Monday, June 1, 2026

Andy Borowitz

The Borowitz Report borowitzreport@substack.com 

4:17 AM (12 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more
Alex Wong/Getty Images

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In a last-ditch move to salvage his “US Freedom 250” concert, Donald J. Trump announced on Monday that the only remaining musical act will be Secretary of State Marco Rubio playing a kazoo.

“Quite frankly, we don’t need no-talent losers like the Commodores,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “We have Little Marco playing his Little Kazoo!”

According to sources, Rubio is taking his new assignment extremely seriously, spending hours practicing the kazoo in the Situation Room.

In an official statement, Rubio declared, “I am honored to blow anything President Trump asks me to.”




--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.


Something to Know - 1 June

We again find the cheap, gold-plated facade of MAGA.   Mary Geddry really rips through the Thesaurus of uncomplimentary phrases to nail down the problem.   The pinnacle of a mentally disturbed insecure authoritarian sits atop our government.   It is a sad situation how we have allowed an individual into this seat of power which reflects the the lack of humanity and morality that exists between his two ears.


Geddry’s Newsletter a Publication of nGenium marygeddry@substack.com 

May 31, 2026, 7:10 AM (1 day ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Dumb, With a B

Trump can't explain his own insult, can't do the math on his own brag, and can't stop telling on himself, all while presiding over a widening war. A Sunday dispatch.

May 31
 
READ IN APP
 

Good morning. Coffee up, helmets on.

We begin today with Donald Trump once again attempting to prove his cognitive brilliance by demonstrating, in public, that he does not understand the thing he is bragging about.

Trump has been posting and ranting about the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the MoCA, as though it is the SAT, the LSAT, the bar exam, the MENSA entrance test, and the Sorting Hat all rolled into one. In his telling, passing a basic cognitive screening is proof of “extreme intelligence,” because nothing says genius like repeatedly announcing that you successfully identified a camel and drew a clock.

Now, according to Trump, he has taken this test four times. The MoCA is scored out of 30 points. Trump, in the grand tradition of casino math, appears to have decided that taking a 30-point screening four times means he “aced” 120 questions. This is not how the test works, not how cognition works, and not how math works. This is not even how bragging works, unless the goal is to build your own rake and step on it with both feet.

The MoCA is not an intelligence test. It is a screening tool used to detect possible cognitive impairment. Passing it does not mean you are a genius. It means you did not trigger enough alarms on that particular screening to warrant the next level of concern. It is the medical equivalent of “the smoke detector did not go off,” not “congratulations, you are now the fire marshal.”

Trump does not understand that. Worse, he keeps insisting on showing us that he does not understand it. He is trying to use the MoCA as evidence of his fitness, and in doing so, he is offering us a very tidy little demonstration of the problem. He is not merely saying something false. He is revealing that he cannot distinguish between a cognitive screening and an IQ test, between repetition and achievement, between a score and a personality cult.

That might be funny if he were retired and yelling at squirrels from a golf cart, but he is not. This is the man currently presiding over a widening war in the Middle East.

While Trump was online bragging about his beautiful brain trophy, Israel was expanding its invasion of Lebanon. Netanyahu says he has ordered the Israeli military to expand its maneuver there after the occupation of Beaufort Castle, calling it a “dramatic change” in the campaign. Lebanon’s prime minister has accused Israel of pursuing a scorched-earth policy. Gaza remains under deepening Israeli control and continued devastation. Iran and the United States remain stuck in negotiations that appear to be going nowhere, while Trump talks like a man who thinks diplomacy is what happens when the other side finally realizes how lucky it is to be threatened by him.

Let’s be very clear about the stakes. This is not just a story about a vain old man misunderstanding a screening test. This is about a vain old man misunderstanding a screening test while holding command authority in a moment of escalating regional war.

The same man who thinks four MoCA screenings add up to 120 questions of genius is now narrating Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Gaza, oil, nuclear weapons, and military strategy as if the Middle East were a casino table and he had just leaned over to tell the dealer, “Don’t worry, I have all the cards.”

After hiding from the press for 72 hours, Trump finally resurfaced in the safest habitat known to modern authoritarianism: a Fox interview with his daughter-in-law. Not a press conference. Not a serious sit-down with a journalist who might ask a follow-up. Not even a town hall where a voter could accidentally ask a real question. No, Trump emerged for a televised family therapy session with Lara Trump, where the questions came wrapped in bubble wrap and the interview had the emotional texture of a hostage video filmed in a Mar-a-Lago omelet station.

Asked what a good deal with Iran would look like, Trump began by saying there is “no deal that’s good enough,” then immediately said they would make a “great deal” or go back and “finish it off militarily.” He claimed this would be faster and maybe even better “from a humane standpoint,” because nothing says humanitarian diplomacy like threatening to finish off another country while sitting across from your daughter-in-law on Fox.

Then the fog machine really got going. Trump claimed the United States had defeated Iran militarily. He said 159 ships were at the bottom of the sea. He declared Iran’s navy “100% gone” and its air force “100%” gone. He talked about B-2 bombers, Iraq, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the UAE, Venezuela, drug boats, fake news, Democrats, trans people, the Second Amendment, oil production, and “Dumocrats,” a word he proudly explained as though he had just split the atom with refrigerator magnets.

He said he came up with “Dumocrats” by taking the word Democrats, removing “the b,” and switching the E with the U. I do not know what “the b” is. You do not know what “the b” is. Linguists do not know what “the b” is. Somewhere, a Scrabble tile bag just filed for asylum.

This is what we are dealing with. A man who cannot explain his own insult is explaining war.

Lara, for her part, performed the role of interviewer the way a decorative pillow performs the role of structural support. She framed his military aggression as doing “the hard things” his predecessors supposedly lacked the guts to do. Trump rewarded this by explaining that midterms create a “small window” for war, which is the sort of thing a democracy traditionally prefers its leaders not say out loud unless the democracy is already being stored in a basement freezer.

He bragged about attacking Venezuela. He said drug boats are “for the most part no longer with us.” He claimed gas prices would come tumbling down. He declared America the oil superpower. He veered into immigrants, trans children, criminals, women’s sports, the Second Amendment, fake news, and imaginary trillions pouring into the country. It was less an interview than a live demonstration of why the MoCA is not the flex he thinks it is.

Again, this would all be merely absurd if the consequences were not real. But real people are dying. Real countries are being bombed. Real diplomacy is being conducted or derailed by a man whose public statements sound like someone shook a junk drawer full of Fox News chyrons, campaign slogans, and classified briefings he half-heard during lunch.

That is the terrifying contrast today: the comedy and the catastrophe are not separate. They are braided together. The ridiculous man has real power.

Which brings us to Freedom 250, because apparently America’s 250th birthday is being planned by people who looked at the state of the republic and said, “What if we made this more embarrassing?”

The planned celebration on the National Mall was supposed to be the opening ceremony of the Great American State Fair, a 16-day patriotic spectacle running from late June into July, with stages, pavilions, rides, exhibits, and all the red-white-and-blue bunting a declining empire can staple to a security perimeter.

Then the performers started dropping out. Bret Michaels, Martina McBride, Young MC, Morris Day, Milli Vanilli, the Commodores; one by one, the musical acts began backing away. Bret Michaels reportedly said he thought he was joining a nonpartisan celebration honoring the military, veterans, teachers, and the country, not wandering into a campaign rally wrapped in bunting and bronzer.

So what did Trump do? The only thing Trump ever does. He made himself the headliner.

Organizers now say Trump will personally kick off the celebration, because when America’s birthday party loses the band, Grandpa Coup grabs the microphone and announces that he is the number one attraction anywhere in the world. Somewhere, the ghost of Elvis is asking if it is too late to change planets.

This is funny. It is also not just funny.

Eddie Glaude captured the deeper issue beautifully: Trump is trying to yoke the celebration of the country to himself, to make the nation’s 250th anniversary indistinguishable from his own ego. If performers do not want to attend his birthday pageant, then in MAGA logic, they are not just skipping Trump’s party. They are betraying America.

That is the move. That is always the move.

Trump does not want to participate in the national story. He wants to replace it. He wants America’s founding, its memory, its symbols, its monuments, its flag, its military, its birthday, and its future all collapsed into one endless Trump-branded loyalty test. The country becomes the backdrop. The people become the audience. The Constitution becomes a prop. The National Mall becomes a stage set. The public celebration becomes a campaign rally with better fireworks and worse music.

As Glaude pointed out, milestone anniversaries in this country have always arrived during moments of contradiction. The centennial came as Reconstruction was collapsing and white supremacist violence was reclaiming power across the South. The 150th came during the decade of the Klan and the immigration backlash of the 1920s. The bicentennial came in the shadow of Watergate, Vietnam, and the struggle over civil rights and Black Power. America loves to throw itself a birthday party precisely when the cracks in the foundation are impossible to ignore.

Now here we are, approaching 250, and the contradiction is once again screaming through the walls. A country that calls itself a beacon of freedom is watching its government criminalize dissent, scapegoat minorities, attack voting rights, militarize the border, and turn public memory into a cult ritual for a man who cannot emotionally survive a singer canceling on him.

As the segment put it, with a clarity future historians will appreciate: it was exactly this dumb.

That is dumb, with a b.

But dumb does not mean harmless. Dumb can still build detention camps. Dumb can still bomb countries. Dumb can still purge agencies, corrupt courts, rig maps, and turn the White House lawn into an authoritarian petting zoo. Dumb can still have lawyers, police powers, billionaire money, and nuclear codes.

And that brings us to Ashley St. Clair, a former right-wing influencer and the mother of one of Elon Musk’s many children, who has been talking openly about MAGA as a cult. Her word. She is, to be clear, an interested witness; she has active litigation against Musk’s XAI, a custody fight, and her own reasons to want the movement discredited. None of that makes her wrong. It does mean the parts worth keeping are the ones that don’t require taking her on faith.

The most durable thing she describes is capture, not persuasion. She entered young, through Turning Point and campus conservatism, 18, insecure, suddenly told by powerful older men that she was doing great work. Then the validation became the cage. Don’t trust college, don’t trust professors, don’t trust the mainstream press, don’t read what outsiders read. Her income, her friends, her identity, all fused to the movement. Leaving, she says, wasn’t changing an opinion; it was blowing up her whole life. And after years of saying vile things in public, you can’t just go apply at Starbucks. That insight doesn’t depend on trusting her, because it explains something visible: why so few leave, and why the ones who do arrive sounding like deprogrammed hostages.

She also claims the online message machine is coordinated, influencer chats where big accounts, administration figures, consulting shops, and Trump family members sync talking points in real time, some paid, some routed through consulting houses that hide the money. Treat that as her allegation; the screenshots are hers and the rest is uncorroborated. But here is the part that needs no insider at all: under current law, none of it has to be disclosed. If someone pays an influencer six figures to post a line, there is no requirement that anyone be told. The laundering she describes would be legal and invisible by design.

You don’t need her chats to confirm the effect, either. I have watched it locally for years, a former radio host turned podcaster whose on air outrage you could predict by glancing at what was trending on Twitter that morning. He wasn’t getting a memo. He didn’t need one. That’s the machine’s real efficiency: it seeds the line at the top, the algorithm launders it into “trending,” and the unpaid believers downstream rebroadcast it for free, experiencing the marching orders as their own opinions. Trump performs the delusion, Fox launders it, the influencers synchronize it, the base receives it as reality. That is the pipeline.

And that brings us back to where we started. The MoCA brag is not a side story; it is the smallest version of the whole one. A man who confuses a screening test with genius, four repetitions with achievement, domination with diplomacy, a military crisis with a ratings opportunity, and America’s birthday with his own. The movement mirrors him point for point. The country becomes the backdrop, the people the audience, the Constitution a prop.

So yes, laugh at the MoCA brag, at “Dumocrats,” at Freedom 250 losing the band and replacing it with Trump’s Traveling Narcissistic Injury Review. The absurdity is real, and sometimes laughter is the only humane response to a ruling class this stupid. But do not mistake stupid for weak. Stupid still builds detention camps and still bombs countries. Stupid still has lawyers, police powers, billionaire money, and nuclear codes.

This is the test now. Not Trump’s. Ours. Whether a country can recognize that a man bragging about a cognitive screening is actually warning us about himself. Whether it can still tell patriotism from personality cult, public memory from propaganda.

America’s 250th birthday is coming, and Trump wants to make it about him. The rest of us still have time to make it about whether the country survives men like him.



--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.


Friday, May 29, 2026

Something to Know - 29 May

The adventures of Donald Trump over the past many years have been "interesting".   I think we are coming to the end of the trail, and my opinion is that we are now looking at the whole trail in its entirety from each individual episode of lying, cheating, and corrupt practice to the final act of his presidency.   Right now he has painted himself into a corner with Iran.   His only recourse is to come up with something that will be seen as a complete waste.  Between 25-29 Billion dollars wasted on a war that should not have been started.   The nation's reputation has been shot, and everyday Americans are now victims of a suffering economy that will continue to struggle for a long time.   The distrust of government, the moral failure, and the destruction of Democracy is now the norm.   He will go down in history as a Big Loser, the Biggest of the Biggly.   His deal with Iran will forever be compared to what Obama had before Trump went off the rails;  Obama had a better deal.   Trump will know that he is a failure.   It's fitting that in our 250th year, we realize how bad things can get when you disregard your obligation to participate in the democratic process.

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

May 28, 2026, 10:44 PM (12 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

It’s an excellent bet that future books and films made about the Trump Era will begin with an image of the White House this week. The world-famous Rose Garden has been replaced with a patio that looks like one at Mar-a-Lago. The East Wing is rubble. And on the sweeping South Lawn, right outside the front door of the White House, construction is underway on a massive Ultimate Fighting Championship arena for cage matches to be held on Trump’s 80th birthday.

Now treating the nation’s capital as his property, Trump appears to be leaning on his past role as a real estate developer as a solution in Iran remains elusive, inflation in the U.S. climbs, and his popularity drops.

In addition to turning back to real estate, Trump seems to be lashing out to reassert his dominance over those who have hurt him.

Last night, Hannah Rabinowitz, Paula Reid, and Kara Scannell of CNN reported that the Department of Justice under President Donald J. Trump has launched a criminal investigation into whether 82-year-old E. Jean Carroll, the journalist who successfully sued Trump for defamation and for sexual assault, committed perjury in her testimony by saying she was not being paid to launch the lawsuit when it turned out later that billionaire Reid Hoffman had paid some of her legal fees and expenses.

Trump also refiled his $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over its publication of an article describing a card for sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s fiftieth birthday. The card shows a crude sketch of a girl, bearing words that refer to “certain things in common” and saying, “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday—and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

Trump’s lawsuit says that the article damaged his reputation and that the card is fake, although it came from Epstein’s estate. The estate later provided a copy of the card to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which published it on its own website.

U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles tossed out the original lawsuit last month, saying that Trump came “nowhere close” to establishing that the article’s authors acted with “actual malice” to defame him, but said Trump could amend the lawsuit and refile it. Yesterday, he did.

On Tuesday, Alan Feuer of the New York Times noted that Trump’s politicization of the Department of Justice means grand juries as well as judges appear to be losing faith in the department. Although it is a common saying that prosecutors can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, government prosecutors have had trouble getting the indictments Trump wants against his perceived political enemies.

In part this is because Trump has replaced career prosecutors with inexperienced loyalists, as Feuer notes, but it is also because of trumped-up charges against people like former FBI director James Comey and the six Democratic lawmakers who released a public video reminding military and intelligence personnel that they must not obey illegal orders.

Federal judges have been accusing prosecutors of misconduct, most recently in a case last week in Chicago in which a grand jury indicted six people, including a Democratic congressional candidate, for interfering with a federal agent and conspiring to interfere with a federal agent at a protest at a detention facility.

As Julie Bosman of the New York Times reported, U.S. District Judge April Perry dismissed the case after she discovered that prosecutors had talked to individual grand jurors outside the courtroom and removed those jurors who refused to indict, as well as apparently overstating the strength of the evidence against the defendants. After making these maneuvers, the prosecutors then tried to hide evidence of them by redacting the transcripts from the grand jury.

Judge Perry said: “I have read hundreds, if not thousands, of grand jury transcripts involving prosecutors who are the most junior of prosecutors to several U.S. attorneys who appeared before the grand jury. I have never seen the types of prosecutorial behavior before a grand jury that I saw in those transcripts.”

If Trump can end the rule of law, he can do as he wishes.

At least some of what he appears to want is corrupt dealings that put money into the pockets of himself and his family members. Today Robert Faturechi of ProPublica reported that Trump’s trade advisor Peter Navarro personally pressured the Pentagon to loan $620 million to Vulcan Elements, a small North Carolina startup company in which Donald Trump Jr. has a financial stake.

Navarro and Don Jr. appear to be close, and a Pentagon official told Faturechi that “[t]he call came from the White House: We have to get this done.”

According to Faturechi, the Pentagon invested $620 million in Vulcan, a rare-earth magnet company, and another $80 million in its partner ReElement. The Commerce Department provided another $50 million in incentives, and the government took a $50 million stake in Vulcan.

When Trump Jr.’s venture capital firm 1789 Capital invested in Vulcan in August 2025, the company was worth about $200 million. After the government investments, that valuation jumped to around $2 billion. Bloomberg reported last week that the investment in ReElement might not go through because of concerns over its ability to scale up its technology.

A spokesperson for the Pentagon told Faturechi that the Vulcan deal was sped up as defense officials balance “lightning speed with rigorous diligence to close high-impact deals that directly strengthen America’s defense and empower our warfighters.”

And yet, despite their evident attempt to warp the U.S. legal system to their own purposes, Trump and his MAGA loyalists insist that they are the ones against whom the Department of Justice has been used. That is their justification for the $1.776 billion slush fund for paying off those who were convicted of crimes for their participation in Trump’s schemes to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Last night, a group of thirty-five former federal judges took on that slush fund.

As Maegan Vazquez of the Washington Post reported, the former judges, appointed by members of both political parties, asked U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams to reopen the legal case Trump, his oldest sons, and the Trump Organization brought against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for a “judicial review of the extraordinary—and historically unprecedented—circumstances presented by this litigation and by the collusive ‘settlement’ that invokes this litigation as the legal justification for its terms.”

Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization dropped the lawsuit after Williams appeared to question whether it was actually a legitimate lawsuit, since Trump was both the plaintiff and the person in charge of the IRS, then announced they had reached a “settlement agreement” with the Department of Justice. Williams was clear in her order closing the case that there was “no settlement of record” in it.

The judges expressed concern that the Trumps were manipulating the judicial system, “which threatens to undermine confidence in the administration of justice.” They suggested that “this ‘case’ that the parties purport to have ‘settled’ is itself a fraud on the Court.” They also maintain that “this ‘settlement’ is a product of collusion and is itself a fraud on the Court,” and that “[f]raud on the court is established by clear and convincing evidence.”

“The parties have used this lawsuit—which was never an adversarial proceeding over which the Court even had jurisdiction—as a means to allow a ‘commission’ controlled by the President to dole out $1.776 billion in taxpayer dollars without constitutional or congressional authority to do so, and to confer unlawful private benefits to the President and his family by purportedly prohibiting the United States from prosecuting any and all claims against them.”

“To be clear,” the judges wrote, “the parties’ settlement was not, and never will be, legally justified.”



--
****
Juan Matute
R.B.R.
C.C.R.C.