Good Day! Looks like Southern California is going to warm up to some nice weather. Growing conditions for plants, trees, and other stuff is ideal. So much for the good stuff, now for the bad stuff; this story

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/25000-barrels-ddt-dump-site-pacific-scientists-say-rcna769

just disgusts me. It involves the chemical DDT. Growing up in the Torrance/Redondo Beach area of Los Angeles county, I remember a big chemical plant (I think it was called Union Carbide) just east of Hawthorne Blvd around Prairie avenue. Over the years, it changed hands, and this valuable real estate became part of the big Del Amo shopping area, and more to the north for the Old Towne shopping area. However there was one piece of land that never was developed, and stayed barren, and is still undeveloped. Turns out that this was a prime area for a remaining chemical plant that produced DDT. DDT was banned from production and use some time later, and there was a huge cache of the chemical that had to be eliminated. This is where it gets sad. Right now, the story is that 25,000 barrels (maybe more) was dumped into the deep channel between the Palos Verdes/San Pedro peninsula and Catalina Island. I would like to know how the decision was made to dump it all there, who is responsible, and how does this get rectified. Of course, all the various companies who made the stuff and dumped it are all out of business, and it will now be the tax payers financial problem. The marine animals and consumers of the fish are all subject to the ravages of DDT, and all the problems for which the chemical was banned. It all goes to prove that we are our own worst enemy - chemical poisoning, superfund cleanups, climate change, and stupid politicians - all bad. So maybe HCR is your pick-me-up for this morning's read:

April 27, 2021 (Tuesday)

Heather Cox Richardson

Apr 28

More than 140 military leaders, former national security officials, and elected officials from both parties have asked Congress to establish a commission to figure out what led to the January 6 insurrection, when rioters attacked the U.S. Capitol, and how to stop a similar coup attempt in the future.

Yesterday, Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY) told reporters that the proposed congressional commission should focus solely on that attack. "What happened on January 6 is unprecedented in our history, and I think that it's very important that the commission be able to focus on that," she said. "It's very important that the January 6 commission focus on what happened on January 6 and what led to that day."

Cheney is staking out turf apart from that of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who has said any commission should cover political violence in general, including Black Lives Matter protesters and Antifa protests. And yet, an investigation by The Guardian established that more than 90% of arrests at Black Lives Matter protests never led to charges and were apparently at least in part to feed a narrative that the BLM protesters were violent.

Cheney and McCarthy are parting ways over what they see the future of the Republican Party to be. Cheney voted to convict former president Trump of incitement of insurrection for the events of January 6 and clearly wants to keep herself from the contamination of that crisis.

McCarthy, in contrast, has come back to the Trump fold. Immediately after the January 6 attack, a number of Republicans who had witnessed the events said that McCarthy called Trump to beg him to call off the insurrectionists. Trump had said to him, "Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are," to which McCarthy responded: "Who the F—k do you think you're talking to?"

Nonetheless, later that night, McCarthy joined the majority of the House Republicans to object to the counting of the certified state ballots electing Joe Biden president. Although he later said that the former president "bears responsibility" for the assault, he voted against his impeachment for incitement of insurrection.

What is at stake is the future of the Republican Party. What is also at stake is the future of the country.

McCarthy doesn't want to alienate Trump or his supporters because he sees them as key to future electoral victories. On Fox News Sunday this week, Chris Wallace asked McCarthy whether the story about his angry phone call with Trump on January 6 was true, but, despite witnesses, McCarthy refused to answer. He would like to keep Trump voters behind Republican candidates and has suggested forcing Cheney out of her leadership position in the party.

The Trump loyalists in the party are trying to take over the party in its entirety. Trump and his supporters have continued to feed the idea that Biden cheated Trump out of his election win until now more than two thirds of Republicans say they believe Biden did not win the election. (He did. This is well established.)

To continue to feed this Big Lie, Republicans in the Arizona state senate have turned to a private company for a vote audit in Arizona's largest county, Maricopa. The vote has already been audited at least twice, under formal rules, and both audits turned up no fraud. Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell, a Republican, said there was no need to review the ballots again.

In contrast to the trained election officials, the company the Republicans tapped is run by a conspiracy theorist who supports the idea that voter fraud stole the election from Trump; he claims Trump actually won by 200,000 votes. When a judge ordered the company, Cyber Ninjas, to explain publicly how it was conducting the audit, company attorneys refused. A reporter who observed the early process by claiming to be a volunteer noted that the volunteers helping with the audit were using pens that could be picked up by the scanners. The ballots are no longer secure, so whatever this so-called audit claims is automatically suspect.

Tying the Republican Party to the Big Lie that caused the January 6 insurrection is a dangerous game. It is still unclear what will come out about the insurrection and the media lies that supported it and continue to support it.

While officials in the Department of Justice have been quiet about investigations of the insurrection, that does not mean they are ignoring it: it is not appropriate to comment on an ongoing investigation. Indeed, more than four hundred people have already been arrested for their participation in the insurrection, and news broke yesterday that the FBI had at least four informants within the Proud Boys, the right-wing organization that allegedly provided security for Trump adviser Roger Stone in the days around the insurrection. The Department of Justice has announced it expects to charge at least 100 more individuals.

There are also suggestive insurrection-adjacent stories swirling. A far-right British agitator, Tommy Robinson, who urged Trump supporters to keep fighting after the insurrection and who appeared in right-wing U.S. media, is now affiliating himself with Russia.

If Russian disinformation is indeed involved in the Big Lie, it might well be revealed: nine regional military commanders last year asked the intelligence community to declassify information about the ways in which Russia and China are undermining U.S. national security by shaping public opinion. Yesterday, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines announced that the administration will establish a new center to coordinate intelligence about foreign interference in U.S. politics. Haines noted that "[E]fforts by U.S. adversaries seek to exacerbate divisions and undermine confidence in our democratic institutions."

Lawyers from the Justice Department have been arguing in court lately that Trump's continued lying about the election, along with the amplification of those lies by right-wing media, remains an ongoing threat.

—-

Notes: