Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Something to Know - 11 March

Today's quotation:
"The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people."
- Karl Marx

Today's Music:



Looking for more peaceful and relevant issues, we can discuss the presence of renewable energy.   European countries are rapidly shifting toward renewable energy, with over 49% of EU electricity generated from renewables by late 2025.   Sweden (66.4%), Finland (50.8%), and Denmark (44.9%) lead in total consumption, driven by hydro, wind, and bioenergy. The EU aims for 42.5%–45% renewable energy by 2030, with wind and solar dominating growth.   Most European nations benefit more from developing renewables than relying on sources like Russia, given its detrimental political system.   Spain is currently positioned to declare its own sovereign independence from alliances that foster dependence on fossil fuels.   As a dime-store conspiracy theorist, I would say that Trump would love to see European countries fully dependent on Russia for energy so that he and Putin would have a hegemonic lever in world affairs.  Without dependence on Russian energy, Moscow would have little to bargain with in an open economy.    In any event, Spain is an example of energy independence.   While wind farms have undesirable characteristics, wind is much cleaner than fossil fuels (oil and coal).   To put the differences in perspective, if you were having a large barbecue with many large cuts of meat in a closed building, would you rather cook with electricity or charcoal?   I doubt if you would want to pull your Weber barbecue into the kitchen and slow cook for several hours; you and your guests would probably die from the harmful pollution and gases.    The same holds true for a city or small community.

European countries are rapidly shifting toward renewable energy, with over 49% of EU electricity generated from renewables by late 2025.   Sweden (66.4%), Finland (50.8%), and Denmark (44.9%) lead in total consumption, driven by hydro, wind, and bioenergy. The EU aims for 42.5%–45% renewable energy by 2030, with wind and solar dominating growth.

THE ATLANTIC MAGAZINE

Spain's Wind-Farm Bargain

Renewable-energy projects can boost the economy of a rural town—if the community has a say in development.

Wind turbines in the Spanish countryside near Higueruela
Cristina Arias / Cover / Getty
March 10, 2026, 1:46 PM ET
Wind turbines in the Spanish countryside near Higueruela
Listen1.0x

Go looking for wind farms in Spain, and you might quickly end up in Castilla–La Mancha, a region southeast of Madrid. This is the place where Don Quixote, Miquel de Cervantes's delusional Man of La Mancha, attacked small wooden windmills he perceived as fierce giants and where today giant wind turbines have become an embedded part of the landscape.

There, I met Mayor Isabel Martínez Arnedo, who has run the town of Higueruela since 2019. The region's distinctive wind whipped her dark curls as she stepped out of her car. "Look!" she said in Spanish. "Windmills, windmills, windmills." They were lined up along a ridge at the edge of the small rural town, blades spinning high atop pale-blue towers. A verdant valley lay below, and beyond that, another ridge was crowned with more turbines. When the town's wind farms were first built, more than 25 years ago, "this was seen as futuristic," she told me. She was just 23 years old then, and it was the largest wind farm in Europe, the second largest in the world. Since that time, she said, she has come to believe that renewable-energy projects can save a dying town, as long as it has a guiding role in their implementation.

In the United States, views on renewable-energy projects are fraught. Adoption has been exponential; so has resistance. Last year, President Trump signed a bill that gutted support for projects, and he holds a particular animus toward wind power. Efforts to shut down renewable-energy projects are under way in every state except Alaska. Communities object to renewables for a variety of reasons, researchers from MIT found—including concerns about public and environmental health, diminished property values, and lack of public participation—and that opposition can prioritize such values even over possible economic gain.

In the past six years, by contrast, Spain has doubled its wind and solar capacity and reduced its dependence on gas power dramatically. Renewables account for about 16 percent of the energy mix in the U.S., whereas more than half of Spain's energy now comes from them as it races toward the goal of climate neutrality by 2050. Spain's economy is booming, and many consider lower energy costs a contributing factor. Though I found pockets of resistance to the shift, most people I spoke with during three months of reporting across the country recognized Spain's role in contributing to the fight against climate change.

If the global shift to more clean energy is irreversible, as many economic and technological indicators suggest, then American rollbacks seem destined to cause more problems than they solve. At the same time, renewable development can radically alter landscapes, as in India, where I'd reported on how one of the world's largest solar farms took up 13,000 acres, surrounding five small villages that remain like stranded islands. Was there a way to develop renewables that worked better for the communities in which they're located? Perhaps Higueruela, as an early wind-energy adopter, could offer a lesson.


When the wind farm arrived, the municipality of Higueruela was dying. Young people left to study and find work and never returned. In 1960, the town had about 3,500 citizens. By 2000, there were just over 1,000. This "great emptying" is widespread in rural parts of Spain, as it is in rural America. If the wind park was futuristic, it also helped the town imagine a future in which young people would not leave, Martínez Arnedo told me.


Opportunity often depends on money, and the windfall from wind energy delivered it. Taxes on the renewable-energy companies and leasing fees transformed Higueruela's economics, Martínez Arnedo said: Of its annual budget, roughly 40 percent now comes directly from the presence of wind energy. A few locals do work for Iberdrola, the company that manages the wind farms, or have started businesses that directly relate to the industry, such as a turbine-oil-changing business that now works regionally. But most of the jobs grew out of the broader ecosystem stimulated by the presence of renewables, the mayor said.

Over 20 years, using its boosted revenue, the town built a library and a youth center; the elementary school added sports, music, English, and dancing. The town now operates a bus that carries secondary schoolchildren to a larger town 22 kilometers away, and a free bus to Albacete, a small city 50 kilometers away, so access to higher education is possible without having to move away. For adults, community offerings include Pilates and painting. Higueruela offers support to help seniors stay in their homes, and when they can't, they can move to the El Jardín Senior Center on the town square, which opened in 2006 and employs 100 locals, many of them women who might struggle to find employment in more industrial, male-dominated sectors. Although electricity grids are too complicated to pass along free or discounted power to locals, the town now provides up to 2,000 euros to install rooftop solar and improve home insulation to bring energy bills down. Without the wind farms, the town would not be able to have all of these services and facilities, the mayor told me.

Each of these offerings also translates into jobs, and traditional agriculture has continued unabated beneath the wind turbines. Though the town's population is not rising, it is sustaining itself. Young people who stayed are now having babies. "We have a group of children," the mayor told me, of her students at the elementary school, where she teaches. "We call them Generation Wind."

Higueruela is not unique. Cláudia Serra-Sala, an economist at the University of Girona, collected budget data from 1994 to 2022 to see how Spanish wind farms change municipal finances and found, on average, a 45 percent increase in revenue per capita. The funds buoyed towns and served as a positive feedback loop of development, the way bringing a railroad to town once did.

Wind energy has its critics in Spain. In the lowlands of Higueruela, I met Lucas del las Heras and Pablo Jutglá Monedon, avid birders who live in the area, although not Higueruela itself, and are members of the conservation cooperative Dendros. As we watched European red-rumped swallows and marsh harriers swoop in front of us, they argued that wind farms are a land grab that are wrecking vistas and harming biodiversity. Best practices—including community input during initial planning and avoiding biodiverse hot spots such as Natura 2000 areas, a European network of valuable habitats—are not always required, or followed. The Ukraine war deepened Spain's aggressive push toward renewables and energy independence, and the men from Dendros and others I spoke with felt that environmental protections were being left by the wayside.

These complaints all have truth to them. Electricity can seem like a bit of a magic trick, but every watt of energy comes from somewhere. That ridge where I stood with the mayor was far from pristine—we walked amid Moorish ruins that lay in the turbines' shadow—but without the wind generators, Higueruela's vista would have maintained a timeless bucolic aura.

At the same time, the fossil-fuel-production system has costs, too, not least the grave environmental and health impacts on communities, which differ substantively from the impacts of a solar or wind farm. A 2023 World Resources Institute report, for instance, found that nearly half of people living in U.S. communities historically based on oil, coal, and gas economies were in areas identified as disadvantaged, plagued by air pollution, poverty, and health problems.xThe current scale of fossil-fuel burning is also disrupting entire Earth-system functions, which in turn drives fuel demand (as people try to stay warm or cool) and exacerbates the kind of extreme weather that can destroy communities and transform ecosystems. Spain is already experiencing heat waves and the whiplash of drought and flood. Outside Sevilla, the town of Carmona, in Andalusia, is a place so picturesque that it's being considered as a UNESCO World Heritage site, yet it is embracing solar farms. "If you do not put in renewable energy, it is true, there is the most beautiful field," Carmona's mayor, Juan Avila, told me. "But why do you need the most beautiful field if later it does not rain?"

Still, even willing towns have their limits. A few years ago, Iberdrola, the energy company, proposed a hybrid project in Higueruela, adding solar to the wind-energy mix. It wanted to use "the most fertile lands of Higueruela," Martínez Arnedo told me. "We said no." Instead, the town and Iberdrola are exploring the possibility of replacing the 243 existing turbines with just 63 much larger ones, and still generate the same amount of power.

The possibility of local benefits from renewables is not confined to Spain. While reporting on renewables years ago in Texas, I learned that Sweetwater—another town that adopted wind energy early and eagerly (and with Republican support)—had increased its tax base fivefold and channeled the money into civic improvements. But that was before energy production in the United States became so politicized. Martínez Arnedo told me that, for a town to benefit from renewable development, "in that mediation between the companies that want to eat the municipalities and the municipalities themselves, you have to look for a balance." Many Americans seem unwilling to even consider trying to find that. Change always has a cost, but any place facing the same type of downturn Higueruela experienced also has to contend with the risk of maintaining the status quo and consider whether that's even possible. A place like this one could easily end up with no wind farms, but soon enough it may not have rain and eventually no town, either.

About the Author

Meera Subramanian is a freelance journalist who writes about home, in the personal and planetary sense, in a time of climate crisis. Her work has appeared in publications such as NatureThe New York Times, and Orion, where she is a contributing editor. She is the co-author of A Better World Is Possible: Global Youth Confront the Climate Crisis, and author of A River Runs Again: India's Natural World in Crisis.



--

****
Juan Matute
RBR
CCRC


Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Something to Know - 10 March

After reading Mary Geddry this morning, and passing it on, I assumed that HCR would be a bit more pacific and sane.   I guess I was wrong.   Read it for yourself, and figure out what Trump has accomplished.   The G.I. Joe whose military experience only went as far as Cadet Bone Spurs is blowing up his Pentagon toys all over the place.    We know he is a deeply disturbed person, but why?   Is he really that screwed up on being outed by the Trump-Epstein files.?   Between those files and a deeply felt feeling that he and his party will be wiped out in the mid-term elections, thus becoming a big time loser.....is that his problem?   Well, he is our problem and now he is now a global problem.   Are we witnessing the end of Democracy in the United States of America and the beginning of World War III?  It's getting real bad now.


Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

Mar 9, 2026, 10:28 PM (12 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

It has become clear that Trump had no plan in Iran other than to strike it, knock out the leaders he didn't like, and hope the Iranian people would rise up and put in place new leaders he could deal with. It was supposed to look like what happened in Venezuela in January, when U.S. forces launched a surprise military strike that enabled them to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, leaving in his place the vice president, Delcy Rodríguez, who promises to work with Trump and has given him access to the country's oil resources.

Andrew Egger of The Bulwark explains that the Trump administration didn't bother to have a theory for why the U.S. was going to war with Iran, or to explain to the American people why such a war would be a good thing, because they didn't think there was going to be a war, just a fast, hard strike that would enable the U.S. to put a new Iranian leader in place.

But the initial Israeli strikes killed most of the people the administration hoped would replace 86-year-old hardline ayatollah Ali Khamenei as supreme leader, and yesterday Iran proclaimed as his successor Khamenei's 56-year-old son Mojtaba Khamenei despite Trump's statement that "Khamenei's son is unacceptable to me." Mojtaba Khamenei is thought to be even more extreme a hardliner than his father.

Wall Street Journal national security reporter Alex Ward reported today that according to current and former U.S. officials, "President Trump has told aides he would back the killing of new Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei if he proves unwilling to cede to U.S. demands, such as ending Iran's nuclear development."

This morning, Joe Wallace, Summer Said, Rebecca Feng, and Georgi Kantchev of the Wall Street Journal wrote an article titled "The Long-Feared Persian Gulf Oil Squeeze Is Upon Us," warning that the stoppage of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has set off "the most severe energy crisis since the 1970s and [is] threatening the global economy." Ships move not only oil but also fertilizer used for crops around the globe through that strait.

On March 3, Trump offered government insurance for shipping and floated the possibility of Navy escorts for ships in the strait, but that has not been enough to restore voyages. So this morning, on the Fox News Channel, Brian Kilmeade, who cheered on Trump's attack on Iran from the television studio, told the captains of oil tankers they must simply conquer their fear and start up. "If you want to diminish the Iranian threat, if you want to make sure this ends up with complete Iran capitulation," he said, "show some guts and go through that Strait, and do it."

The spreading war in the Middle East threatens the ties between the region and the U.S. that Trump has pushed since taking office. As Eliot Brown, Georgi Kantchev, and Lauren Thomas of the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, the richest countries in the Persian Gulf last year tried to strengthen ties with Trump by pledging billions of dollars of investment into the U.S. Now they are having second thoughts. A prominent Dubai businessman posted at Trump on social media: "Who gave you the authority to drag our region into a war?" Trump had placed the Gulf states "at the heart of a danger they did not choose," he wrote.

On Saturday, Vivienne Walt of the New York Times warned that such investments have gone both ways, with U.S. tech giants like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Oracle investing in large-scale facilities across the Middle East with an eye to making the region a global center for AI. Now they are questioning the security of such investments.

Aaron Katersky and Josh Margolin of ABC News reported today that shortly after the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on February 28, the U.S. intercepted encrypted messages suggesting that Iran has activated covert operatives, or "sleeper assets," in other countries. When Eric Cortellessa of Time magazine asked Trump if Americans should worry about attacks at home, Trump answered: "I guess. But I think they're worried about that all the time. We think about it all the time. We plan for it. But yeah, you know, we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die."

Under increasing pressure over the Epstein files, the Department of Justice (DOJ) today released some of the missing documents concerning an allegation from an Epstein survivor that Trump raped her when she was thirteen or fourteen. The so-called 302 report released today concerns four separate FBI interviews with the woman. (FD-302 is the form used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to provide an official record of summarized interviews.) The DOJ's initial document drop included only the interview in which she talked about her abuse at Epstein's hands; the other interviews discuss Trump. Some of the files related to that accusation and those interviews are still missing.

The White House has responded to the pressure on Trump by posting an image of what appears to be a pilot in an aircraft under the caption "PATRIOTS ARE IN CONTROL." The Steady State, a group made up of former national security officials, explains that in Q-Anon circles, that phrase "refers to the long-standing belief that Trump and a hidden network inside government were secretly running things the entire time."

Trump has become so desperate to force Republicans in Congress to limit voting before the 2026 midterms that yesterday morning he took to social media to threaten them. He said that unless the Senate weakens the filibuster to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act over the objections of Democrats, "I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION—GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY—ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL: NO MEN IN WOMEN'S SPORTS: NO TRANSGENDER MUTILATION FOR CHILDREN! DO NOT FAIL!!!"

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) responded: "The SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0. It would disenfranchise tens of millions of people. If Trump is saying he won't sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate. Senate Democrats will not help pass the SAVE Act under any circumstances."

Senate majority leader John Thune (R-SC) does not have the votes even to make up a majority in favor of the act, let alone the 60 he would need to overcome a filibuster, and has said he will not change the filibuster to try to pass the measure.

Brian Finucane noted today in Just Security that Congress, especially the Senate, could cause other problems for Trump. Although it has so far declined to reclaim its power to rein in his military adventures, it could still do so through the power of the purse. The administration appears to be planning to ask for more money to fund the war in Iran. Congress could refuse that money or could place restrictions on it by passing laws establishing such restrictions, although Trump could veto such measures and it would take a supermajority in each chamber of Congress to override his veto.

In the midst of Trump's tanking numbers on all the issues that used to be Republicans' strength—the economy, immigration, national security—Trump spoke today to Republican members of the House at their annual policy retreat at Trump's property in Doral, Florida.

The Republican majority is now so thin that Johnson can afford to lose just a single vote on the House floor, and as of this morning, that seat seemed to be in jeopardy with Representative Tony Gonzales (R-TX) facing calls to resign after admitting to an affair with a former staffer who later died by suicide.

This afternoon, Representative Kevin Kiley of California announced he was leaving the Republican Party to become an Independent. When California redistricted the state to counter Texas's redistricting, Kiley's district became much more competitive. Kiley says that going forward, he will "have to consider" every bill "on its own merits."

This afternoon, Weijia Jiang of CBS reported: "NEW—In a phone interview, President Trump told me the war could be over soon: 'I think the war is very complete, pretty much. They have no navy, no communications, they've got no Air Force.' He added that the U.S. is 'very far' ahead of his initial 4–5 week estimated time frame. Asked about Iran's new Supreme leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who Trump has openly criticized, he said, 'I have no message for him. None, whatsoever.' Trump said he has someone in mind to replace Khamenei, but he did not elaborate. As for the Strait of Hormuz, Trump noted that ships are moving through now, but he is 'thinking about taking it over.' Trump warned Iran, 'They've shot everything they have to shoot, and they better not try anything cute or it's going to be the end of that country.'"

The price of oil had spiked overnight up to its highest level since global trade surged in 2022 after the Covid-19 lockdowns, peaking briefly at over $100 a barrel. News that the Group of Seven advanced economies (G7) is willing to consider releasing strategic oil reserves if necessary brought it down from its highs. A dropping stock market reflected the spike in oil prices. Those drops moderated after news about the possible release of strategic oil reserves, and the news that Trump considers the war ending meant the market ended up higher by the end of the day than it had begun.

But once the market had closed, Trump changed his tune, telling House Republicans, "We have won in many ways, but not enough. We go forward more determined than ever to achieve ultimate victory that will end this long-running danger once and for all." When asked at a later news conference if the war would be over this week, Mr. Trump said, "No."

This evening, Trump's account posted: "If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far. Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again—Death, Fire, and Fury will reign [sic] upon them—But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen! This is a gift from the United States of America to China, and all of those Nations that heavily use the Hormuz Strait. Hopefully, it is a gesture that will be greatly appreciated."

Aaron Rupar of Public Notice commented: "Trump is completely flailing. He didn't anticipate the economic blowback and now he's trying to undo the past 10 days and contain the damage."

As part of its apparent war on what the administration calls "narco-terrorists" in Latin America, U.S. Southern Command announced yesterday that it has struck another small vessel in the eastern Pacific, killing another six men.



--
****
Juan Matute
CCRC


Something to Know - 10 March


Quote of the Day
- The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.
H. L. Mencken--

Song of the Day
- Mary Travers of Peter Paul and Mary:   For Baby

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aGBI-XFNkE&list=RD9aGBI-XFNkE&start_radio=1


Today's Newsletter - 
Mary Geddry, as she admits, is having a meltdown.  Stay with her in this article, as she really pushes back against the misery of being caught up in the maelstrom of Trump politics.   This outburst is for Tuesday, today.   Maybe tomorrow will be different.  If not, this is a boilerplate for your average day in the future.

(Today's format is a trial on affecting change)

Geddry's Newsletter a Publication of nGenium marygeddry@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

9:12 AM (26 minutes ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Very Complete Pretty Much

Trump tries to narrate victory in Iran while markets wobble, shipping chokes, clean energy takes another hit, and the Big Lie keeps shambling forward at home.

Mar 10
 
READ IN APP
 

Good morning! From abroad, the verdict on Trump's latest war project is already coming into focus, and it is not exactly "mission accomplished." It is closer to "Operation Epic Failure," which, to be fair, does have the ring of truth. Outside the American propaganda bubble, commentators are looking at this mess and seeing what should by now be painfully familiar: a reckless, impulsive president launching military action with shifting justifications, contradictory objectives, no credible exit strategy, and the attention span of a raccoon in a casino. One minute Trump is demanding unconditional surrender, the next he is mumbling that the war could end soon, "very complete pretty much," which sounds like a man trying to bluff his way through a book report on a novel he never opened.

Iran, for its part, is not playing along with the fantasy script. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has made clear that negotiations with the United States are now effectively off the table after Washington claimed progress in talks and then attacked anyway. It sounds like a trust issue, as Araghchi put it, "I don't think talking with the Americans anymore would be on our agenda," after what he called a "very bitter experience" with the last round of negotiations. Which is a bit of a problem if your whole strategy for ending a war consists of blowing up diplomacy and then acting surprised when the other side no longer returns your calls. Trump seems desperate to narrate an ending before reality has agreed to provide one, perhaps because he can already see the markets twitching, oil surging, and the economic blowback inching closer to home. Unfortunately for him, wars do not end because he declares them over on television any more than hurricanes expand when he redraws them with a Sharpie.

There is, of course, the little complication that Trump is not the only one involved in this catastrophe. Israel has its own agenda, and Netanyahu's has not exactly been subtle. Trump may want a quick, self-flattering off-ramp before the whole thing detonates politically, but Netanyahu has spent decades treating confrontation with Iran as one of the defining obsessions of his political life. So while Trump may already be looking for a way to slap a gold-plated "victory" sticker on this fiasco and move on, his closest partner may have no intention of letting the fire die down. That is the trouble with starting wars as a joint venture between a corrupt authoritarian and a deranged showman: everyone arrives with a different marketing speech prepared, but only the missiles are real.

The practical consequences are piling up at sea, where reality has once again refused to cooperate with macho nonsense. Trump went on Fox and told commercial ships to "show some guts" and sail through the Strait of Hormuz, because apparently he thinks global shipping works like a bar fight in a movie. Sal Mercogliano's analysis cuts through that idiocy beautifully. Ships are not avoiding the strait because merchant mariners are timid. They are avoiding it because insurance companies enjoy boring little details like not being blown up, multiple vessels have already been struck, fuel infrastructure has been hit, and even the U.S. government's own maritime warning is essentially screaming, "avoid this area if possible." Trump is demanding swagger from civilians while his own administration is quietly posting hazard signs.

Because this administration can never resist compounding one disaster with another, the economic ripples are already spreading. Charter rates are exploding and oil prices are spiking. Gulf producers are rattling around with force majeure warnings, while strategic reserves are suddenly back in the conversation, and LNG markets are tightening. Fueling disruptions at Fujairah threaten a wider shipping mess. In other words, all the people who spent years pretending that fossil fuel dependence equals strength are now getting a fresh demonstration that building your civilization around combustible sludge shipped through geopolitical choke points may not, in fact, be the masterstroke they imagined. If there were ever a case for sprinting toward clean energy, this would be it. Which brings us, neatly, to the climate portion of today's slow-motion societal breakdown.

While Trump is busy turning foreign policy into a demolition derby, he is also still sabotaging one of the few sectors actually capable of making the country more resilient. U.S. solar installations fell 14 percent in 2025, even though solar still added more new electricity to the grid than any other power source. That is the part worth lingering on: even with one hand tied behind its back by a fossil-fuel administration determined to drag the country backward, clean energy still outperformed everything else. The administration slashed programs, stalled reviews, and handed the microphone to oil-and-gas ideologues who sneer at renewables as if physics itself were some kind of liberal hoax. Batteries and other forms of energy storage, including pumped hydro, are expanding rapidly and in many cases surging to record levels because, unlike cable-news rants, they actually solve problems. They store electricity, support the grid, help households and utilities ride through outages and peak demand. They do not scream about windmills causing cancer.

If that were not enough cheerful news from the climate front, a new report highlighted by Just Have a Think has arrived to remind us that the planet may be heating even faster than many models assumed. Not just warming, mind you. Accelerating. Researchers tied to the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, Exeter, and the Climate Crisis Advisory Group are warning that Earth's energy imbalance has surged far faster than expected, meaning the planet is absorbing much more heat than it is shedding back into space. That is the sort of sentence that should send governments into a full-body panic. Naturally, most governments appear to be responding by adjusting their ties, creating acid rain in the Middle East, and pretending not to hear the alarm.

One of the most grotesquely revealing parts of that analysis is the suggestion that humanity has been running a giant accidental geoengineering experiment for decades. Dirty sulphur pollution from shipping and heavy industry helped reflect sunlight and temporarily masked some of the warming caused by greenhouse gases. Then cleaner fuel rules cut those sulphur emissions, the filthy little atmospheric parasol began to disappear, and more solar energy stayed trapped in the system. So yes, civilization managed to create a crisis so absurd that one form of pollution was partially hiding the damage caused by another. It is the kind of achievement only a fossil-fueled economic order could produce: poisoning the atmosphere while accidentally using part of the poison as sunscreen. The deeper message is that the old comfort blanket is disintegrating. The status quo is not moderate, cautious, or responsible. It is a decision to keep gambling the future on the hope that physics will show more mercy than politics ever has.

As no American morning roundup would be complete without proof that the republic is still being operated by vandals and carnival barkers even on the domestic side, we turn now to Arizona, where the FBI has subpoenaed records from the Republican-led 2021 "audit" of Maricopa County ballots, that glorious clown show funded by Trump allies, run by election fantasists, and still incapable of proving the thing it was created to prove. After years of recounts, lawsuits, conspiracy spirals, and performative outrage, they are apparently still rummaging through the wreckage of 2020 hoping reality will finally crack under pressure. It won't. That "audit" already helped confirm Biden's win. So what this looks like now is not some sober search for truth, but the federal government being dragged into a failed propaganda exercise to keep the Big Lie twitching long enough to contaminate the next election too.

Today, because there is no such thing as too much political psychodrama for one nation to endure, voters in Georgia's 14th District are heading to the polls to replace Marjorie Taylor Greene. Which is not so much a special election as a contest to determine which flavor of grievance-addled MAGA performance art gets to inherit her old seat. Trump has endorsed one candidate. Others are scrambling to prove they are just as loyal, just as furious, and just as willing to transform public service into a never-ending livestream of indignation, conspiracy, and chest-beating nonsense. Greene's own break with Trump over the Epstein files has now become part of the backdrop, meaning even in one of the reddest corners of Georgia, the succession fight still revolves around Trump, Epstein fallout, and who gets to wear the largest decorative boot on their neck while pledging total obedience. Democrats are trying to exploit the Republican scrum, but the broader spectacle remains depressingly familiar: a deep-red district holding a loyalty pageant while the country catches fire.

So that is where we are this Tuesday morning. Abroad, Trump is discovering that wars are not branding exercises and that other governments do not cease to exist when he starts improvising. At sea, global commerce is reacting like global commerce tends to react when missiles start flying near chokepoints. At home, he is still kneecapping clean energy while the climate accelerates, still feeding election lies long after they have been disproven, and still exerting such a gravitational pull over American politics that even a race to replace Marjorie Taylor Greene cannot escape his chaos field. The whole picture is one of a system staggering under the weight of militarism, corruption, fossil-fuel stupidity, electoral derangement, and a political culture that keeps mistaking arson for strength.

That is where we leave it this morning: a country and a planet being yanked around by war, lies, fossil-fuel stupidity, and the sort of political malpractice that somehow still gets dressed up as leadership. If I seem a little off my game today, blame the Coquille Crud, which Marz is assuring me can be cured by a brisk romp. I am not convinced this is peer-reviewed medicine, but at the moment it does have the advantage of coming from a very confident dog.







****
Juan Matute
CCRC