downward slide to extinction.   Despite his brutal authoritarian power over the Russian populace, Putin is on his downward slide.   His invasion of Ukraine is turning out to be similar to Trump's move into Iran in that Zelensky is exposing the Russian Bear as weak and insecure as well.   Small drones from Kyiv and grassroots military defense have poked the Bear.   Putin is rumored to be living in bunkers around Moscow in fear of assassination.   I may be speaking well ahead of myself, but authoritarians do not live forever.   In this age of technology and rapid change, as we worry about the future of authoritarians, the very enemy we fear is subtly decomposing before our eyes.  We need to influence the outcomes.


Putin’s War Comes Home to Moscow

He can no longer hide the consequences from the Russian public.

Photograph of Vladimir Putin surrounded by decorated military leaders
Vyacheslav Prokofyev / AFP / Getty


Four years ago, President Vladimir Putin offered Moscow and its business elite a de facto deal: Support my war in Ukraine, and in exchange you won’t have to think about it. In the past week, that deal was broken.

Not that Moscow was ever fully immune: As long ago as May 3, 2023, the first two Ukrainian drones to reach Moscow exploded over the Kremlin, doing no damage but revealing that the capital’s air defenses weren’t as stellar as advertised—and that the war wasn’t as far away as Muscovites assumed. Eventually, the Ukrainians shifted their efforts toward Moscow’s airports, using drones dozens of times to buzz the runways or circle the airports, deliberately creating travel chaos and expense.

Last week, the whining noise of unmanned flying objects could be heard in the city of Moscow once again. On the morning of May 7, the mayor of Moscow announced that the Russian air force had shot down hundreds of Ukrainian drones aimed at the city. Two days later, Moscow was due to host Russia’s annual May 9 military parade, a celebration linked very intimately with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, who had revived this Soviet-era celebration of Stalin’s victory over Nazi Germany and his conquest of Europe.

Suddenly, and very publicly, Russian officials appeared nervous, afraid that their parade would be spoiled. The Russian foreign minister issued a threat, promising “no mercy,” whatever that means, if Ukrainians struck the parade. The Kremlin’s spokesperson reassured Muscovites that security was tight because the “threat from the Kyiv regime” had already been taken into account. The Russian president even persuaded the American president to ask the Ukrainian president for a one-day cease-fire. Volodymyr Zelensky granted Putin’s wish, after Trump offered to broker an exchange of 1,000 prisoners of war. Zelensky then issued a magnanimous, droll decree, formally granting Putin permission to hold the parade.

The tone of Russia’s official communications has changed, and no wonder: Three years after the first drones exploded over the Kremlin, and more than four years into a conflict that was supposed to be nothing more than a brief “special military operation,” Muscovites have no choice but to think about the war. Alleged security measures—some think they are a form of censorship—had already rendered cellphone coverage in Moscow and across Russia unreliable, at times nonexistent. Although Russians had already lost access to most forms of Western social media, in April the state cut access even to the Russian-built app Telegram, as well as many VPNs. Without public internet, many physical systems, including ATMs, also stopped working. Ride apps don’t function either. These inconveniences come on top of high inflation and high interest rates that have weighed on even Russia’s wealthiest businesses and consumers for months.

The war, and the Kremlin’s anxiety about the war, is also finally now visible on the streets. Briefly, during the former Putin ally Yevgeny Prigozhin’s very short rebellion in 2023, Muscovites were told to stay home for fear of violence. For the past several days, they were once again put on high alert. According to a diplomat of my acquaintance, snipers were visible in and around Red Square, in advance of the parade, as well as soldiers with anti-drone weapons. Ordinary people were prevented from entering the city center. Photographs taken on the day of the parade show empty streets.

Russians watching the parade from farther away would also have noticed some differences. Fewer foreign leaders bothered to show up this year, and no tanks, missiles, or fighting vehicles were on display. The whole show was brief, lasting only 45 minutes. Putin looked gray, anxious. Solemn North Korean soldiers, marching alongside Russians, provided the only novelty. But their presence was a reminder of the thousands of North Koreans who had died helping Russia recapture its own Kursk province, which Ukrainian forces occupied for eight months in 2024–25. Also, as the only foreigners present in significant numbers, the North Koreans sent an ominous message about the current state of Russia’s alliances.

Of course, it was just a parade. But the anniversary matters because Putin thinks it matters. He revived the May 9 celebration in its current form in 2008, deliberately choosing to celebrate the moment of Moscow’s imperial victory, when Stalin controlled all of the territory between Moscow and Berlin. Perhaps not coincidentally, Russia invaded the former Soviet republic of Georgia later that year.

The carefully promoted cult of the Second World War started in Soviet times, but Putin has deepened and expanded it. The loss of the Soviet empire in 1989 and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 created enormous nostalgia for 1945, and Putin has been promoting that nostalgia for more than two decades. During that time, he also built that nostalgia into the fabric of the city of Moscow and other cities across Russia, adding and expanding the monumental sculptures and brutalist memorials that glorify the heroic war dead.

Now, at last, the cult of the war has caught up with him. Putin knows he can’t live up to the mythology he created, and everyone else can see that too. His unnecessary, illegal, brutal war in Ukraine has already lasted longer than the Russian war against the Nazis, killing or wounding more than a million Russian soldiers and producing neither military nor political nor any other kind of success. On the contrary: He can’t even hold a parade in Moscow without fearing that the Ukrainians will disrupt it.

That doesn’t mean his Ukraine war is over, or that Putin’s reign has ended. But it does mean that Russians in general, and Muscovites in particular, can now clearly see the contrast between propaganda and reality. A vacuum has opened up, and sooner or later something else, or someone else, will fill it.

About the Author




--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.


Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Something to Know - 12 May (again)

Our "president" goes to China today to do what presidents do.  It is an important moment for our country and much is riding on the progress of the talks and negotiations.    Think back to our experiences in school.  We studied diligently to do well in our exams.   The United States must succeed, because our reputation and ability to respond well means so much for all Americans.   So how does our "president" prepare for this meeting with the leader of China?   Read the sad story of his preparation for this.   He is entering the game without holding any cards.   His due diligence is wasted on foolishness.   He knows how not to lead.  


Geddry’s Newsletter a Publication of nGenium marygeddry@substack.com 

7:47 AM (3 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

You’re on the front lines with us. Help Support our Newsletter by Sharing
You’re reading a post made possible by paid subscribers. Each one of our readers means a great deal to us, if you aren’t able to make the leap to being a paid subscriber, consider sharing this post.

Share

Geddry’s Newsletter is a publication of nGenium, LLC. To further support us, visit our Newsletter on Substack:

Geddry's Newsletter


Cat Turd Goes to Beijing

On the eve of the most consequential summit of his presidency, the president spent three hours posting conspiracy theories from accounts called Cat Turd and RealRobert

May 12
 
READ IN APP
 

Good morning! Sometime today, the President of the United States will board Air Force One and depart for Beijing, where he will meet Xi Jinping for what may be the most consequential diplomatic summit of his presidency. He will arrive Wednesday, participate in Executive Time, closed press, as always, and then walk into the Great Hall of the People fifteen minutes before sitting down for a bilateral meeting with the most prepared counterparty on earth.

He spent last night posting conspiracy theories from an account called “Cat Turd.”

Between the hours of 10 p.m. and 1 a.m. on the eve of his departure for China, Donald Trump published somewhere between 75 and 100 posts to Truth Social. If you are the kind of person who believes that a president’s pre-flight preparation the night before a nuclear-adjacent diplomatic summit should involve, say, reviewing briefing materials or sleeping, you are going to find the contents of those posts challenging.

He began at 10:15 p.m. with a post accusing Barack Obama of orchestrating a CIA coup to steal the 2016 election. This was followed with a repost from an account called “Cat Turd” demanding Obama’s arrest. By 10:22 p.m. he had pivoted to 2020 election fraud, citing as his source an account called “Real Robert” and a publication that generously might be described as post-journalistic. At 10:23 he was demanding that Rudy Giuliani’s $150 million defamation judgment be refunded. At 10:24 he was reposting a fake John F. Kennedy Jr. account calling for Obama’s arrest as a “renegade.” At 10:30 he was calling for the arrest of Jack Smith and Merrick Garland. At 10:40 he was expressing dissatisfaction with his own Attorney General for insufficient arresting of Hillary Clinton. By 10:47 he had endorsed the characterization of Obama as “the most demonic force in politics.” Somewhere in there he posted random TikTok videos, including what appears to be a skit about a DoorDash driver.

At 1:12 in the morning, he closed the evening with a post about the reflecting pool and the failing New York Times. He boards the plane today.

The clinical term for the compulsive return to the same themes regardless of context or relevance is perseveration. The 2020 election, Obama, Hillary, Comey, the media, the reflecting pool — they cycle back with the regularity of a skipping record, indifferent to what else is happening in the world or what is scheduled for the following morning. Neurologists who study frontotemporal dementia will recognize the pattern. So will the thirty-six medical professionals who signed a letter to Congress last month alerting lawmakers that the president is unwell. Congress received that letter and, in the great tradition of institutions prioritizing short-term comfort over long-term consequence, did nothing.

The posts are timestamped. They are archived. They are public. Future historians will not have to reconstruct this picture from secondhand accounts. The subject assembled it himself.

Yesterday’s daytime posting, for context, was the companion piece to the midnight material, not paranoid, but grandiose, which neurologically is the other face of the same coin.

He reposted an AI-generated image of workers appearing to carve his face into Mount Rushmore, captioned “Things are moving along nicely for America’s 250th birthday in July!” with a sunglasses emoji. He reposted a graphic declaring him ranked among the top three presidents in American history, without specifying who did the ranking. He reposted a car bumper banner reading “Trump is without a doubt the greatest president we have ever known.” Then a split image of himself and Joe Biden labeled “The Greatest vs. The Worst.” He posted a golden-script image reading “The Greatest of All Time” against a sunset White House backdrop that has fully completed the transition from political content to devotional iconography. A saint’s card. Available at the gift shop.

This is not vanity in the ordinary political sense. The grandiosity dial and the paranoia dial do not operate independently. They are both symptoms of the same underlying process, and both were fully operational within twelve hours of each other on the day before the Beijing departure.

The daytime public schedule was its own document. At a White House maternal healthcare event, attended by Katie Britt, Dr. Oz, RFK Jr., and a pharmaceutical executive who goes unnamed because the president jovially described him as “a very fat slob” but a “brilliant man,” Trump informed the assembled medical professionals that he had become “the father of fertility” after a thirty-four-minute learning curve. He explained that drug prices were down by 500%, or 600%, or 80%, or 75%, depending on “the way you phrase the question,” and that he preferred the 500. He mused at length that junk food might actually be the secret to longevity, while surrounded by the nation’s foremost health officials. Then he riffed about renaming ICE to NICE so that news coverage would be confused. He polled the room on the 2028 presidential ticket at a maternal health event, before clarifying that the polling “does not mean you have my endorsement under any circumstance.”

At the Rose Garden police appreciation event, he described the ceasefire with Iran as being on “massive life support” with a “1% chance of living,” solicited Dr. Oz’s concurrence on the prognosis, announced he would “set aside the Iranians for an evening,” and delivered an extended meditation on how the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was refinished with industrial-grade pool coating, not paint, he is emphatic on this point, in American flag blue, selected personally from among 70 color options, at a cost of $3 million rather than the $350 million the deep state had apparently planned to spend. The coating will last fifty years.

This is the cognitive register the president is bringing to Xi Jinping: impulse, grievance, and whatever sentence fragment happened to survive the walk from the television to the Resolute Desk.

Let us be precise about what awaits him. Xi Jinping has been preparing for this meeting for months. His team has read every American court filing. They have war-gamed every leverage point. They know the tariff authority has been judicially neutered; the Supreme Court’s February ruling invalidating the president’s “liberation day” emergency powers was immediately visible to every counterparty in the world, and the global response was swift. Where Trump’s January threat of tariffs against NATO allies over Greenland rattled European capitals into emergency meetings, his April announcement of 50% duties on countries selling arms to Iran was, according to the Financial Times, “quickly brushed aside.” The world recalibrated in real time. The ability to threaten tariffs on a Friday and impose them on a Monday, Trump’s signature move, his superpower, is gone, at least for now.

China knows the 10% replacement tariffs expire in 150 days, landing squarely in the heat of midterm election season. They know congressional Republicans are quietly restive, and the midterm math, Democrats hold a five-point generic ballot advantage. They know that only 30% of American voters approve of Trump’s economic management. Very importantly, they know, as a Shanghai professor put it publicly at a late-2025 media event, that “only China can save Trump,” and that the president needs visible wins in the form of Chinese agricultural purchases that play well in the swing states he needs.

They know the ceasefire is fragile and the Strait of Hormuz situation has elevated oil prices by more than 50% from pre-war levels, driving American inflation to 3.8%, its highest in three years, reported this morning. Gas nationally averaged $4.50 a gallon today. Diesel is approaching its all-time high at $5.64. Airfares are up 20.7%. Fruit and vegetables are up 6.1%. The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas projects that if Hormuz remains closed through September, crude could hit $167 a barrel and gas $5 a gallon, with recession risk. Consumer sentiment in May fell to its lowest level on record. Fifty-eight percent of voters disapprove of the president’s handling of inflation.

Xi holds agricultural purchases, Boeing aircraft orders, and Hormuz mediation as simultaneous levers over a president who needs all three before November.

And sitting unsigned on the president’s desk is a $14 billion arms package for Taiwan. It has been sitting there for months. Xi urged Trump in February to handle Taiwan arms sales with “extreme caution.” A bipartisan Senate letter went out Friday urging approval. Xi’s ask in Beijing will not be dramatic — he does not need it to be. He simply needs Trump to continue not signing what he has not signed. Inaction is the easiest concession in the world to extract. It looks like nothing happened.

The New York Times reports this morning that use of the phrase “American decline” in official Chinese sources nearly doubled in 2025. A Beijing think tank published a triumphant report titled “Thank Trump,” arguing that his tariffs, attacks on allies and assault on American institutions had “inadvertently strengthened China while weakening the United States,” calling him “an accelerator of American political decay.” The report described what it called “the heavy and haunting toll of an empire’s evening bell.”

Such language, the Times notes, once confined to nationalist corners of the Chinese internet, has entered mainstream political discourse. Xi is not meeting Trump as a nervous supplicant seeking accommodation. He is meeting him as a man who believes, with measurable statistical support, that history is moving in his direction and that the man across the table is evidence of it.

Accompanying the president are sixteen chief executives representing a combined market capitalization that dwarfs the GDP of most nations. Tim Cook of Apple, whose entire manufacturing supply chain runs through China. Elon Musk of Tesla, whose Gigashanghai facility depends on Chinese goodwill and whose company is being systematically out-competed globally by BYD, the one Chinese EV manufacturer that cannot enter the American market because of the 100% tariff wall that is the sole reason a BYD does not sit in American driveways at half the price of a Tesla. Larry Fink of BlackRock and David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, whose Chinese market access depends on the outcome of these talks. Kelly Ortberg of Boeing, which desperately needs Chinese aircraft orders. Brian Sikes of Cargill, which needs Chinese agricultural purchases.

Jensen Huang of Nvidia was not invited. His absence is loud. The world’s most valuable company awaits approval from both governments to ship AI chips to China. That negotiation is apparently too live, too sensitive, too valuable to have its CEO in the room. Whatever is being offered or withheld on the chip question, it is not being offered or withheld by Huang.

These sixteen men and women are not disinterested advisors. They are the most powerful corporate lobby ever assembled for a bilateral summit, each with billions of dollars of Chinese market access to gain or lose from whatever is agreed behind closed doors. They have direct access to a president who has always genuflected to concentrated wealth, who will process whatever they want as patriotism because they are rich and they are telling him it serves America.

The government officials nominally providing guardrails are: a Secretary of State who was initially reluctant to come because the agenda is trade, not his domain; a Treasury Secretary who ran a hedge fund that significantly underperformed before his political elevation and whose primary demonstrable skill as Treasury Secretary has been going on television and sounding calm; and a Chief of Staff whose job is managing the principal, not the negotiation. Against Xi’s unified, disciplined, meticulously prepared team.

The president will be told by the men on the plane that what is good for Apple’s supply chain is good for America. He will believe it, because he always has, because the logic of trickle-down is the universal justification that requires no evidence and survives no scrutiny but remains perpetually available to anyone with enough money to deliver it with conviction in a private setting.

The average American, the Uber driver in Charleston whose fill-up went from $25 to $40, the working poor woman in New Jersey who cannot avoid driving to her medical appointments, the lower-income households the New York Fed describes as cutting back on gasoline while higher-income households drive unchanged, is not on the manifest.

This morning, while the inflation numbers were landing, Pete Hegseth was testifying before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee. The war on Iran, he confirmed, has now cost $29 billion, up from the $25 billion cited two weeks ago, because of “updated repair and replacement of equipment costs.” Democratic Senator Mark Kelly said on Sunday that American inventories of Tomahawk cruise missiles, Army Tactical Missile Systems, SM-3 interceptors, THAAD rounds and Patriot missiles had been severely drawn down during the conflict, and that replenishment could take years. As in years.

Hegseth described the munitions concern as “foolishly and unhelpfully overstated,” which is what you say when the concern is accurate and you do not want to say so in public. He described the mission as “sacred.” He said the Pentagon has “a plan to escalate if necessary.”

Xi’s team reads congressional testimony. The president who arrives in Beijing Thursday does so with drawn-down munitions stocks, a judicially constrained tariff regime, 3.8% inflation, a fragile ceasefire, an unsigned arms package for Taiwan, and a delegation of CEOs whose interests are not America’s interests. He arrives in Xi’s physical environment, in a schedule that puts the state banquet at what his body will register as 6 in the morning after crossing thirteen time zones. He arrives having spent the night before departure posting Obama coup theories from an account called Cat Turd.

Polymarket this morning puts the probability of the visit happening at 99%. The market has priced in the visit. Nobody can price in what happens inside it.

What is remarkable about this particular moment in American history is how thoroughly it is documenting itself. The Truth Social posts are timestamped and archived. The Rose Garden transcript is public. The fertility event transcript is public. The Hegseth testimony, inflation data, the delegation list is public. The Beijing schedule, with its revealing time zone annotations, is public. The FT on the tariff superpower. The NYT on Chinese perceptions of American decline. The letter from thirty-six medical professionals to Congress. All of it is public, permanent, and searchable.

Future historians will not struggle to reconstruct what was happening in May of 2026 or what condition the president was in or what interests were represented on Air Force One or what awaited him in Beijing. The record is complete. The subject assembled much of it himself, voluntarily, on a platform he created specifically so that no one could stop him.

At 1:12 in the morning, on the eve of the most important diplomatic trip of his presidency, he posted about the reflecting pool.

At some point today, he boards the plane.




--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.