Friday, May 9, 2025

Something to Know - 9 May

Every media outlet is covering the story of the new Pope.   HCR is no exception.   I think we probably all know the background history in some fashion of Pope Leo XIV.   With the placement of a Pope who is similar in social issues and concern for individuals who are often overlooked by the rich and powerful, and now someone who is going to follow a similar path, this puts a strain on MAGA.   Some details of the Trumpism and MAGA dissention are covered in HCR's narrative today.   I can only wonder if Trump is going to rise to the imbecile position of requesting to have the Catholic Church's tax exemption status removed, unless the Church makes a deal.   Remember, anything is possible with this guy.

Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

May 8, 2025, 10:28 PM (9 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Today, on the second day of the papal conclave, the cardinal electors—133 members of the College of Cardinals who were under the age of 80 when Pope Francis died on April 21—elected a new pope. They chose 69-year-old Cardinal Robert Prevost, who was born in Chicago, thus making him the first pope chosen from the United States. But he spent much of his ministry in Peru and became a citizen of Peru in 2015, making him the first pope from Peru, as well.

New popes choose a papal name to signify the direction of their papacy, and Prevost has chosen to be known as Pope Leo XIV. This is an important nod to Pope Leo XIII, who led the church from 1878 to 1903 and was the father of modern Catholic social teaching. He called for the church to address social and economic issues, and emphasized the dignity of individuals, the common good, community, and taking care of marginalized individuals.

In the midst of the Gilded Age, Leo XIII defended the rights of workers and said that the church had not just the duty to speak about justice and fairness, but also the responsibility to make sure that such equities were accomplished. In his famous 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, translated as "Of New Things," Leo XIII rejected both socialism and unregulated capitalism, and called for the state to protect the rights of individuals.

Prevost's choice of the name Leo invokes the principles of both Leo XIII and his predecessor, Pope Francis. In his own lifetime he has aligned himself with many of Francis's social reforms, and his election appears to be a rejection of hard-line right-wing Catholics in the U.S. and elsewhere who have used their religion to support far-right politics.

In the U.S., Vice-President J.D. Vance is one of those hard-line right-wing Catholics. Shortly after taking office in January, Vance began to talk of the concept of ordo amoris, or "order of love," articulated by Catholic St. Augustine, claiming it justified the MAGA emphasis on family and tribalism and suggesting it justified the mass expulsion of migrants.

Vance told Sean Hannity of the Fox News Channel, "[Y]ou love your family, and then you love your neighbor, and then you love your community, and then you love your fellow citizens in your own country, and then, after that, you can focus and prioritize the rest of the world. A lot of the far left has completely inverted that." When right-wing influencer Jack Posobiec, who is Catholic, posted Vance's interview approvingly, Vance added: "Just google 'ordo amoris.' Aside from that, the idea that there isn't a hierarchy of obligations violates basic common sense."

On February 10, Pope Francis responded in a letter to American bishops. He corrected Vance's assertion as a false interpretation of Catholic theology. "Christians know very well that it is only by affirming the infinite dignity of all that our own identity as persons and as communities reaches its maturity," he wrote. "Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups…. The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by…meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception."

"[W]orrying about personal, community or national identity, apart from these considerations, easily introduces an ideological criterion that distorts social life and imposes the will of the strongest as the criterion of truth," Pope Francis wrote. He acknowledged "the right of a nation to defend itself and keep communities safe from those who have committed violent or serious crimes while in the country or prior to arrival," but defended the fundamental dignity of every human being and the fundamental rights of migrants, noting that the "rightly formed conscience" would disagree with any program that "identifies the illegal status of some migrants with criminality." He continued: "I exhort all the faithful of the Catholic Church, and all men and women of good will, not to give in to narratives that discriminate against and cause unnecessary suffering to our migrant and refugee brothers and sisters."

The next day, Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, who said he was "a lifelong Catholic," told reporters at the White House, "I've got harsh words for the Pope…. He ought to fix the Catholic Church and concentrate on his work and leave border enforcement to us."

Cardinal Prevost was close to Pope Francis, and during this controversy he posted on X after Vance's assertion but before Pope Francis's answer: "JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others." After the pope published his letter, Prevost reposted it with the comment: "Pope Francis' letter, JD Vance's 'ordo amoris' and what the Gospel asks of all of us on immigration."

On April 14, Prevost reposted: "As Trump & [Salvadoran president Nayib] Bukele use Oval to [laugh at] Feds' illicit deportation of a US resident [Kilmar Abrego Garcia], once an undoc[ument]ed Salvadorean himself, [Bishop Evelio Menjivar] asks, 'Do you not see the suffering? Is your conscience not disturbed? How can you stay quiet?'"

The new Pope Leo XIV greeted the world today in Italian and Spanish as he thanked Pope Francis and the other cardinals, and called for the church to "be a missionary Church, building bridges, dialogue, always open to receiving with open arms for everyone…, open to all, to all who need our charity, our presence, dialogue, love…, especially to those who are suffering."

As an American-born pope in the model of Pope Francis, Pope Leo XIV might be able to appeal to American far-right Catholics and bring them back into the fold. But today, MAGAs responded to the new pope with fury. Right-wing influencer Laura Loomer, who is close to Trump, called Pope Leo "another Marxist puppet in the Vatican." Influencer Charlie Kirk suggested he was an "[o]pen borders globalist installed to counter Trump."

In the U.S., President Donald Trump, who said he would like to be pope and then posted a picture of himself dressed as a pope on May 2, prompting an angry backlash against those who thought it was disrespectful, posted on social media that the election of the first pope from the United States was "a Great Honor for our Country" and that he looks forward to meeting him. 'It will be a very meaningful moment!" he added.

—


--
****
Juan Matute
The Harold Wilke House 
Claremont, California

Who is Asset Kraznov?
(we know where he is)


Posted by No comments:

Thursday, May 8, 2025

Something to Know - 8 May

Trump continues being Trump, and it gets tiresome.   However, his buddy Musk is running wild in a venue that most people do not understand.   His capture of the data banks in the government, coupled with his grand delusion of settling Mars is sucking the lifeblood out of whatever is left to support just the daily lives of we common folk.    


Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

May 7, 2025, 11:06 PM (9 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Alarm appears to be rising about how the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) is consolidating data about Americans. Hannah Natanson, Joseph Menn, Lisa Rein, and Rachel Siegel wrote in the Washington Post today that DOGE is "racing to build a single centralized database with vast troves of personal information about millions of U.S. citizens and residents." In the past, that information has been carefully siloed, and there are strict laws about accessing it. But under billionaire Elon Musk, who appears to direct DOGE although the White House has said he does not, operatives who may not have appropriate security clearances are removing protections and linking data.

There are currently at least eleven lawsuits underway claiming that DOGE has violated the 1974 Privacy Act regulating who can access information about American citizens stored by the federal government.

Musk and President Donald Trump, as well as other administration officials, claim that such consolidation of data is important to combat "waste, fraud, and abuse," although so far they have not been able to confirm any such savings and their cuts are stripping ordinary Americans of programs they depend on. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the Washington Post reporters that DOGE's processes are protected by "some of the brightest cybersecurity minds in the nation" and that "every action taken is fully compliant with the law."

Cybersecurity experts outside the administration disagree that a master database is secure or safe, as DOGE is bypassing normal safeguards, including neglecting to record who has accessed or changed database information. The Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard's Kennedy School explains that data can be altered or manipulated to redirect funds, for example, and that there is substantial risk that data can be hacked or leaked. It can be used to commit fraud or retaliate against individuals.

The Ash Center also explains that U.S. government data is an extraordinarily valuable treasure trove for anyone trying to train artificial intelligence systems. Most of the data currently available is from the internet and is thus messy and unreliable. Government databases are "comprehensive, verified records about the most critical areas of Americans' lives." Access to that data gives a company "significant advantages" in training systems and setting business strategies. Americans have not given consent for their data to be used in this way, and it leaves them open to "loss of services, harassment, discrimination, or manipulation by the government, private entities, or foreign powers."

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo suggests Musk's faith in his AI company is at least part of what's behind the administration's devastating cuts to biomedical research. Those who believe in a future centered around AI believe that it will be far more effective than human research scientists, so cutting actual research is efficient. At the same time, Marshall suggests, tech oligarchs find the years-long timelines of actual research and the demands of scientists on peer reviews and careful study frustrating, as they want to put their ideas into practice quickly.

If the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is an example of what it looks like when a tech oligarch tries to run a government agency, it's a cautionary tale. Under Trump the FAA has become entangled with Musk's SpaceX space technology company and its subsidiary Starlink satellite company, and it appears that the American people are being used to make Musk's dream come true.

Musk believes that humans must colonize Mars in order to become a multiplanetary species as insurance against the end of life on Earth. On Monday he explained to Jesse Watters of the Fox News Channel that eventually the Earth will be incinerated by an expanding sun, so humans must move to other planets to survive. In 2016, Musk predicted that humans would start landing on Mars in 2025, but in the Watters interview he revised his prediction to possibly 2029 but more likely 2031.

Critics note that while it is true the sun is expanding, the change is not expected to affect the Earth for another 5 billion years. As a frame of reference, humans evolved from their predecessors about 300,000 years ago.

But getting to Mars requires lots of leeway to experiment, and Musk turned against the head of the FAA under President Joe Biden, Mike Whitaker, after Whitaker called for Musk's SpaceX company to be fined $633,009 over safety and environmental violations. Musk complained that the FAA's environmental and safety requirements were "unreasonable and exasperating" and that they "undercut American industry's ability to innovate." Musk continued: "The fundamental problem is that humanity will forever be confined to Earth unless there is radical reform at the FAA!"

Musk endorsed an employee's complaint on social media that Whitaker required SpaceX "to consult on minor paperwork updates relating to previously approved non-safety issues that have already been determined to have zero environmental impact," reposting it with the comment: "He needs to resign." Musk spent almost $300 million to get Trump elected, and Whitaker resigned the day Trump took office.

That same day, the administration froze the hiring of all federal employees, including air traffic controllers, although the U.S. Department of Transportation warned in June 2023 that 77% of air traffic control facilities critical to daily operations of the airline industry were short staffed. The next day, January 21, Trump fired Transportation Security Administration (TSA) chief David Pekoske, and administration officials removed all the members of the Aviation Security Advisory Committee, which Congress created after the 1988 PanAm 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland. The Trump administration vacated the positions with an eye to "eliminating the misuse of resources."

Today Lori Aratani of the Washington Post reported that in February, shortly after the deadly collision of an American Airlines jet and a U.S. Army helicopter in the airspace over Washington, D.C., administration officials also stopped the work of an outside panel of experts examining the country's air traffic control system.

After President Trump blamed the crash on diversity, equity, and inclusion hiring practices, career officials quit in disgust, according to Isaac Stanley-Becker of The Atlantic. As they left, an engineer from Musk's SpaceX satellite company arrived. He had instructions from Musk to insert equipment from Starlink, a subsidiary of SpaceX, into the FAA's communications network. On the social media platform X, Musk warned that the existing communications system for the FAA "is breaking down very rapidly" and was "putting air traveler safety at risk." In fact, the government had awarded a 15-year, $2.4 billion contract to Verizon in 2023 to make the necessary upgrades.

Starlink ties into Musk's plans for Mars. In November 2024, SpaceX pitched NASA on creating Marslink, a version of Starlink that would link to Mars, and Starlink's current terms of service specify that disputes over service on or around the planet Earth or the Moon will be governed by the laws of Texas but that "[f]or Services provided on Mars, or in transit to Mars via Starship or other spacecraft, the parties recognize Mars as a free planet and that no Earth-based government has authority or sovereignty over Martian activities. Accordingly, Disputes will be settled through self-governing principles, established in good faith, at the time of Martian settlement."

In early March, debris from the explosion of one of Musk's SpaceX starships disrupted 240 flights. On April 28, air traffic controllers lost both radio and radar contact with the pilots who were flying planes into Newark, New Jersey, Liberty International Airport, for about 90 seconds. In the aftermath of the incident, aircraft traffic in and out of Newark was halted, and four experienced controllers and one trainee took medical leave for trauma.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, a former Fox Business host, suggested the Biden administration was to blame for the decaying system. His predecessor as transportation secretary, Pete Buttigieg, dismissed the accusation as "just politics," noting that he had launched the modernization of the systems and reversed decades of declining numbers of air traffic controllers.

On Monday the White House fired Alvin Brown, the Black vice chair of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the agency that investigates civilian aviation accidents. Former FAA and NTSB investigator Jeff Guzzetti told Christopher Wiggins of The Advocate: "This is the first time in modern history that the White House has removed a board member."

Musk has the power of the United States government behind him. In December, Trump nominated Musk associate and billionaire Jared Isaacman to become the next head of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Senate has not yet confirmed Isaacman, but the Republican-dominated Senate Commerce Committee advanced his nomination last week. The president's proposed budget, released Friday, calls for cutting about 25% of NASA's funding—about $6 billion—and giving $1 billion of the money remaining to initiatives focused on Mars.

Yesterday the FAA granted permission for SpaceX to increase the number of rocket launches it attempts from Boca Chica, Texas, from 5 to 25 per year after concluding that additional launches would have "no significant impact" on the environment near the launchpad. The first test of a SpaceX rocket launch there in 2023 caused the launchpad to explode, and the spaceship itself blew up, sending chunks of concrete into the nesting and migration site of an endangered species and starting a 3.5-acre fire. In their hurry to rebuild, SpaceX officials ignored permitting processes. According to Texas and the Environmental Protection Agency, the company then violated environmental regulations by releasing pollutants into bodies of water.

Musk is trying to make Starlink dominate the Earth's communications, a dominance that would give him enormous power, as he suggested last month when he noted that Ukraine's "entire front line would collapse if I turned it off." In April, Trump delayed the rural broadband program in what appeared to be an attempt to shift the program toward Starlink, and today Tom Perkins of The Guardian reported that the administration is going to end federal research into space pollution, which is building up alarmingly in the stratosphere owing in part to Musk's satellites.

Today Jeff Stein and Hannah Natanson of the Washington Post reported that the administration has been telling nations that want to talk about trade that it will consider "licensing Starlink" as a demonstration of "goodwill and intent to welcome U.S. businesses." India, among other nations, has rushed through approvals of the satellite company. Just 1% of India's consumer broadband market could produce almost $1 billion a year, the authors report.

In a statement, the State Department told Stein and Natanson: "Starlink is an American-made product that has been game-changing in helping remote areas around the world gain internet connectivity. Any patriotic American should want to see an American company's success on the global stage, especially over compromised Chinese competitors."

The attempt to gain control over artificial intelligence and human communication networks regardless of the cost to ordinary Americans might have a larger theme. As technology forecaster Paul Saffo points out, tech oligarchs led by technology guru Curtis Yarvin have called for a new world order that rejects the nation states around which humans have organized their societies for almost 400 years. They call instead for "network states" organized around technology that permits individuals to group around a leader in cyberspace without reference to real-world boundaries, a position Starlink's terms of service appear to reflect.

Mastering artificial intelligence while dominating global communications would go a long way toward breaking down existing nations and setting up the conditions for a brave new world, dominated by tech oligarchs.

—


--
****
Juan Matute
The Harold Wilke House 
Claremont, California

Who is Asset Kraznov?
(we know where he is)


Posted by No comments:

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Something to Know - 6 May

Trump has decided that he going to continue to defy the protections afforded by our Constitution in so many ways.   He detests the print and TV programming that tell the truth, and he leans on media corporate heads to get what he wants.   Take the CBS program "60 Minutes" and a former producer who quit to protest Trump's pressure on the CBS corporation to tailor its programming to suit the authoritarian bozo.   Bill Owens is that producer, and someone has written an account on how it all went down.

Author: Bruce Lindner on FB


If you missed last night's 60 Minutes segment on the Trump administration's war on truth, here's the link. But I think a little back story is called for, for those who haven't been following the story.


It was just a few weeks ago that 60 Minutes producer Bill Owens resigned from the program. The reason he quit, was because CBS's parent company, Paramount Global, is in the process of an $8 billion merger with Skydance Media, but in order to consummate that deal, they need the approval of the FCC, currently under the aegis of the Trump administration.


So the president of CBS News, Wendy McMahon, doesn't want to rock the boat. So her office (according to Owens) put pressure on him to go easy on any exposés on the Trump administration, lest it sink Paramount's Skydance deal.


Pretty simple: We have to cave, just like all those high-profile legal firms did, in order to conduct business as usual. Profits first, integrity can suck it.


Except that was a bridge too far for Bill Owens, so he resigned. And on the following week's 60 Minutes broadcast, Scott Pelley told the back story to the world, citing "interference from above" and ending his announcement with; "None of us are happy about it."


That took guts.


Fast forward to today. Paramount Global's pressure campaign has utterly failed, at least for now. Say what you want about 60 Minutes, but they're clearly not playing upper management's game. This follow-up story was a thumb in Wendy McMahon's eye. Or possibly a collective middle finger from the entire 60 Minutes team.


We're on the knife's edge of losing our Democracy folks, and if the Fourth Estate crumbles, that'll be the death of TRUTH. If Trump ever gives an illegal order to the military (such as invading a fellow NATO country's sovereign territory) and the Joint Chiefs carry it out without question, in my opinion, that's when we can close the book. That would be end game for the U. S. of A.


I've seen several posts from friends over the past few weeks about boycotting 60 Minutes or CBS over this story. I would implore you to reconsider, especially after last night's story. They are CLEARLY not giving in to McMahon's (and Trump's) pressure. They deserve our respect for how they've stood up to power.


It's a hell of a thing to accuse your bosses of corruption (ask me how I know). In the case of 60 Minutes, Wendy McMahon and Paramount Global have ALL the power. They can make or break someone's career with the stroke of a pen. All the writers, producers, investigators and journalists have, is their integrity and a desire to report the unvarnished truth. At the moment, the latter group just scored a goal. But that doesn't mean the people "upstairs" won't retaliate in some fashion.


In my own case, when I went to war with my employer back in the '80s over their corruption, it consumed six years of my life. And I can admit it now, I suffered from several years of PTSD as a result—at a time when my toddler daughter needed a full-time dad the most. So taking on corruption is a BFD. But the consequences of NOT calling it out wherever it lurks is untenable. And on the international stage, potentially catastrophic.


So in the end, 60 Minutes **HAS** to win this war for truth, political pressure notwithstanding. Failure isn't an option. If they fail, America fails. That's not hyperbole.


What's the worst that can happen if one man who insists on getting his way by intimidating the media isn't put in check? Ask the people of early 20th century Germany how that worked out for them.


--
****
Juan Matute
The Harold Wilke House 
Claremont, California

Who is Asset Kraznov?
(we know where he is)


Posted by No comments:

Monday, May 5, 2025

Something to Know - 5 May

And the beat goes on.   More failure to support and defend the Constitution and doubling down with Defiance:


Heather Cox Richardson from Letters from an American heathercoxrichardson@substack.com 
Unsubscribe

May 4, 2025, 9:18 PM (13 hours ago)
to me
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

In an interview aired today on NBC News's Meet the Press, reporter Kristen Welker asked President Donald J. Trump if he agreed that every person in the United States is entitled to due process.

"I don't know. I'm not, I'm not a lawyer. I don't know," Trump answered.

The U.S. Constitution guarantees that "no person shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Judges across the political spectrum agree that the amendment does not limit due process to citizens. In his decision in the 1993 case Reno v. Flores, conservative icon Justice Antonin Scalia wrote: "it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in deportation proceedings."

In his oath of office, Trump vowed to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

When Welker pointed out that the Constitution guarantees due process, Trump suggested he could ignore it because honoring due process was too slow. "I don't know," he said. "It seems—it might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," he said. "We have thousands of people that are—some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth."

"I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it," he added.

Welker tried again. "[D]on't you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States?"

Trump replied: "I don't know. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said."

Conservative judge J. Michael Luttig explained to MSNBC's Ari Velshi that far-right scholars have argued that the president does not have to follow the Supreme Court if he doesn't agree with its decisons: he can interpret the Constitution for himself. Luttig called this "constitutional denialism." He added that "[t]he American people deserve to know if the President does not intend to uphold the Constitution of the United States or if he intends to uphold it only when he agrees with the Supreme Court."

Mark Berman and Jeremy Roebuck of the Washington Post reported today that federal judges are becoming increasingly impatient with the incompetence of the Department of Justice lawyers who are defending more than 200 cases against the administration in court. Judges have accused DOJ lawyers of providing inadequate answers and flimsy evidence, defying court orders, and even behaving like toddlers.

Trump has said the justice system is a "rigged system" run by "radical left lunatics," but former federal judge John E. Jones III, whom President George W. Bush appointed to the bench, agreed that DOJ lawyers have "lost a fair measure of their credibility."

Authoritarian governments are based on the idea that some people are better than others. This translates into the idea that some people have special insight based only upon their superiority. They don't have to listen to experts, who just muddle the clear picture the leader can see. When reality intrudes on that vision, the problem is not the ideology of the leader, it is obstruction by political opponents.

As Trump told Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer of The Atlantic about his presidencies: "The first time, I had two things to do—run the country and survive; I had all these crooked guys," he said. "And the second time, I run the country and the world."

Trump himself illustrated this ideology again in the interview with Kristen Welker when he explained his trade war. "Look," he said. "We were losing hundreds of billions of dollars with China. Now we're essentially not doing business with China. Therefore, we're saving hundreds of billions of dollars. Very simple."

It is not, in fact, that simple.

This impulse to downplay expertise and concentrate power in a strongman shows in Trump's tapping of Secretary of State Marco Rubio as acting national security advisor, as well as acting head of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and acting administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Clearly, Trump doesn't think he needs experts in at least three of those four senior posts. Perhaps it also shows there are few experts still willing to work in a Trump White House.

The results of this disdain for expertise shows these days most immediately in the policies of Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. As measles continues to spread across the U.S., a spokesperson for Health and Human Services said Friday that Kennedy will turn the country's health agencies away from promoting vaccination, which is 97% effective in preventing the disease, and toward exploring new treatments for it, including vitamins.

"It's not that there's been a lack of studies," Dr. Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota, told Teddy Rosenbluth of the New York Times. Decades of research have not discovered dramatic treatments, while vaccinations have proven safe and effective at preventing the life-threatening disease.

Rosenbluth noted that "[p]ublic health experts are baffled by Mr. Kennedy's decision to hunt for new treatments, rather than endorse shots that have decades of safety and efficacy data." This stance seems to contradict Kennedy's longstanding focus on preventing disease.

Kennedy has also falsely claimed that the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) contains "aborted fetus debris," that parents should "do their own research," and that he will institute testing for new vaccines with placebo-controlled trials, a practice medical experts warn could be unethical as subjects believe they are protected from disease when they are not.

Infectious disease expert Paul Offit told Jessica Glenza of The Guardian: "It's his goal to even further lessen trust in vaccines and make it onerous enough for manufacturers that they will abandon it."

At the end of March, Kennedy also vowed to study possible links between vaccines and autism, although repeated scholarly studies have shown no link. Kennedy has tapped David Geier, who does not have a medical degree and was disciplined in Maryland for practicing medicine without a license, to perform the study.

On Thursday, former New York Times global health reporter Donald G. McNeil Jr. noted that both Geier and Kennedy have made significant money thanks to their anti-vax stands as they monetize alleged treatments and sue pharmaceutical companies.

In Ars Technica on April 30, microbiologist and senior health reporter Beth Mole explored another angle to understand Kennedy's policies. She noted that Kennedy, who is neither a doctor nor a public health expert, does not believe in the foundational principle of modern medicine: germ theory.

In a 2021 book, Kennedy argued the idea that microscopic viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi cause disease serves the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare industry that grew around it by "emphasiz[ing] targeting particular germs with specific drugs rather than fortifying the immune system through healthy living, clean water, and good nutrition." He accused those supporting this system, including Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who was a proponent of the Covid vaccine, of misleading the American public.

While Kennedy appears to believe germs exist, he also claims to believe in the older theory of disease called "miasma theory," although as Mole points out, he misunderstands that theory—the idea that diseases are caused by poisonous vapors—and really appears to believe in another old idea: "terrain theory." Terrain theory maintains that diseases are signs that the internal "terrain" of the body is out of whack.

This would explain Kennedy's assertion—refuted by doctors—that the children who died of measles were malnourished. As medical blogger Kristen Panthagani, MD/PhD, explains: Kennedy's way of thinking is "the belief that infections don't pose a risk to healthy people who have optimized their immune system."

While underlying medical conditions certainly affect people's health, Mole notes that "the evidence against terrain theory is obvious and all around us." But if you think germs are less important than overall health, things like the pasteurization of milk to kill E. coli, salmonella, and Listeria bacteria—which Kennedy opposes—are unnecessary.

In 1876, German microbiologist Robert Koch discovered that the cause of anthrax was a bacterium. Germ theory challenged established practices In the U.S., where doctors in the 1860s during the Civil War believed the best demonstration of their skill was their bloody aprons and instruments, instruments they kept in a velvet-lined case.

In 1881 the doctor overseeing President James Garfield's recovery from a gunshot wound repeatedly probed the president's wound with dirty instruments and his fingers, prompting assassin Charles Guiteau to plead not guilty of the murder by claiming, "The doctors killed Garfield, I just shot him."

But just four years later, germ theory was so widely accepted that the U.S. Army required medical officers to inspect their posts every month and report the results to the administration, and by 1886, disease rates were dropping. By 1889, the U.S. Army had written manuals for sanitary field hospitals, and the need to combat germs was so commonplace medical officers rarely mentioned it.

And now, in 2025, the top health official in the United States, a man without degrees in either medicine or public health, appears to be rejecting germ theory and reshaping the nation's medical system around his own dedication to a theory that was outdated well over a century ago.

—


--
****
Juan Matute
The Harold Wilke House 
Claremont, California

Who is Asset Kraznov?
(we know where he is)


Posted by No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)