The Strongmen Are Having a Very Bad WeekTrump threatens war, Orbán falls, Pope Leo stands firm, and reality keeps rudely refusing to cooperate.
Good morning! To the war-drunk grifters, oligarch media hobbyists, and discount strongmen currently treating the planet like their own private escape room, I hope you eat a little crow. We begin in the Strait of Hormuz, where Donald Trump has decided that if reality refuses to flatter him, he will simply threaten it harder. Trump posted a snarling declaration that the United States would begin the process of blockading ships trying to enter or leave the strait, framing Iran’s mine threats and toll extortion as “WORLD EXTORTION” and promising that any Iranian who fired on U.S. forces or commercial shipping would be “BLOWN TO HELL,” with America “LOCKED AND LOADED.” The accompanying Fox interview did nothing to calm matters. Instead, Trump doubled down, saying the U.S. was “going to be blockading,” touting an “all in, all out” regime, and making clear that if Iran did not abandon its nuclear ambitions, he was prepared to inflict even more destruction.
What makes this even more grotesque is how casually Trump discussed civilization-scale violence, as though he were rearranging tee times instead of threatening to blow up bridges, power plants, and whatever else wandered into his line of sight. In the same interview, he defended his earlier threat that “a whole civilization” could die, said he was “fine with it,” and openly vowed that if Iran did not give up its nuclear effort, he would “further destruct Iran.” He also boasted that Iran’s military was essentially gone, bragging that “their Navy is gone,” “their Air Force is gone,” and that the country had “no cards.” He sounds like a man lurching between campaign rally, mafia don, and cable-news call-in guest while holding the machinery of war. Outside the MAGA terrarium, the view is rather less impressed. France 24’s assessment of the failed talks was blunt: neither side showed much urgency or willingness to compromise, oil prices still hit American consumers whether Trump understands that or not, and none of Washington’s allies are joining this blockade adventure, including Britain, which would prefer a diplomatic path. Their analyst offered what may be the cleanest diagnosis of U.S. leadership at the moment: a White House that tends to “observe its own reality.” That is such a devastatingly polite way of saying the people in charge are governing from inside a hallucination bubble. Shipping analyst Sal Mercogliano came in with the sort of reality-based explanation that ought to be tattooed on the inside of every cable pundit’s eyelids. His point is that maritime logistics do not care about Trump’s all-caps swagger. You do not answer one illegal chokehold on the strait with another blockade and pretend you have restored order. Mercogliano notes that CENTCOM’s actual clarification is narrower than Trump’s bluster, focusing on traffic to and from Iranian ports rather than shutting the whole strait, which tells you the military itself is already sanding down the president’s social-media theater into something slightly less deranged. Still, he is crystal clear that blockading is a state-of-war act, and that the economic consequences are now hitting because the ships that should be arriving from the Gulf are simply not showing up. The administration planned for bombing runs, not for what happens when actual tankers vanish from the timetable and the global economy notices. If that were not enough self-inflicted American absurdity for one morning, Pope Leo XIV has now become the latest person Trump assumed he could bully into submission. Instead, Leo responded with the sort of cool, devastating papal side-eye that makes Trump look like a man screaming at stained glass. After Trump attacked him as too liberal, “weak on crime,” and terrible on foreign policy, Leo said he had “no fear of the Trump administration” and then delivered one of the great understated burns of the year when asked about Truth Social: “It’s ironic, the name of the site itself. Say no more.” The Pope later made clear that he had “no intention to debate” Trump because he is “not a politician” and because his message is simply peace. Leo is trying to speak in moral terms about war, domination, and peace. Trump is trying to drag the Pope into a pro-wrestling promo. The pushback from Catholic leadership was equally blunt. Archbishop Paul Coakley reminded the public that “Pope Leo is not his rival; nor is the Pope a politician.” Which is about as close as the Church comes to saying: sir, this is a cathedral, not a Fox green room. Trump appears incapable of processing moral criticism except as a personal political insult. While Leo speaks from theology, conscience, and actual seriousness, Trump retaliates with grievance, insult, and full-on AI messiah cosplay, posting a lurid image of himself in white robes and a red mantle, laying glowing hands on a stricken man as onlookers gaze up admiringly beneath an American flag, the Statue of Liberty, and bursts of celestial fireworks. It is hard to imagine a more perfect contrast between authority and ego, or between adulthood and whatever flaming circus of narcissism Trump has mistaken for leadership. Elsewhere in the authoritarian humiliation department, Viktor Orbán has now been booted from power in Hungary, and the American right is left clutching its pearls, campaign brochures, and probably a few half-finished CPAC lanyards. The significance here goes well beyond Budapest. Orbán was the MAGA movement’s favorite European strongman, the poster child for how to hollow out democracy while keeping the branding, and Trump’s people were so invested in saving him that JD Vance reportedly traveled to Hungary during the Iran crisis to campaign for him. Orbán lost anyway. As the Associated Press notes, this is a very public humiliation for Trump and the U.S. right, who treated Orbán as a model for how to bend media, courts, and elections without ever admitting that democracy had become mostly decorative. The most delicious part: even after sixteen years of packing institutions, bending the rules, and tilting the field, Orbán still got beaten. The AP quotes Steven Levitsky observing that oppositions can win despite a tilted playing field, and Ian Bassin adds the crucial takeaway for Americans: even a guy who rigs the system can be defeated when people unite and turn out against him. That is a warning flare aimed directly at every would-be American autocrat currently doodling executive fantasies in the margins. The international meaning is just as important. Orbán was Putin’s best friend inside Europe and a major obstacle to aid for Ukraine, so his fall is a setback not only for Trumpism but for the broader pro-authoritarian, anti-Ukraine bloc. Which makes the next bit of symbolism especially rich: a University of Oslo professor has publicly said he nominated Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian people for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, a gesture Trump and his little grievance fraternity will absolutely hate. Against that backdrop, the image sharpens beautifully: Orbán, the darling of the illiberal right, loses. Ukraine, the target of that same right’s cynicism, sabotage, and endless bad-faith sneering, continues to stand as the democratic counterexample. It is the sort of contrast that makes the ketchup tremble in the bottle. If you have been wondering why so much of corporate media feels weirdly flattened, timid, or selectively blind, Al Jazeera’s Listening Post offered a brutal summary. The program argues American media is not merely struggling; it is being concentrated and captured by oligarchs who do not buy outlets to defend democracy, but to defend power. The show cites the extraordinary fact that more than half of traffic to major U.S. news sites last year went to outlets controlled by just seven families or their corporate entities. Instead of a healthy press ecosystem, we have a national information system being slowly turned into a billionaire petting zoo. Their examples are not subtle. Jeff Bezos is presented as the case study in slow-motion capture: the owner who first “used his fortune to swoop in and rescue” the Washington Post, then later changed course, ordered the editorial board to focus on “personal liberties and free markets,” and presided over what the program describes as a newsroom “bloodbath.” One commentator lands the point perfectly, saying the message sent to the newsroom is that it now has “an audience of two, Jeff Bezos and Donald Trump,” which is not, last I checked, the same thing as the public. Another puts it even more bluntly: “They call it a reset. Looks more like a retreat to me.” The segment turns to CBS and the Ellison family, portraying their moves as even more openly ideological. The point is not just that rich people own media. It is that, as the program says, these oligarchic owners often have “much larger businesses,” including in some cases “defense contracts, billion-dollar contracts that have nothing to do with news,” so when journalism becomes inconvenient, it is the journalism that gets trimmed. At CBS, the segment says the Ellisons “quickly installed Barry Weiss,” even though she had “exactly zero experience working in television news,” and the result was immediate: “CBS News suddenly look at 60 Minutes as not an independent journalistic bulwark of truth … and suddenly it’s got some fear in favor.” Weiss, we are told, has brought in commentators “virtually all of them conservative, pro-Israel, and pro-Iran war,” while “redrawing the lines of what falls in the 40 yard lines of acceptable debate.” Legacy institutions get remade into something more compliant, more pro-war, and more accommodating of concentrated power. The “observes its own reality” White House does not operate in a vacuum. It is helped along by a media class increasingly owned by people who would rather manage access than confront power. Finally, one developing Epstein-related subplot is worth watching carefully, but carefully is the key word. Survivor Amanda Ungaro has posted ominous warnings on social media directed at Melania Trump and Pam Bondi, and Allison Gill raised the possibility that those posts may help explain why Melania suddenly chose to drag the Epstein story back into the open with that strange White House statement denying ties and urging hearings. Gill is explicit that there is no confirmation that Ungaro’s posts triggered Melania’s move. Still, the timing is suspicious enough to be notable, especially now that the question hanging over Melania’s statement remains so obvious: why now? Why, when the story had cooled, did the first lady suddenly leap into the spotlight to deny things that had not been dominating headlines that week? It doesn’t prove anything, but it does suggest somebody in that household may know another shoe is wobbling on the ledge. Marz and I continue our nightly moonbeam vigils and hold you all in our thoughts. Even as Trump’s handlers do their best to shield him from public view, with even his state meeting with the King and Queen of the Kingdom of the Netherlands reportedly closed to the press, the stakes remain as high as ever. A shuttered room does not make the danger disappear; it only makes the evasion more obvious. So this is the moment to keep the pressure squarely on Congress, which still has both the authority and the obligation to rein in Trump’s war before more damage is done. They cannot keep outsourcing their courage while the rest of the world absorbs the shockwaves. |
|
9:04 AM (19 minutes ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
The Reflexive Absolution of TrumpA failed Iran gambit, fresh domestic corruption, and the ongoing transformation of every Trump aberration into something his movement feels obliged to defend
Good morning! Welcome to Sunday’s edition of America’s ongoing experiment in whether chest-thumping can substitute for strategy, governance, or basic adult competence. Over the weekend, the Trump administration managed to turn a delicate cease-fire window into a showcase for exactly the kind of foreign-policy malpractice that has become its trademark. JD Vance went to Islamabad for 21 hours of talks with Iran and came home empty-handed, announcing that the United States had made its “final and best offer” and that Iran had refused to accept American terms. The phrase “final and best offer” is doing a lot of work there. It really means Trumpworld once again mistook ultimatums for diplomacy and swagger for leverage.
The more details that emerge, the worse Vance looks. Al Jazeera’s reporting made clear the U.S. position was not merely tough but irrationally maximalist, with Vance demanding an “affirmative commitment” that Iran would never seek a nuclear weapon and never seek the tools that could let it quickly achieve one, “for the long term.” That is not really an arms-control framework so much as Washington announcing that it reserves the right to define the permanent outer boundary of another country’s sovereignty. It is a demand you make when you are less interested in reaching an agreement than in blaming the other side for not surrendering on command. The same reporting also underscored the White House’s chronic incoherence. As Al Jazeera noted, Trump had already flip-flopped on the Strait of Hormuz, at one point saying it was of no real interest to the United States and other countries should handle it themselves, then later declaring it central to U.S. demands and saying there could be no negotiations unless it was reopened. He was similarly slippery on the purpose of the talks themselves: while Vance was in Pakistan insisting the administration needed a long-term Iranian commitment on nuclear capability, Trump was simultaneously signaling that whether or not there was a deal “makes no difference” because the U.S. had already “won.” The familiar Trumpian pattern of holding several incompatible positions at once, depending on which audience, mood, or social media post happens to be in front of him. That incoherence hardened into outright danger in the latest New York Times live updates, which reported that after the talks failed to produce an immediate deal, Trump started threatening a U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The Times noted the obvious point that a blockade is widely considered an act of war, which means the administration’s sequence here was: fail at diplomacy, then menace the region with escalation, then expect everyone else to treat this as proof of strength rather than evidence of a governing philosophy best described as “angry guy at the end of the bar.” Iran appeared to leave the door open to further diplomacy before the April 21 cease-fire deadline. Once again, the supposedly serious men of Trumpworld managed to make themselves look like the least serious people in the room. All of this becomes even more dramatic, and a little more ridiculous, if the credible reporting about U.S. munitions strain is correct. There is now enough serious reporting to suggest that while the United States is not “out of weapons,” it is under real pressure in several high-end categories, including long-range strike missiles and advanced air- and missile-defense interceptors. Reporting has pointed in particular to strain around systems like JASSM-ER, Patriot/PAC-3 interceptors, THAAD interceptors, and other precision weapons that are not easily or quickly replaced. That makes the administration’s earlier macho claims about bottomless American firepower look less like confidence and more like poker. Threatening wider escalation is one thing when you have comfortable reserves, a deep bench of ready munitions, and an industrial base that can replenish losses without breaking a sweat. It looks very different when reports are already circulating that the stockpiles most relevant to a modern regional war are being chewed through faster than they can be comfortably replaced. It is not simply that shortages are embarrassing or that they expose the emptiness of all the “unlimited strength” rhetoric. It is that every missile burned through in the Gulf is a missile unavailable for some other contingency, whether that means deterring China in the Pacific, sustaining aid commitments in Europe, protecting bases and ships elsewhere in the Middle East, or simply maintaining the kind of credible reserve that keeps adversaries from testing American weakness in the first place. A country can still be militarily formidable and yet become strategically exposed if it starts treating finite inventories as props in a political performance. Awkwardly, empire, like everything else, runs on inventory, production lines, shipping schedules, and replacement rates. The most damning contrast, though, is historical. A Crisis Group expert pointed out that the 2015 nuclear agreement Trump blew up took two and a half years of arduous negotiations, with political will on both sides, and professional diplomats working line by line to reach a deal focused on the nuclear file alone. That was before the additional complications of missiles, proxies, frozen assets, Hormuz, and the ocean of mistrust created by Trump’s own behavior. To imagine that JD Vance could swagger into Pakistan and sort out a far more complicated crisis in 21 hours is not just naïve, but is the kind of delusion that only thrives in a political culture where ignorance is mistaken for authenticity and amateurism is marketed as strength. Trump already destroyed the painstaking diplomatic architecture that existed when he pulled out of the 2015 agreement. Now his administration is trying to brute-force a much harder negotiation with less trust, less credibility, and a supporting cast that appears to have been assembled by opening a bag labeled “guys who think real estate makes them Kissinger.” That impression is not helped by the fact Vance was flanked pt by Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, which is not exactly a tableau that inspires confidence in the gravitas of the mission. Nothing says “trust our geopolitical judgment” quite like surrounding a failed negotiation with two of Trumpworld’s most overrated avatars of inherited influence and billionaire pomposity. When even the friendliest interpretation is that these are the people trying to navigate one of the world’s most combustible strategic flashpoints, it becomes increasingly hard not to conclude that Trump foreign policy is what happens when a group project is assigned to the least prepared boys in the seminar, each of whom is certain he should be in charge. If there was any moral clarity to be found amid this mess, it from Rome. Pope Leo condemned the “delusion of omnipotence,” rejected the use of God to sanctify violence, and called on leaders to stop choosing the table of rearmament over the table of dialogue. In a few sentences he managed to sound more serious, humane, and strategically coherent than the entire Trump administration has sounded in weeks. While Vance flew home with no agreement and Trump lurked online threatening blockade theater, the Pope offered what sounded like actual civilization: less bombast, less worship of power, less idolatry of force, and more recognition that real strength serves life instead of staging death as spectacle. Which brings me to a term I think we need to start using more openly: Trump Devotional Syndrome. For years, MAGA has tried to throw around “Trump Derangement Syndrome” as though the irrational people are the ones who notice his lies, corruption, cruelty, ignorance, or instability and respond accordingly. What we are actually watching is Trump Devotional Syndrome: a condition in which devotees respond to Trump’s conduct by excusing it, glorifying it, and reshaping reality around it. This is a man who is a convicted felon, whose charitable foundation was shut down for misuse of funds, who has long been shadowed by his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, and who has faced numerous accusations of sexual assault, including the civil case in which E. Jean Carroll proved he sexually abused her and defamed her. None of that dislodges the devotion. Instead, every disgrace is recast as persecution, every humiliation as proof of courage, every corruption as just another sign that the leader is above ordinary judgment. The syndrome is that millions of people have conditioned themselves to treat moral depravity, criminality, and public failure as things to be rationalized, sanctified, and absorbed into the mythology. If anyone wants to see where that kind of devotional politics leads when it becomes a national model, look at Hungary. The Financial Times published a devastating assessment of Viktor Orbán’s economic record, noting that Orbánomics has centralized power, undermined independent institutions, fueled corruption, weakened public services, driven some of the worst inflation in the European Union, and left Hungary poorer, less productive, and demographically weaker. The global right loves Orbán because he wraps decay in nationalist aesthetics. He gives them the vibe of dominance while delivering the reality of stagnation. That is the heart of Trump Devotional Syndrome: the damage is obvious, but the faithful keep calling it renewal. At home, the domestic side of the story remains exactly as rotten as you would expect. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has repeatedly joked, and perhaps not entirely joked, about issuing mass pardons to administration officials before leaving office, including quipping that he would pardon everyone who had come within “200 feet of the Oval.” The dark comedy of that image is real, but the darker truth is even more revealing. Trump increasingly treats the pardon power not as an instrument of mercy or justice but as a form of advance indemnity for loyalists willing to carry out his agenda and absorb the legal consequences. Stay close, obedient, break what needs breaking, because the boss will take care of you later. Mob-law with a presidential seal on top. That same authoritarian instinct shows up in the fight over Section 702, a part of U.S. surveillance law that lets intelligence agencies collect the emails, texts, and other communications of foreigners overseas without a warrant, often directly from American tech and communications companies. The government insists the target is foreign intelligence, but the problem is that Americans’ communications can get swept up in the process too, and officials can then search that data later. That is why civil-liberties advocates have long warned that Section 702 creates a back door to warrantless surveillance of Americans. Now The Washington Post reports that the White House wants Congress to rubber-stamp an 18-month extension of this already controversial authority even as a recent classified court ruling reportedly raised new concerns about how the program handles Americans’ data. Trump is demanding more spying power at the exact moment oversight is suggesting the safeguards may not be nearly as solid as advertised. The sales pitch is that only the paranoid, unserious, or disloyal would object. But what keeps happening in this country is that the people asking for extraordinary power are also the people least interested in restraint, transparency, or constitutional modesty. Funny how that works. So that is the picture this Sunday morning. Abroad, Trumpworld is trying to substitute ultimatums, blockade threats, and mediocre-man confidence for serious diplomacy, all while acting as though the painstaking agreement Trump himself wrecked should somehow be reproducible in a long weekend by Vance, Kushner, and Witkoff. At home, the administration continues to normalize impunity, pre-negotiate absolution for loyalists, and press for broader surveillance authority despite fresh warning signs of abuse. Looming over all of it is the deeper pathology: Trump Devotional Syndrome: the compulsive excuse-making that turns Trump’s aberrant behavior into proof of genius. The real story is that Trump is a vain, impulsive, deeply unserious man whose greatest political achievement has been convincing millions of people that his every weakness is secretly a kind of dark political alchemy. As the country and the world keep relearning, there is nothing more dangerous than a cult that mistakes failure for revelation. |
