Saturday, June 17, 2023

Something to Know - 17 June

We live in the wake of the tides of information (news) just as the oceans crash on the sandy beaches and rock barriers.   Low tides are eras of no information, and the high tides bring in the fresh sprays of knowledge from the depths of the seas.  Such is the case as we remember Daniel Ellsberg, who recently passed on at the age  of 92, and how he was able to expose the dirty secrets of our nation's leaders as we drifted into the Vietnam War.   We remember Ellsberg for his actions in obtaining and revealing actions by his government that were deceitful and designed to cover up what the American people had a right to know.   Exposure of top secret and classified material is severely guarded by many federal agencies, and is considered to be treasonous enough to warrant a lock up for life in prison.  Trying to compare Ellsberg to Trump?  No, that does not work one bit.  Ellsberg was determined to see that the American people were being deprived of knowledge that they had every right to know.  Trump, why did he remove and keep, and fail to turn back documents that rightly belonged in the National Archives.   We know what he did; there are 37 separate charges.   But, do we know why?  Ask him directly in front of a jury as to the WHY of his purported crimes?  I think it is because of all of his past career moves as a being a thug, failing to pay for services rendered, and the altogether art of bullying his way out of accountability.  He was perhaps keeping them as a trophy, or trying to find something that proved his machismo in being a president, or he may have had a plan to  monetize information for his own personal use.   He does have a reputation of being the Supreme Grifter.

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American Unsubscribe

Jun 16, 2023, 8:26 PM (12 hours ago)
to me
Open in app or online

In one of the quirky coincidences that history deals out, Daniel Ellsberg died today at age 92 on the eve of the fifty-first anniversary of the break-in at the offices of the Democratic National Committee in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, D.C.

Ellsberg was a military analyst in the 1960s, disturbed by the gulf between what the government was telling the public about the war in Vietnam and what he was seeing behind the scenes.

After serving as a Marine, Ellsberg earned his doctorate at Harvard and joined the RAND Corporation, where he learned to apply game theory to warfare. By 1964 he was an advisor to Robert McNamara, who served as defense secretary under presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson. In 1967, Ellsberg was part of the team tapped by McNamara to compile a history of the conflict in Vietnam to evaluate the success of different programs.

Ellsberg was concerned by investigators' conclusions. The 7,000-page secret government study detailed U.S. involvement in Vietnam from Harry Truman's presidency to Lyndon Johnson's. It outlined how successive presidents had lied to the American people, expanding the war with promises of victory even as the costs of the war mounted and the chances of victory moved farther and farther away.

Ellsberg copied the secret study and shared it with congressmen, who buried it. Finally, Ellsberg shared the report with a New York Times correspondent on the condition the reporter would only take notes and would not copy the pages. But the correspondent broke the agreement, believing the documents were "the property of the people" who had paid for them with "the blood of their sons."

On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began to publish what became known as the Pentagon Papers, showing how presidents had lied to the American people about the nation's involvement in Vietnam. President Richard Nixon's attorney general, John Mitchell, warned the New York Times that the publication was jeopardizing national security and warned that the government would prosecute. The editors decided to continue publication—the Supreme Court later agreed that the newspaper had the right to publish the information—while Ellsberg leaked the report to other newspapers.

The study ended before the Nixon administration, but the president was deeply concerned about it. The report showed that presidents had lied to the American people for years, and Nixon worried that the story would hurt his administration by souring the public on his approach to the Vietnam War. Worse, if anyone looked at his own administration, they might well find evidence of his own secret actions in the Vietnam arena: the Chennault affair, in which a Nixon ally undermined peace talks before the 1968 presidential election in order to undercut Johnson's reelection campaign, and what was then the undisclosed bombing of Cambodia.

News of either could, at the very least, destroy Nixon's reelection campaign.

Nixon became obsessed with the idea that the Pentagon Papers proved that opponents were trying to sink his campaign for reelection.

Frustrated when the FBI did not seem to be taking an investigation into Ellsberg seriously enough, in July 1971, Nixon put together in the White House a special investigations unit to stop leaks. And who stops leaks?


Officially known as the White House Special Investigations Unit, Nixon's "plumbers" burglarized the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist on September 9, 1971, hoping to find damaging information about him that would discredit the Pentagon Papers. (Their burglary, showing gross governmental misconduct, was later key to the dismissal of charges against Ellsberg for leaking the report.)

Some of the plumbers began to work with the Committee to Reelect the President (aptly called "CREEP" as its methods came to light) to sabotage Nixon's Democratic opponents by "ratf*cking" them, as they called it, planting fake letters in newspapers, hiring vendors for Democratic rallies and then running out on the unpaid bills, and planting spies in Democrats' campaigns.

Finally, CREEP turned back to the plumbers.

Early in the morning on June 17, 1972, Frank Wills, a 24-year-old security guard at the Watergate Office Building in Washington, D.C., noticed that a door lock had been taped open. He ripped off the tape and closed the door, but on his next round he found the door taped open again. He called the police, who found five burglars in the Democratic National Committee headquarters located in the building.

The White House denied all knowledge of what it called a "third-rate burglary attempt," and most of the press took the denial at face value. But two young reporters for the Washington Post, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, followed the sloppy money trail behind the burglars directly to the White House.

The fallout from the burglary gained no traction before the election, which Nixon and Vice President Spiro Agnew won with an astonishing 60.7 percent of the vote. But the scandal erupted in March 1973, when one of the burglars, James W. McCord, Jr., wrote a letter to Judge John Sirica before his sentencing, saying that he had lied at his trial, under pressure to protect government officials. McCord had been the head of security for CREEP, and Sirica, known by reporters as "Maximum John," later said, "I had no intention of sitting on the bench like a nincompoop and watching the parade go by."

Sirica made the letter public, White House counsel John Dean promptly began cooperating with prosecutors, and the Watergate scandal was in full swing. On August 9, 1974, Nixon became the first president in American history to resign.

Ellsberg decided to release the Pentagon Papers to alert the American people to the fact that their government was lying to them about the Vietnam War. But he helped set in motion a series of events that determined the shape of the political world we live in today.



Q. What is the difference between a law-abiding gun owner and a criminal?

A.  The .2 of a second that it takes to pull a trigger.

No comments:

Post a Comment